Baby p, - Who is to blame?
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:17 am
Parliament Debate.
I show this link first as this is the attitude that is shown by our "leaders".
What happened to that kid and reading about I must admit I shed a tear. The kid had no chance. He was born into a family of scum and everyone associated with them had an idea of what was going on. Social Services visited sixty times to check on the kid. SIXTY times, if they had to visit more than once doesnt that show that alarm bells were already ringing?
People will blame the Social Services and rightly so, to visit so many times and not spot anything that isnt right? My god, a blind person would see what is wrong.
The government. Watching Question Time tonight someone in the audience raised a good point. Rather than give money to the banks, shouldnt money be given to the public sector to improve what is obviously a poor system. More money would mean sending one social worker to 12 families rather than 25.
The friends / relatives. Surely somebody could see what was happening? Maybe they did and relied on social services to sort it, that would explain the sixty visits, why didnt someone offer to babysit if they thought something was wrong? why didnt someone just take that poor kid out of there?
The parents / guardians. Without a doubt they are to blame. There is no excuse to what they have done. Capital punishment should be brought back specifically for these people. If they can live with what they have done to this kid they can live with prison. Killing these scumbags would mean we can do without the kind of people that are capable of this kind of thing. Human rights shouldnt exist for these kind of people. They have a problem, they are a problem, and there is only one solution I can think of.
I show this link first as this is the attitude that is shown by our "leaders".
What happened to that kid and reading about I must admit I shed a tear. The kid had no chance. He was born into a family of scum and everyone associated with them had an idea of what was going on. Social Services visited sixty times to check on the kid. SIXTY times, if they had to visit more than once doesnt that show that alarm bells were already ringing?
People will blame the Social Services and rightly so, to visit so many times and not spot anything that isnt right? My god, a blind person would see what is wrong.
The government. Watching Question Time tonight someone in the audience raised a good point. Rather than give money to the banks, shouldnt money be given to the public sector to improve what is obviously a poor system. More money would mean sending one social worker to 12 families rather than 25.
The friends / relatives. Surely somebody could see what was happening? Maybe they did and relied on social services to sort it, that would explain the sixty visits, why didnt someone offer to babysit if they thought something was wrong? why didnt someone just take that poor kid out of there?
The parents / guardians. Without a doubt they are to blame. There is no excuse to what they have done. Capital punishment should be brought back specifically for these people. If they can live with what they have done to this kid they can live with prison. Killing these scumbags would mean we can do without the kind of people that are capable of this kind of thing. Human rights shouldnt exist for these kind of people. They have a problem, they are a problem, and there is only one solution I can think of.