Kharhaz wrote:NANNY RED wrote:Well im 5 foot tall
Just the right height me thinks !
good things come in little packages
Womans size - Your preference
by Woollyback » Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:58 pm
mistyred wrote:Woollyback wrote:mistyred wrote:Woollyback wrote:Big Niall wrote:Maybe I should make up a story about a fatty who was told she was normal and kept eating pizzas and died of a heart attack in her twenties just because people said it was normal to be fat.
it IS becoming normal and acceptable to be fat, that's the problemthat's why i love france - france doesn't do fatties
The way your talking is as if your gods gift to the world.
We all have our faults you lot are a fu#cking disgrace the kind that act like you haven't got a mother
yeah whatever sunshine. you like girls who are technically overweight, i don't. deal with it
Dont call me f'ckin sinshine, you seem to think your some f'ckin flange god with f'ckin 4 eyes, and have a cheek to speak about women like your a f'ckin god.
Don't make me laugh boy. a couple of pics of women and dream like stories doesn't make you brad f'ckin pitt.You deal with it sunshine.
F'ckin idiot, the Flangmeister f'ckin geek
yeah keep it coming sunshine
four eyes, oooh that really hurts
b*ll*c*ks and s*i*e
-
Woollyback - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 12400
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Manchester
by account deleted by request » Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:00 pm
As you get older you realise that looks are a passing phase, while loyalty, a good sense of humour and a nice personality will still be valued long after their looks have faded.
I think some of you are too fussy, I would happily see to all three, but especially "b" as she obviously has the nicest personality.
I think some of you are too fussy, I would happily see to all three, but especially "b" as she obviously has the nicest personality.
- account deleted by request
- Posts: 20690
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am
by NANNY RED » Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:02 pm
s@int wrote:As you get older you realise that looks are a passing phase, while loyalty, a good sense of humour and a nice personality will still be valued long after their looks have faded.
I think some of you are too fussy, I would happily see to all three, but especially "b" as she obviously has the nicest personality.
when you get to your age though yeh can only look
theres nothin else down for you HE WHO BETRAYS WILL ALWAYS WALK ALONE
-
NANNY RED - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 13334
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:45 pm
by account deleted by request » Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:11 pm
NANNY RED wrote:s@int wrote:As you get older you realise that looks are a passing phase, while loyalty, a good sense of humour and a nice personality will still be valued long after their looks have faded.
I think some of you are too fussy, I would happily see to all three, but especially "b" as she obviously has the nicest personality.
when you get to your age though yeh can only look
Things just take a little longer as you get older, it now takes me all night to do what I used to do all night
Thats why god gave us viagra Nanny
- account deleted by request
- Posts: 20690
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am
by Ben Patrick » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:20 am
Fckin ell all the people gettin on their high horses at Niall here
To be fair the people who say derogatory comments about thin women are just as bad, but the press dont over publicise it as its easy to criticise someone who labels another person fat.
I think C is overweight.
I still would though.
I had an ex that was really thin and people kept commentin on her weight, hurt her so much, they never understood or thought anything of it.
Yes its wrong to comment on someones weight if they are fatter or thinner than the public perception of normality but why is it one rule for fat and one for thin ?
Whatever i think or even Niall for that matter is irrelavent, the only relevance it will have is if he sees girl C and states his opinion to her
I bet he wouldnt despite his views.
So f'ckin ell get off all the high horses and leave people to their opinions.
To be fair the people who say derogatory comments about thin women are just as bad, but the press dont over publicise it as its easy to criticise someone who labels another person fat.
I think C is overweight.
I still would though.
I had an ex that was really thin and people kept commentin on her weight, hurt her so much, they never understood or thought anything of it.
Yes its wrong to comment on someones weight if they are fatter or thinner than the public perception of normality but why is it one rule for fat and one for thin ?
Whatever i think or even Niall for that matter is irrelavent, the only relevance it will have is if he sees girl C and states his opinion to her
I bet he wouldnt despite his views.
