ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:27 pm wrote:Eagle » Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:15 pm wrote:Even If Rodgers did want a physical forward in his squad I would hope that he could find a much better player than Carroll. I hope to God Carroll stays at West Ham and starts scoring some goals because at this rate we’ll be spending another summer trying to shift a player whose stock has declined even further.
carroll wasnt worth £35m or anything like it but the fee wasnt his fault.
at the end of last season he was becoming a important player for us, he put in impressive performances against the likes of everton, chelsea and united.
he scored a last minute winner in the biggest derby game in a quarter of a century and nearly single handedly turned around the f.a cup final against the european champions.
much rather have him on the bench to bring on than the likes of borini or morgan.
Yes the fee we paid shouldn’t be used as a stick to beat him with as it has nothing to with him. There are other people to blame for that. But that shouldn’t stop us taking an objective view of Carroll’s ability, and as far as “physical” strikers go, he isn’t actually one of the better ones. Sure he is physically strong but far too many of his other attributes are very poor.
Regardless, there needs to be some sort of strategy behind the squad we assemble and that doesn’t necessarily mean we need a tall one, a short one, a fast one, etc. You can have both a philosophy and variety. This time next week our striking options should include Suarez, Sturridge and a fit again Borini, and they all bring something different to the table. I wouldn’t include Carroll in our match day squad ahead of those 3.