Is Gybs offended by the reference in it ? maybe the mods too ?

aCe' wrote:want me to change mine too Bob ?
Is Gybs offended by the reference in it ? maybe the mods too ?
maypaxvobiscum wrote:aCe' wrote:want me to change mine too Bob ?
Is Gybs offended by the reference in it ? maybe the mods too ?
that word should be censored
aCe' wrote:maypaxvobiscum wrote:aCe' wrote:want me to change mine too Bob ?
Is Gybs offended by the reference in it ? maybe the mods too ?
that word should be censored
oops... my apologies Max, meant Benny the Noon... Silly me always gets the pair of nuts mixed up !
Bad Bob wrote:Judge wrote:aCe' wrote::laugh:
i find the poster annoying not the avatar![]()
Curious. You wish to have Sabre remove his avatar for offensive gestures but not aCe'? Inconsistency noted and original request ignored.
Judge wrote:that was tongue in cheek BOB (see emoticons), you effing know it
yes it is offensve and should be removed. if u like i will scour every members avatar and report it back directly to you, just so u dont think im favouring one more than the other. now please carry out the forum rules please
you seem to just wanna preach forum rules, but do eff all about it when challanged on it
if i get a card for what ive just said then feel free, but be rest assured it wont be warranted at all
Bad Bob wrote:Judge wrote:aCe' wrote::laugh:
i find the poster annoying not the avatar![]()
Curious. You wish to have Sabre remove his avatar for offensive gestures but not aCe'? Inconsistency noted and original request ignored.
Bad Bob wrote:Judge wrote:that was tongue in cheek BOB (see emoticons), you effing know it
yes it is offensve and should be removed. if u like i will scour every members avatar and report it back directly to you, just so u dont think im favouring one more than the other. now please carry out the forum rules please
you seem to just wanna preach forum rules, but do eff all about it when challanged on it
if i get a card for what ive just said then feel free, but be rest assured it wont be warranted at all
Judge, if it's a to-the-letter application of the forum rules you're looking for, I'd prefer to start with the big stuff and work my way down to things like avatars.
So, perhaps we might start with:
Extensive public discussions of moderating decisions will be discouraged. In the past, such discussions have served little purpose other than to derail threads, rehash old grievances and rekindle dormant flame wars. Members are reminded that this board exists first and foremost to discuss football and to share interesting perspectives on the wider world; persistent forum politicking advances neither of these aims and will be shut down. However, broader discussion about the functioning of the forum is acceptable when it is put forward in good faith and when it is not tied to a particular moderating decision.
Or, maybe this:
Certain offenses are more serious than garden variety abuse etc. and will be dealt with swiftly and decisively by the moderators. The following offenses will not be tolerated:
• Overt and spiteful xenophobic, sexist, homophobic or racist remarks
• Insults directed at another poster’s family members
• Insults that mock another poster’s illnesses or personal setbacks
• Threats of violence or hardship directed at another poster in ‘real life’
• Derogatory remarks concerning the Hillsborough or Hysel tragedies
• The posting of images or links that are indecent/pornographic, graphically violent/disturbing or otherwise in very poor taste (the ‘NSFW’ test)
Maybe I should ask everyone to edit all past remarks that run afoul of these particular rules? Maybe once that's all dealt with, we can see about avatars.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests