Lando_Griffin wrote:Toffeehater wrote:banana wrote:This is not Alonso VS Barry.
This is LFC chasing Barry.
Barry is a good player. Well capable of replacing any left sided fullback or midfielder in LFC at the moment. Miles ahead of Riise.
Alonso is a top class midfielder. What is the point in selling one of your very best players if you wan't to win the premiership?
All holding midfielders in both Arsenal, Man U and Chelsea are inferior to Alonso.
Barry would in my opinion be a good signing. A left footed player proven in the premiership. A good professional with good mentality and good attributes.
Porbably get slaughtered for this but whats the point in keeping one of your "best" if they have out of form for 3 seasons? Why keep a player who's not been performing for 3 seasons , and when there might be possible suitors out there willing to buy him?
All holding midfielders in arsenal , chelsea and manure are inferiro to alonso?
Chelsea : Makele -> one of the best , if not the best , controlled gerrard in both legs of the champions league
Manure : Anderson -> Deffo a up and coming star has put in some good performances also
Scholes : Old is gold and look how he has performed since coming back from injury , has been putting in lovely passes , like alonso
Arsenal : Fabregas , Pfa young player of the year , has been superb this season and has really stepped up after the depature of henry
So what was that again abt the other 3 having worse holding midfielders that us ?
When did Fabregas and Scholes become defensive midfielders exactly?
fabregas started his career as a defensive mid and so did scholes , and its flamini who ventures foward more that fabregas id u noticed bad bob . Scholes has been playing has a holding midfielder almost all his career and recently only he has moced foward alot due to be played with hargreaves , anderson and carrick alot