Should we have started wiv heskey - I think so
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:13 pmI THINK SO
Liverpool FC Forum
Liverpool Football Club Discussion
https://www.liverpoolfc-newkit.co.uk/
Should we have started wiv heskey - I think so
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 9:13 pmPosted: Sun May 02, 2004 11:37 pmWhat for?, Comedy Value?, Playing the latest version of Top Trumps to see how many times he could fall on his a#se in the first half?... OK, he scored, Jesus, how many this season?, What else did he bring to the party? What else does he ever bring to the party?... Strength, Guille, Finesse, Ball Control, Movement on & off the ball, I'm sorry the Man is just NOT a Liverpool player.... He's got more chance of making Fash's next eleven for the Sunday league team he run's on Bravo, GOD help us if he's in your starting eleven, even "Le Fool" has put him on the bench for our crucial "Must Win Cup Final's", What does that tell you....... What we've all thought since he was signed He's sh##e!
Posted: Sun May 02, 2004 11:43 pmWiv?
You a southerner? or a dunse or something?
He wasn't sh##e when he signed though glenbuck. Far from it. He was probably the catalyst for the cup treble, he was immense all season. The season after he started his decline though and has ever only shown flashes of the brilliance he possesses and that isn't good enough.
You a southerner? or a dunse or something?
He wasn't sh##e when he signed though glenbuck. Far from it. He was probably the catalyst for the cup treble, he was immense all season. The season after he started his decline though and has ever only shown flashes of the brilliance he possesses and that isn't good enough.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 12:28 amBit of a strange question to post but I answered it and said NO 
I would have thought maybe Baros has a stronger shout as a starter but GH went for Kewell and recalled Smicer. We actually played a lot better first half with Kewell and owen up front. Heskey's introduction at half time seemed more to do with a tactical change than anything else.
Second half Michael won the penalty and set up the second for Heskey on a plate. It went a bit flat after that to be fair but 3 points is a welcome 3pts and on we go .
I would have thought maybe Baros has a stronger shout as a starter but GH went for Kewell and recalled Smicer. We actually played a lot better first half with Kewell and owen up front. Heskey's introduction at half time seemed more to do with a tactical change than anything else. Second half Michael won the penalty and set up the second for Heskey on a plate. It went a bit flat after that to be fair but 3 points is a welcome 3pts and on we go .
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 12:29 amGlenbuck ? Why does everything have to come down to a slagging off of Heskey or GH for you in here mate ? 
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:06 amDalglish, 46/47 post's most of them about Shank's,.. any other's you feel I'm totally out of order with?..(oh, sorry we're down to the I don't go to every match scenario again are we?) in answer to your question very simple I don't rate either of them; neither are up to the job, 1: As a 15/20 goal Striker, 2: As a Manager.... Any more questions?, or do you think i'm wrong Answer's on a postcard.... your's p#ssed of with reading PC sh##e rather than addressing the fundamental issue's of what's wrong with the Club I love.
Personal Opinion, Or am I missing the entire point of this forum?
Personal Opinion, Or am I missing the entire point of this forum?
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:12 amHi Glenbuck , my apologies , I was having a rant about the amount of posts that turn into anti Gh or Heskey rants. It wasn't directly a reflection of YOUR posts in here and I realise that may have seemed how it appeared for which I apologise. yours was just the last in a long line..............
i'm not sure what you mean by "I don't go to every match scenario" as I'm not aware i ever make a distinction between those that attend and thiose that don't but i'm sure it came from somewhere but not from me.
i'm not sure what you mean by "I don't go to every match scenario" as I'm not aware i ever make a distinction between those that attend and thiose that don't but i'm sure it came from somewhere but not from me.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:20 amDalglish, you're right sorry mate, It strikes me that you've been following the RED MEN as long as I have, I'm just so Bloody frustrated at what I'm seeeing at the Club it makes the Blood boil, had Family over this weekend so could'nt attend the match but got it on Sky, it's not the same for me anymore under this present regime, watched Barcelona tonight and I fear for us IF we qualify for CL...... It NEVER used to be like that, It was always Bring on the opposition We're Liverpool, now I have to admit if we DO qaulify I'm fearful we're going to get dumped on our a#ses in the qualifiers.
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:26 amHi Gelnbuck , I share your frustrations mate but to be totally honest call me insane or deluded but i'm actually optimistic for next season! !!!!
I remember watching Evans 11 week in and week out and although entertaining i just KNEW we weren't good enough , I used to count 6 players who simply weren't god enough to play for LFC, now its only 3 or 4 !!!LOL
I still maintain its BETTER to be IN the CL and having the chance to maybe surprise a few people than to be OUT and lose OWEN and fail to attract the players we need to challenge for the prem .....
Walk on ..............
I remember watching Evans 11 week in and week out and although entertaining i just KNEW we weren't good enough , I used to count 6 players who simply weren't god enough to play for LFC, now its only 3 or 4 !!!LOL
I still maintain its BETTER to be IN the CL and having the chance to maybe surprise a few people than to be OUT and lose OWEN and fail to attract the players we need to challenge for the prem .....
Walk on ..............
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:36 amDalglish you're probably right... I'll leave you with this joke !(I thought it was funny), it's totally off the beat but it's a Bank Holiday weekend and we WON!
Worst case scenario for any bloke.. You're a Siamese twin, you're brother's GAY and he's got a HOT date tonight problem is you've only got ONE a#sehole!
You're f##ked, Wish I didn't think WE Were!
Worst case scenario for any bloke.. You're a Siamese twin, you're brother's GAY and he's got a HOT date tonight problem is you've only got ONE a#sehole!
You're f##ked, Wish I didn't think WE Were!
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:38 am Nice joke, good to know we scousers haven't lost our sense of humour !!!!Keep the faith man maybe we can suprise a few next season in both the prem and the CL
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:43 amHope so, catch you next time, I'm outa here, missus is doin her NUT!
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:44 amMines pregnant AND ASLEEP !!!!!
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:10 pmI think we should ahve started how we did styart. Hooulierout just seems to really want houllier out! (good name then i guess) but we gotta look at the positives... we did win 3 points against a team that isnt really all that bad. The first half was good, as was the 1st 15 minutes or so of the second half. Id like to see Baros play a little more but Owen did a good job, as did Kewell. When Heskey came on he was never gonna set off any fireworks but he scored a goal and kept the boro players busy so alls good i say 
Posted: Mon May 03, 2004 1:59 pmI WOULD'VE STARTED WITH THE TEAM WE HAD EXCEPT WITH FINNAN ON FOR SMICER. HESKEY IS GOOD TO BRING ON COS HE HS A LOT OF STRENGTH AND HE MIGHT SCORE THE ODD GOAL BUT WE SHOULD STILL SELL HIM WHILE HE'S STILL WORTH A FEW MILLION. IF YOU START HIM I THINK HE'S TOO LIABLE TO ACT THE boll##ks AND MAKE MISTAKES!!