Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:44 ambabu wrote:you're all freckin gay, except peewee - he's a ladyboy
Wanna join the parade sweet cheeks ?
Wanna join the parade sweet cheeks ?
Liverpool FC Forum
Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
Post match everton v liverpool - Are we happy now ?
Page 15 of 20
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:44 amWanna join the parade sweet cheeks ?
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:44 amgood post matty
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:05 amBamaga man wrote:Wanna join the parade sweet cheeks ?
jesus. i've seen your picture mate, even if i was gay, my standards would be a hell of lot higher.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:14 amLOL thats harsh babu , give him a chance
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:16 amYeah, Babu I could always where one of these then.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:20 amThats sick, i'm only joking.
I'm hetrosexual.
I'm hetrosexual.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:21 am
talking of tackles (can you see what i did there?)
it was only a sliding tackle but some dirty blue lowered the pitch just as he slid to make it look bad
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:23 amEverton boss David Moyes has insisted that he would not accept an apology from referee Mark Clattenburg.
Still reeling after Saturday's Merseyside derby defeat, Moyes has hit out at Clattenburg's display and questioned his relationship with Rafa Benitez's side.
The 32-year-old official chose not to award Everton a penalty in the dying seconds after Joleon Lescott was tugged down by Jamie Carragher.
Clattenburg also chose not to send off Dirk Kuyt after the Dutchman lunged wildly at Phil Neville, and dubiously switched from a yellow to a red card when dealing with Tony Hibbert's foul on Steven Gerrard.
Earlier in the season, Liverpool were victim of poor refereeing when Rob Styles awarded Chelsea a soft penalty at Anfield.
Friend
Styles subsequently contacted Benitez in order to apologise to the Spaniard for his costly error.
However, Moyes has revealed that he has no intention of even speaking to Clattenburg, and also questioned the referee's relationship with the Anfield club - comments which may land him in hot water with the Football Association.
"Rob Styles phoned Liverpool to apologise over a penalty against Chelsea, but if Clattenburg did the same, I wouldn't take the call," he said.
"You wonder whether they allow themselves to be influenced by the top four. Didn't Clattenburg go to Hong Kong with Liverpool for the Asia Cup this summer? Maybe he wants to be their friend."
Blatant
Moyes further vented his frustration at Clattenburg's performance, insisting that his decisions were 'incredible'.
"I've tried not to talk about referees, but the decisions he has made have cost us," he added.
"You could have said 'okay, he got a couple of things wrong', and I can, but the one in the final second is so blatant that to get that wrong on top of everything else was just incredible.
"I have to question whether you can referee if you don't see that foul on Joleon Lescott by Jamie Carragher."
is he our friend lmao, i dont think so, other wise he would have ruled out Samis goal for being offside
Still reeling after Saturday's Merseyside derby defeat, Moyes has hit out at Clattenburg's display and questioned his relationship with Rafa Benitez's side.
The 32-year-old official chose not to award Everton a penalty in the dying seconds after Joleon Lescott was tugged down by Jamie Carragher.
Clattenburg also chose not to send off Dirk Kuyt after the Dutchman lunged wildly at Phil Neville, and dubiously switched from a yellow to a red card when dealing with Tony Hibbert's foul on Steven Gerrard.
Earlier in the season, Liverpool were victim of poor refereeing when Rob Styles awarded Chelsea a soft penalty at Anfield.
Friend
Styles subsequently contacted Benitez in order to apologise to the Spaniard for his costly error.
However, Moyes has revealed that he has no intention of even speaking to Clattenburg, and also questioned the referee's relationship with the Anfield club - comments which may land him in hot water with the Football Association.
"Rob Styles phoned Liverpool to apologise over a penalty against Chelsea, but if Clattenburg did the same, I wouldn't take the call," he said.
"You wonder whether they allow themselves to be influenced by the top four. Didn't Clattenburg go to Hong Kong with Liverpool for the Asia Cup this summer? Maybe he wants to be their friend."
Blatant
Moyes further vented his frustration at Clattenburg's performance, insisting that his decisions were 'incredible'.
"I've tried not to talk about referees, but the decisions he has made have cost us," he added.
"You could have said 'okay, he got a couple of things wrong', and I can, but the one in the final second is so blatant that to get that wrong on top of everything else was just incredible.
"I have to question whether you can referee if you don't see that foul on Joleon Lescott by Jamie Carragher."
is he our friend lmao, i dont think so, other wise he would have ruled out Samis goal for being offside
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:31 amyeap thank god he didn't or gollem would really have his panties ina bunch
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:48 amToffee I see your post count has soared up to fifty nine interjections. Aside from one slightly longer ramble, they are almost all of the one sentence variety, and having studied them all at some length I have come to the conclusion that you are still to make a single point worthy of note.
Either you specialise in wanton buffoonery, you are a wind-up merchant, or you have absolutely no knowledge of the game of Association Football whatsoever. My money is on the second option, with the distinct possibility of a two/three combo. If however you come in good faith and do despite all previous evidence have a modicum of a clue, try waiting your moment and posting something relevent, insightful, or funny even.
I am blessed with a fairly long fuse, too long sometimes but you are managing to achieve something which very few people on here have ever managed, in that you are really getting on my t!ts.
Either you specialise in wanton buffoonery, you are a wind-up merchant, or you have absolutely no knowledge of the game of Association Football whatsoever. My money is on the second option, with the distinct possibility of a two/three combo. If however you come in good faith and do despite all previous evidence have a modicum of a clue, try waiting your moment and posting something relevent, insightful, or funny even.
I am blessed with a fairly long fuse, too long sometimes but you are managing to achieve something which very few people on here have ever managed, in that you are really getting on my t!ts.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:52 amMoyes is a t!t.
The guy has got absolutely no class. swings and roundabouts, has he forgotten last season already, im sure theres a dvd somewhere regarding it
The guy has got absolutely no class. swings and roundabouts, has he forgotten last season already, im sure theres a dvd somewhere regarding it
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:13 ammattylfc wrote:The fact that when they were a man short, he didnt show any willingness to attack them and go for the win really surprised me.
Be fair Matty in the 87th minute Rafa took Momo off and brought Pennant on.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:18 ambigmick wrote:Toffee I see your post count has soared up to fifty nine interjections. Aside from one slightly longer ramble, they are almost all of the one sentence variety, and having studied them all at some length I have come to the conclusion that you are still to make a single point worthy of note.
Either you specialise in wanton buffoonery, you are a wind-up merchant, or you have absolutely no knowledge of the game of Association Football whatsoever. My money is on the second option, with the distinct possibility of a two/three combo. If however you come in good faith and do despite all previous evidence have a modicum of a clue, try waiting your moment and posting something relevent, insightful, or funny even.
I am blessed with a fairly long fuse, too long sometimes but you are managing to achieve something which very few people on here have ever managed, in that you are really getting on my t!ts.
mic i seriously think u have something against me ? back off will ya?
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:22 amToffeehater wrote:bigmick wrote:Toffee I see your post count has soared up to fifty nine interjections. Aside from one slightly longer ramble, they are almost all of the one sentence variety, and having studied them all at some length I have come to the conclusion that you are still to make a single point worthy of note.
Either you specialise in wanton buffoonery, you are a wind-up merchant, or you have absolutely no knowledge of the game of Association Football whatsoever. My money is on the second option, with the distinct possibility of a two/three combo. If however you come in good faith and do despite all previous evidence have a modicum of a clue, try waiting your moment and posting something relevent, insightful, or funny even.
I am blessed with a fairly long fuse, too long sometimes but you are managing to achieve something which very few people on here have ever managed, in that you are really getting on my t!ts.
mic i seriously think u have something against me ? back off will ya?
Chill mate... and take the advise..... Mick's a fairly tolerant guy and if you're getting on his t!ts, then you're getting on a lot of people's tatas... I assure you.
Just count yourself lucky that you're not on peewee's jugs... He's got a nice pair and he doesn't take too kindly to anyone, not of his choice, jumping on his chest.
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:25 amToffeehater wrote:bigmick wrote:Toffee I see your post count has soared up to fifty nine interjections. Aside from one slightly longer ramble, they are almost all of the one sentence variety, and having studied them all at some length I have come to the conclusion that you are still to make a single point worthy of note.
Either you specialise in wanton buffoonery, you are a wind-up merchant, or you have absolutely no knowledge of the game of Association Football whatsoever. My money is on the second option, with the distinct possibility of a two/three combo. If however you come in good faith and do despite all previous evidence have a modicum of a clue, try waiting your moment and posting something relevent, insightful, or funny even.
I am blessed with a fairly long fuse, too long sometimes but you are managing to achieve something which very few people on here have ever managed, in that you are really getting on my t!ts.
mic i seriously think u have something against me ? back off will ya?
Perhaps you should take more note of the first two lines of Big Micks post.
And ConnO var's follow up btw is good advice.