So f'ckin ell get off all the high horses and leave people to their opinions.
Sabre looks like a big lezzer
-
Ben Patrick - Posts: 3933
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:47 pm
- Location: Liverpool
by laza » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:56 am
Ben Patrick wrote:Fckin ell all the people gettin on their high horses at Niall here
To be fair the people who say derogatory comments about thin women are just as bad, but the press dont over publicise it as its easy to criticise someone who labels another person fat.
I think C is overweight.
I still would though.
I had an ex that was really thin and people kept commentin on her weight, hurt her so much, they never understood or thought anything of it.
Yes its wrong to comment on someones weight if they are fatter or thinner than the public perception of normality but why is it one rule for fat and one for thin ?
Whatever i think or even Niall for that matter is irrelavent, the only relevance it will have is if he sees girl C and states his opinion to her
I bet he wouldnt despite his views.
So f'ckin ell get off all the high horses and leave people to their opinions.
LOL oh well thats told us, its back to the Sheltand pony for me
Forever Red in this life and the next
-
laza - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 8408
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am
- Location: The Sharkbait captial of the world
by account deleted by request » Fri Sep 04, 2009 6:21 am
Large thighs 'may protect heart'
The crucial measurement is taken just below the bottom
Men and women with thighs over 60cm (23.6in) in circumference have a lower risk of heart disease and early death, a study of 3,000 people suggests.
The relationship remains even when body fat, smoking and blood cholesterol are taken into account, a Danish team says.
Those with narrow thighs may not have enough muscle mass to deal with insulin properly, raising the risk of diabetes and, in turn, heart disease, they say.
Some said it was too early to change current advice on eating and exercise for heart health, but the researchers said thigh size could be used as a marker for at-risk patients.
The study, published in the British Medical Journal, followed men and women in Denmark for more than 10 years.
They were measured for height, weight and thigh, hip and waist circumference and their overall percentage of body fat was calculated.
It's a very simple, very crude measure but it seems to have an individual effect. And it may be a way for doctors to assess risk
Professor Berit Heitmann, Copenhagen University Hospital
The thigh measurement was taken just below the gluteal fold, which is the crease caused by your buttocks.
Researchers also looked at the activity levels of the participants, whether they smoked, their blood pressure and cholesterol levels.
They then monitored incidence of heart disease over 10 years and death rates over 12-and-a-half years.
'Crude measure'
During this time, 257 men and 155 women died, 263 men and 140 women developed cardiovascular disease and 103 men and 34 women suffered from heart disease.
The team at the Copenhagen University Hospital found that those with the smallest thighs - below 55cm - had twice the risk of early death or serious health problems.
Professor Berit Heitmann, who led the research, said: "The increased risk was independent of abdominal and general obesity and lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure.
"Additionally we found that the risk was more highly related to thigh circumference than to waist circumference.
HOW TO INCREASE YOUR THIGHS
Go to a gym and train three times a week
Exercise all the muscles in your thighs
Use a weight you can only just lift 10 times in a row
Over 3 months you will increase thighs by 6% to 10%
Source: Loughborough University
"It's a very simple, very crude measure but it seems to have an individual effect. And it may be a way for doctors to assess risk.
"The nice thing is that if you have a small thigh you can do something about it through exercise."
Previous studies have suggested that a waist circumference of over 35in (88.9cm) for a woman and 40in (101.6cm) for a man indicated a high risk of developing diabetes and heart disease.
Professor Heitmann's team says the risk of narrow thighs could be associated with too little muscle mass.
They say this can lead to the body not responding to insulin properly, increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes and, in the long-run, heart disease.
Too little fat can also lead to adverse changes in the way the body breaks down food.
'Great news'
British Heart Foundation senior cardiac nurse Judy O'Sullivan said: "There is insufficient evidence to confirm that a low thigh circumference affects a person's risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
"However, low muscle mass is associated with low levels of physical activity which is an established risk factor for developing heart disease."
