Page 1 of 2
Baros to go on loan
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:40 pmby El Nino_#9
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/4732667.stm
It looks like baros will be goin away on loan for the season.
personally, i think this is the best outcome for liverpool.
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:46 pmby XSD
Is it 
? That's a bad outcome, he could be worth less next season, and we won't have the money Rafa needs to bring in a new centre half and right winger.
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:52 pmby laza
You got to be kidding me, thats worst case scenario
If he cant be sold then might as well keep him
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:55 pmby mighty mo
he,s only got one year left on a contract so why are we not selling,
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:57 pmby El Nino_#9
if baros goes on loan and IMPROVES then we can sell him for a lot more or we can keep him for ourselves. I suppose however we do need the money directly to fund our two transfers.
now i am undecided whether this is a good move or not?? 
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:58 pmby El Nino_#9
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:16 pmby Afroman
if baros goes on loan and IMPROVES then we can sell him for a lot more or we can keep him for ourselves
Shalke want an option to buy in 2006 if he preforms, there is no way Rafa would agree to that.I'd rather he went to Villa for a fee
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:31 pmby JC_81
This is a load of sh.ite.
Letting a player with one year on his contract go on a season long loan is basically giving him away. Considering we're bound to get someone willing to pay around 4-5 mil for him (doubt we'll get the 7mil Rafa wants), there's no way he'll be allowed to go on loan.
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:32 pmby *R*E*D*S*
i think he'd come back to haunt us if he went to villa. i'd rather he went abroad, but the money is the most important thing if rafa wants to improve the side.
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:51 pmby barnesrush
skysports have been saying that schalke believe they will agree a fee soon. loan will undoubtedly not happen unless we have suddenly become as rich as chelsea and started giving players away. is it 12 or 18 months left on baros contract as i keep hearing different?
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 3:55 pmby 7_Kewell
Baros to go on loan, when his contract has only 16 months left on it 
they're having a laugh, there is no way Liverpool will allow that because we won't get the money to replace him. I'd be VERY surprised if we accepted a loan because what will stop them saying they don't want to buy him.....only to sign him next december on a free?
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:44 pmby The Manhattan Project
If we sell him, we get the money and some options to buy new players.
If he goes on loan, we get no player and no money.
F*ck you Schlakeekea 1404 or whatever the f*ck you're called.
You want Baros? Give us the f*cking money!!! 
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:49 pmby Afroman
The Manhattan Project wrote:If we sell him, we get the money and some options to buy new players.
If he goes on loan, we get no player and no money.
F*ck you Schlakeekea 1404 or whatever the f*ck you're called.
You want Baros? Give us the f*cking money!!!
Well said!! Its the only way to do it 
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:12 pmby 7_Kewell
they're taking the pi$$ to be honest....what if he gets injured? They will send him straight back!
i'm sorry, but pay up or pi$$ off!
Posted:
Sun Jul 31, 2005 5:58 pmby mikopool
Pro : he gets alot of exposure to a new market
pro: he may perform better with the German style of play
con: gets injured, ends up leaving on a free transfer
