Liverpool FC Forum

by **Roger Red Hat** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:00 pm

I'd bang it all night

by **laza** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:08 pm

Im with Lee though preferably beforehand, she is judging from that photo a right honey

by **Ben Patrick** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:18 pm

Wooly your funny you mate

She would deffo get it, and thats sober now !

by **GYBS** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:22 pm

Woollyback wrote:anyways... just for you lot, here's our office girl who i'm sure plenty of you might like. but she's a little bit on the hefty side for me i'm afraid

She looks lovely - very pretty nice smile and nice rack

Nowhere near hefty

by **GRAHAM01** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:48 pm

GYBS wrote:
Woollyback wrote:anyways... just for you lot, here's our office girl who i'm sure plenty of you might like. but she's a little bit on the hefty side for me i'm afraid

She looks lovely - very pretty nice smile and nice rack

Nowhere near hefty

totally

nothing wrong with her at all very nice indeed

by **Woollyback** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:15 pm

yeah she's a lovely girl, very nice looking and a right laugh and probably a lot of people's cup of tea. but what i'm getting at is it'd be a dull old world if we all liked the same thing. she's not fat, just a bit heftily built for my liking. just like some women prefer an athletic bloke (footballers etc) whereas other women hate that and prefer a big beefy rugby player type bloke, or some even like the skinny beanpole art/emo type bloke

it's all horses for courses at the end of the day :buttrock

by **Reg** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:24 pm

Lovely girl Wools, where are you based and is she available next weekend?

by **Big Niall** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:25 pm

Exactly.

A very pretty girl but like you a bit too heavy for my own taste.

by **Woollyback** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:26 pm

she lives in manchester but unfortunately for you lot, her fella is about 6 foot 2 and built like a brick sh!thouse

by **Dundalk** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:27 pm

Woollyback wrote:anyways... just for you lot, here's our office girl who i'm sure plenty of you might like. but she's a little bit on the hefty side for me i'm afraid

All day

by **GYBS** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:27 pm

How about just say she isnt my type or not the sort of girl i like or attacts you as opposed to calling her heavy or hefty or fat etc. Bit less insulting .

by **Roger Red Hat** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:30 pm

plump

by **Judge** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:31 pm

Woollyback wrote:she lives in manchester but unfortunately for you lot, her fella is about 6 foot 2 and built like a brick sh!thouse

dont tell him then - simple

by **stmichael** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:32 pm

Banana

The waist measurement is less than 9 inches smaller than the hips or bust measurement. The body has a relatively high androgen level compared to the estrogen level, and this causes the skeleton to develop in a more masculine pattern and body fat to be distributed predominantly in the abdomen, buttocks, chest and face.

Apple

Apple shaped women have broader shoulders and bust, and narrower hips. Apple shaped women have (much) higher androgen levels compared to women with other body types. Because of this high androgen level, the skeleton develops in a masculine pattern. Fat is mainly distributed in the abdomen, chest, and face.

Pear

The hip measurement is greater than the bust measurement. The distribution of fat varies, with fat tending to deposit first in the buttocks, hips and thighs. As body fat percentage increases, an increasing proportion of body fat is distributed around the waist and upper abdomen.

Hourglass

The hip and bust are almost of equal size with a narrow waist. Body fat distribution tends to be around both the upper body and lower body. This body type enlarges the arms, chest, hips and rear before other parts, including waist and upper abdomen. Because of the preference shown to physical symmetry, many celebrities falsely claim hourglass measurements but actually rate closer to a straight figure or apple.

Feel free to disagree, debate, post other samples

by **Reg** » Fri Sep 04, 2009 2:38 pm

Ben Patrick wrote:I think C is overweight.

It depends on what your definition of ideal is - and thats whats stressing folks in this thread.

If you think A is wonderful then logically B is overweight and C must be a hippo.

If conversely C is your ideal figure then she´s not overweight.

As Nan said, different people like different attributes, my wife dieted to reduce her bum and legs and the first thing that disappeared were her boobs - god's little joke.....

C looks a lovely girl and I wouldnt hesitate to ask her out, but I have an active lifestyle and if she joined me in that then she would naturally lose weight as she got fitter. But if she combined fitness with size then what the héll? thats great.

Now, I draw the line at chip shop lardarse with wobbly everythings, but C is not like that.

The folks that argue against C are most likely those who've not met a great girl who is physically on the bigger side. A lovely girl is a lovely girl regardless of whether she´s a size 10, 12 or 16.

I love babes. :buttrock

Liverpool FC Forum

Womans size - Your preference

Womans size - Your preference

Who is online