Tam Fry, of the National Obesity Forum, agreed that the research needed further corroboration, saying: "This is a very interesting and slightly counter-intuitive piece of work but it has to be respected because of the numbers looked at and the duration of the research.
"This must be great news for people with larger thighs. What I find fascinating is that researchers are now going back to the drawing board and looking for every possible way of mitigating obesity."
bbc health
The crucial measurement is taken just below the bottom
Men and women with thighs over 60cm (23.6in) in circumference have a lower risk of heart disease and early death, a study of 3,000 people suggests.
The relationship remains even when body fat, smoking and blood cholesterol are taken into account, a Danish team says.
Those with narrow thighs may not have enough muscle mass to deal with insulin properly, raising the risk of diabetes and, in turn, heart disease, they say.
Some said it was too early to change current advice on eating and exercise for heart health, but the researchers said thigh size could be used as a marker for at-risk patients.
The study, published in the British Medical Journal, followed men and women in Denmark for more than 10 years.
They were measured for height, weight and thigh, hip and waist circumference and their overall percentage of body fat was calculated.
It's a very simple, very crude measure but it seems to have an individual effect. And it may be a way for doctors to assess risk
Professor Berit Heitmann, Copenhagen University Hospital
The thigh measurement was taken just below the gluteal fold, which is the crease caused by your buttocks.
Researchers also looked at the activity levels of the participants, whether they smoked, their blood pressure and cholesterol levels.
They then monitored incidence of heart disease over 10 years and death rates over 12-and-a-half years.
'Crude measure'
During this time, 257 men and 155 women died, 263 men and 140 women developed cardiovascular disease and 103 men and 34 women suffered from heart disease.
The team at the Copenhagen University Hospital found that those with the smallest thighs - below 55cm - had twice the risk of early death or serious health problems.
Professor Berit Heitmann, who led the research, said: "The increased risk was independent of abdominal and general obesity and lifestyle and cardiovascular risk factors such as blood pressure.
"Additionally we found that the risk was more highly related to thigh circumference than to waist circumference.
HOW TO INCREASE YOUR THIGHS
Go to a gym and train three times a week
Exercise all the muscles in your thighs
Use a weight you can only just lift 10 times in a row
Over 3 months you will increase thighs by 6% to 10%
Source: Loughborough University
"It's a very simple, very crude measure but it seems to have an individual effect. And it may be a way for doctors to assess risk.
"The nice thing is that if you have a small thigh you can do something about it through exercise."
Previous studies have suggested that a waist circumference of over 35in (88.9cm) for a woman and 40in (101.6cm) for a man indicated a high risk of developing diabetes and heart disease.
Professor Heitmann's team says the risk of narrow thighs could be associated with too little muscle mass.
They say this can lead to the body not responding to insulin properly, increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes and, in the long-run, heart disease.
Too little fat can also lead to adverse changes in the way the body breaks down food.
'Great news'
British Heart Foundation senior cardiac nurse Judy O'Sullivan said: "There is insufficient evidence to confirm that a low thigh circumference affects a person's risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
"However, low muscle mass is associated with low levels of physical activity which is an established risk factor for developing heart disease."
Tam Fry, of the National Obesity Forum, agreed that the research needed further corroboration, saying: "This is a very interesting and slightly counter-intuitive piece of work but it has to be respected because of the numbers looked at and the duration of the research.
"This must be great news for people with larger thighs. What I find fascinating is that researchers are now going back to the drawing board and looking for every possible way of mitigating obesity."
bbc health
- account deleted by request
- Posts: 20690
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am
by Woollyback » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:35 pm
anyways... just for you lot, here's our office girl who i'm sure plenty of you might like. but she's a little bit on the hefty side for me i'm afraid
b*ll*c*ks and s*i*e
-
Woollyback - >> LFC Elite Member <<
- Posts: 12400
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Manchester
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests
-
- Advertisement