Page 30 of 33
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:19 amby The Specialist
This whole bet thing was a bit overdramatic, yes.
Who cares what Lando or anyone thinks? Do they know you in real-life? No. Why bother getting wound-up about it?
Anyway, we can move on. Sorry if I was out of line, but really it's just that I don't see the point in people getting bothered by internet users and feeling the need to make big things out of stuff that should just roll off your back.
Back to Alonso..
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:20 amby 112-1077774096
again i didnt raise the bet, but yes you are right, and thats why i ended it
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:35 amby bigmick
Feck me so much for my imput as to how I think Alonso has become less effective due to a) the opposition centre forward being able to mark him too easily, and b) him not moving into and recieving the ball in the right areas.
I even went into why I think Gerrard would play better with Masherano, and how the problems if they do indeed exist could be overcome. Alas, nobody gives a feck 
All anyone really cares about is the difference between a theory and a hypothesis (don't ask me FFS) and whether or not two blokes are going to have a bet on something which can't be absolutely proven one way or another, in Nottingham, for thirty thousand pounds, tomorrow.
Come to think of it you guys are right, feck the football I'll shut me gob, your discussion is much more interesting .
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:43 amby flombs
Here the united forces of peewee and lando team up....
Ciao, Juve_Italia
Testa ti mincia or something like that
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:45 amby Juve_Italia
If you refer to my earlier post, you'll notice that I'm a complete d!ckhead and I have no place on here. Hopefully I won't infest this space again.
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:46 amby 112-1077774096
bye bye
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:46 amby flombs
Animale, Cornuto, cornetto...mmmmmm cornetto 
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 6:48 amby flombs
Ahhh, well that was refreshing
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 7:30 amby Judge
redtrader74 wrote:Sabre wrote:This thread has it all. Football, spats, porn (when Judge posts)
Versatile thread.
Yeah that Judge, he doesn't post enough, i really can't get enough of his Avatar, oops i mean fantastic insight!!
This thread has more lives than a cat, it just refuses to die!
i am a genius
cheers lads
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 7:48 amby GunGod
Lando_Griffin wrote:GunGod wrote:Lando_Griffin wrote:
A "Hypothesis" (Which is basically another term for a theory)...
AHHAHAH WAHAHAHA ROFL! ROFL!
THEY ARE NOT EVEN THE SAME IF NOT ENTIRELY DIFFERENT IN MEANING.
Have you even checked your dictionary? This sentence of yours absolutely contradicts the purpose of having the two separate terms 'hypothesis' and 'theory'.
I couldn't even believe you said that.
So much for being a 'highly qualified English teacher'!!!!
I rest my case with you.
----------------------------------------------------
P.S.
Lando: "THEN try and f*cking condescend to me, you arrogant tw*t.
:"
With that statement of yours I guess I can be condescending to you anytime, mate. You just keep exposing your flaws everytime you reply to me
Bow down to me, ignoramus:
Suck my balls, c*ntCheck out the little bit that says "Definition".
Oh - the joys of proving a mouthy little tw*t wrong.
Hhahahahahah!
Did I just see someone use a thesaurus for looking up on the meaning of words???
You are such an absolute joke mate. You just keep on and on and on making a fool of yourself each time you try to prove yourself.
Why don't you check out a proper online dictionaryinstead?
Check this out: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=82359&dict=CALD
It basically says a theory is a formal statement of rules which is used to explain an opinion.
Which basically means an opinion remains an opinion until it is proven and backed by concrete evidence. Then it can be said to be a theory --> law ---> fact.
And don't even try to worm your way out by saying 'theory' can be used in various ways, for what we are contesting ultimately, is the usage of the word 'fact' which you amusingly challenged others without even a good comprehension of what it means. If you want to talk about 'facts', talk about it in the scientific understanding. Don't bullsh!t that theory = hypothesis/opinion/guess.
In the academic world 'theory' is a serious word. But from your clueless usage of selected words I guess you are nothing but just a layman who makes educated guesses but ultimately doesn't know what he's talking about.
'Hypothesis' and 'theory', while not in absolute terms, share a relationship not unlike 'raw' and 'cooked'. While they might be the same piece of meat they are vastly different in composition.
Now Lando, let's just hear you say 'raw' and 'cooked' basically means the same thing.
WAHAHAHAH.
------------------------------------------------------
P.S. Given your crude nature in the forums it wouldn't be surprising you eat all your meat raw. That's why you can't differentiate well 
AHHAHAA.
Shan't waste anymore time on you. Thks for all the laughter.
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 7:59 amby Judge
thankyou magnus 'gungod' magnusson
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 8:06 amby mungi
yea thanks for clearing that up
Posted:
Thu May 31, 2007 9:51 amby Ciggy
See things havent changed in a week
you!