Page 3 of 5

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:31 pm
by Benny The Noon
:laugh:

wtat

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:34 pm
by Bad Bob
Image

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:35 pm
by Benny The Noon
:laugh:

That should be in the funny pics thread

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:37 pm
by dawson99
I went to a toga party dressed as a goat

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:39 pm
by Benny The Noon
Thats cause your stupid as well as being unable to spell :D

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:39 pm
by dawson99
Benny The Noon wrote:Thats cause your stupid as well as being unable to spell :D

that's just mean  :(


Nah, I'm Awesome  :D

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:43 pm
by fivecups
dawson99 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
dawson99 wrote:
Bad Bob wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote::angry:


Yeah i always get them mixed up :p

Poor spelling's for loosers...jsut aks Dwason.  :;):

fkcu ouy

edit:  :D  in case it looked serious

nkob

you want to bonk?


you're yag  :rasp

So's Dujge and Danlo.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:45 pm
by fivecups
Bad Bob wrote:
fivecups wrote:If we're going to have a rant thread, then it's very annoying when people don't read, structure and correct their posts before posting them. Many posts on Newkit are almost unreadable because of spelling and grammatical errors. And in most cases, it's not an inability to write properly, it's just laziness. How hard is it to preview and correct a post before posting it?

I'm no grammatical genius but I generally try to review my posts to ensure they are readable before putting them up.

What do you think?


A good point well made, but...

Taken from another thread:
Benny The Noon wrote:
fivecups wrote:I think it's looked that way so far this season Benny. Lucas/ Poulsen in the holding position, Stevie with more license to get forward and Cole in the hole, linking with Torres, Jova and Kuyt. We've discussed this several times before on Newkit and my issue with this is we loose the Gerrard-Torres partnership and the goals that come with it. The 4-4-2 change for tonight may indicate Hodgson's longer term plan to switch to this formation, which I understand he's favoured in the past. Again, I prefer a 4-5-1 variant, especially away from home, all day long.

It seems we will still have the same old problems mate - cover when we loose either Torres or Gerrard to injury and we are going to rely on Cole to unlock defences . We still lack the same sort of options required .


IT'S LOSE NOT LOOSE, PEOPLE...SORT IT OUT!  :no   :rasp

Hahaha! Oops.  :D

As I say I'm no grammatical (or spelling) genius.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:46 pm
by fivecups
Russian doll! Russian doll!

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:52 pm
by SupitsJonF
Bad Bob wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:
fivecups wrote:I think it's looked that way so far this season Benny. Lucas/ Poulsen in the holding position, Stevie with more license to get forward and Cole in the hole, linking with Torres, Jova and Kuyt. We've discussed this several times before on Newkit and my issue with this is we loose the Gerrard-Torres partnership and the goals that come with it. The 4-4-2 change for tonight may indicate Hodgson's longer term plan to switch to this formation, which I understand he's favoured in the past. Again, I prefer a 4-5-1 variant, especially away from home, all day long.

It seems we will still have the same old problems mate - cover when we loose either Torres or Gerrard to injury and we are going to rely on Cole to unlock defences . We still lack the same sort of options required .


IT'S LOSE NOT LOOSE, PEOPLE...SORT IT OUT!  :no   :rasp

:bowdown  :bowdown

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:08 pm
by Madmax
Can't believe a thread has been created whining about internet discussions. Who gives a feck!! just say what you have to say and move forward you won't win an award for getting your point across. I think some people take this a little too serious.. Go out live your life a little! :)

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:12 pm
by dawson99
Madmax wrote:Can't believe a thread has been created whining about internet discussions. Who gives a feck!! just say what you have to say and move forward you won't win an award for getting your point across. I think some people take this a little too serious.. Go out live your life a little! :)

you can f*ck off as well  :D

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:12 pm
by fivecups
Madmax wrote:I think some people take this a little too serious.. Go out live your life a little! :)

What sort of sentencing is that?  ???








:D

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:18 pm
by Madmax
dawson99 wrote:
Madmax wrote:Can't believe a thread has been created whining about internet discussions. Who gives a feck!! just say what you have to say and move forward you won't win an award for getting your point across. I think some people take this a little too serious.. Go out live your life a little! :)

you can f*ck off as well  :D

ok i will  :D

PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:27 pm
by neil
fivecups wrote:...grammatical errors. And in most cases, it's not an inability to write properly....

I'm no grammatical genius

What do you think?

I agree, there are two glaring grammatical errors there alone.