Liverpool FC Forum

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:02 am**

Is it 76 now ? the other day it was 54 yesterday 67 now its 76 .

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:09 am**

Benny The Noon wrote:Is it 76 now ? the other day it was 54 yesterday 67 now its 76 .

They said 76 on t.v. Either way it is a huge amount of players and proves he has bought mostly craap.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:12 am**

Mostly

? So lets knock off at least 30 players from his list of people cmoing in as they are just kids between the age of 16 and 18 .

That leaves just the players for the first team - who are the :censored:

that have contributed nothing to us while they were here or have been here .

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:17 am**

And to help you out this is the list of players bought for the first team - nowhere near the 76 mark .

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:41 am**

Benny The Noon wrote:And to help you out this is the list of players bought for the first team - nowhere near the 76 mark .

its a poor list, i think it around 67 players Rafa has taken to theclub, there are better list about on the forum or you can just to the lfc website and look them all up.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:47 am**

lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:And to help you out this is the list of players bought for the first team - nowhere near the 76 mark .

its a poor list, i think it around 67 players Rafa has taken to theclub, there are better list about on the forum or you can just to the lfc website and look them all up.

Which players bought solely for the first team ie not kids for the future are missing from the list .

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:53 am**

Benny The Noon wrote:
lakes10 wrote:
Benny The Noon wrote:And to help you out this is the list of players bought for the first team - nowhere near the 76 mark .

its a poor list, i think it around 67 players Rafa has taken to theclub, there are better list about on the forum or you can just to the lfc website and look them all up.

Which players bought solely for the first team ie not kids for the future are missing from the list .

dont matter mate its still 67 players, even if he got a kid at the age of 15 when he got here they would be 20 by now and we should have seen them in the first team, if not it shows they are not up to it.

the fact is that Rafa has spent too much time buying players then trying to build a team that can work.

yes it good that we have young kids but when you look at how they have done when we do use them they are not up to it, look at the gunners, there young kids are outstanding.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:55 am**

Off course it matters - its calledx looking into things a bit more deeply - all clubs constantly bring kids into the team yet not many make it through to the first team - the way people lump these figures about how mnay players have been brought into the club make it sound like they are players for the first team and ignore the fact half are kids to see if they can become future stars .

yes the gunners kids are fantastic - still won f.uck all though in 5 years

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:01 am**

Benny The Noon wrote:Off course it matters - its calledx looking into things a bit more deeply - all clubs constantly bring kids into the team yet not many make it through to the first team - the way people lump these figures about how mnay players have been brought into the club make it sound like they are players for the first team and ignore the fact half are kids to see if they can become future stars .

yes the gunners kids are fantastic - still won f.uck all though in 5 years

no mate but they are making it into the first team and when they are in it they play well.

Posted: **Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:04 am**

Yes they are making the first team - still winning feck all and still finishing below Rafa - lets not forget some of their kids cost a fair bit of money .

Liverpool FC Forum

If we lose to lyon - Will rafa get the sack? (or resign)