eds » Fri May 24, 2013 11:54 am wrote:So if they can't afford paying him 80k/90k a week, how have they managed to afford him on loan for a season.
They were paying for 100% of his wages, weren't they?
If they weren't we were very stupid to let him go out paying a percentage of his wage to begin with.
RED BEERGOGGLES » Fri May 24, 2013 4:24 pm wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/10072120/West-Ham-have-15-milllion-bid-for-Andy-Carroll-accepted-but-striker-keen-to-make-his-mark-with-Liverpool.html
Carroll held talks with Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers in the last 24 hours when he was informed he could move to Upton Park on a permanent transfer.
Instead, the former Newcastle United forward said he remained determined to prove himself at Anfield despite knowing he would be only a squad player.
Liverpool will have to convince Carroll that it is unlikely he will ever establish himself on Merseyside and he would be wiser to move on.
Carroll scored seven goals during his loan spell at West Ham last season, improving as the campaign progressed to earn an England recall.
He has, however, suffered a heel injury since the final game of the season last weekend, ruling him out of the forthcoming friendlies with the Republic of Ireland and Brazil. He will not be fit again until pre-season training in around six weeks.
Kenny Kan » Tue May 28, 2013 12:00 pm wrote:Who the f.uck sanctioned Carroll's purchase at 35M plus hefty wages?
One of the Worst pieces of business in the history of this club's transfers, and wider football. And now he won't budge, there surely goes part of Rodgers' plans for summer business.
Return to Premiership - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests