Liverpool FC Forum

by **Dundalk** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:42 pm

aCe' wrote:question: Does anyone seriously think Kuyt will score and create as many goals next season ?

In a word yes

by **dawson99** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:43 pm

bigmick wrote:But Daws, who is saying we should sell kuyt as of now? Tell me, and I'll join in with the lambasting.

magusqat, unless it was sarcasm, and if so.. we REALLY need that new sarcasm smiley

by **bigmick** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:43 pm

You see in reality NOBODY is saying we should sell Kuyt. NOBODY hates kuyt. Some people however, think Torres and Gerrard are more important to the team than Dirk is. THAT is the only question which was being debated, until people started being silly.

by **account deleted by request** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:45 pm

dawson99 wrote:No saint, its from people saying we should sell Kuyt as he wont do it again, stupid comments deserve stupid retorts, want me to make it simpler for you next time?

Who has said we should sell Kuyt because he won't do it again ? where and when? Or are you reading things that arn't there again Dawson ?

by **dawson99** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:47 pm

maguskwt wrote:
bigmick wrote:What amazes me about some "so called fans" (sorry I couldn't resist) is even though we've just sold Alonso for twice as much as we were hawking him around Europe for 12 months ago, they still don't get the concept of a players value fluctuating. Even though we spunked 8 million quid on keane in about 7 months due to a fluctuation in form/a chronically bad decision to sign him ion the first place, even though we've spunked a large part of the 7 million quid we paid for Dossena, they still don't get it.

It works like this lads. If you buy a striker to score goals, and he proves to be not very good at it, you can take it as red that his value goes down. If he subsequently scores goals and does a decent job at right midfield, his value goes up If you buy a left back who is useless, his value goes down. If he subsequently plays well at left mid, his value climbs. I ask these people sometimes to post about football, but really I should just leave them in their own little world. Totally, absolutely and completely devoid of any clue whatsoever .

playing along those lines... maybe we should sell kuyt? nobody believes he's gonna repeat last year's form anwyay...

and then buy David Silva...

by **GYBS** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:48 pm

Nobody Mick ?!? really - i bet there the is still some out there - read through thread - plenty there and i bet some people still think the same as they did this time lasy year .

by **account deleted by request** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:52 pm

dawson99 wrote:
maguskwt wrote:
bigmick wrote:What amazes me about some "so called fans" (sorry I couldn't resist) is even though we've just sold Alonso for twice as much as we were hawking him around Europe for 12 months ago, they still don't get the concept of a players value fluctuating. Even though we spunked 8 million quid on keane in about 7 months due to a fluctuation in form/a chronically bad decision to sign him ion the first place, even though we've spunked a large part of the 7 million quid we paid for Dossena, they still don't get it.

It works like this lads. If you buy a striker to score goals, and he proves to be not very good at it, you can take it as red that his value goes down. If he subsequently scores goals and does a decent job at right midfield, his value goes up If you buy a left back who is useless, his value goes down. If he subsequently plays well at left mid, his value climbs. I ask these people sometimes to post about football, but really I should just leave them in their own little world. Totally, absolutely and completely devoid of any clue whatsoever .

playing along those lines... maybe we should sell kuyt? nobody believes he's gonna repeat last year's form anwyay...

and then buy David Silva...

I think you know that was sarcasm mate, unless you really do need things made simpler

by **bigmick** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:52 pm

GYBS wrote:Nobody Mick ?!? really - i bet there the is still some out there - read through thread - plenty there and i bet some people still think the same as they did this time lasy year .

OK you're probnably right mate and I'm being silly. Nobody thinks that kuyt is as important to the team as Gerrard and Torres because that would instantly establish them once and for all as being a clueless numpty, I give in, you're right.

by **dawson99** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:55 pm

u all suck, Kuyts awesome, and will proove it again :;):

by **GYBS** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:55 pm

bigmick wrote:
GYBS wrote:Nobody Mick ?!? really - i bet there the is still some out there - read through thread - plenty there and i bet some people still think the same as they did this time lasy year .

OK you're probnably right mate and I'm being silly. Nobody thinks that kuyt is as important to the team as Gerrard and Torres because that would instantly establish them once and for all as being a clueless numpty, I give in, you're right.

I guess that makes me and Rafa clueless numpties then

Still no comment on his goal scoring as a striker in his first season then ?

by **dawson99** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:58 pm

GYBS wrote:
bigmick wrote:
GYBS wrote:Nobody Mick ?!? really - i bet there the is still some out there - read through thread - plenty there and i bet some people still think the same as they did this time lasy year .

OK you're probnably right mate and I'm being silly. Nobody thinks that kuyt is as important to the team as Gerrard and Torres because that would instantly establish them once and for all as being a clueless numpty, I give in, you're right.

I guess that makes me and Rafa clueless numpties then

Still no comment on his goal scoring as a striker in his first season then ?

they only use stats when it suits, which is why 92% of all stats are pointless

by **bigmick** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:59 pm

GYBS wrote:
bigmick wrote:
GYBS wrote:Nobody Mick ?!? really - i bet there the is still some out there - read through thread - plenty there and i bet some people still think the same as they did this time lasy year .

OK you're probnably right mate and I'm being silly. Nobody thinks that kuyt is as important to the team as Gerrard and Torres because that would instantly establish them once and for all as being a clueless numpty, I give in, you're right.

I guess that makes me and Rafa clueless numpties then

Still no comment on his goal scoring as a striker in his first season then ?

OK lets take them in order.

Number one. Are you seriosuly trying to suggest that Rafa agrees with your ridiculous stance? If he does, he is as big a numpty as you are.

Number two. Twelve goals from a season playing up top in a big four team aint that great mate. That's the best season he had too. If you want to persist with the fallacy that he was actually good up top (I don't think even Dirk himself would agree with you) that's lovely, but the stats don'e really back you up.

Next :laugh:

by **account deleted by request** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:01 pm

KUYT scored 14 goals in total in his first season. Crouch scored 18 that same season. Cisse scored 19 the season before that ......... your point being that Kuyt didn't score as many as Cisse or Crouch ?

by **bigmick** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:03 pm

s@int wrote:KUYT scored 14 goals in total in his first season. Crouch scored 18 that same season. Cisse scored 19 the season before that ......... your point being that Kuyt didn't score as many as Cisse or Crouch ?

the daft thing is S@int, we are ALL accepting he's a decnt right midfielder, but his defence council want to talk about his time as a striker :laugh:

Thank God Gerrard didn't employ these feckers to represent him, he'd have been 45 before he saw the light of day again :laugh:

by **dawson99** » Fri Aug 07, 2009 4:04 pm

i never say he should be a striker. i say he deserves some goddam respect from you reprobates who seem to knock him at every turn

Liverpool FC Forum

Dirk kuyt - Peace everyone

Who is online