Liverpool FC Forum

GYBS wrote:

s@int wrote:

GYBS wrote:New rules seems fair enough to me . Hopefully the hostility seen over the last couple of weeks will die down once football starts proper .

Excessive  use of one-line posts, smileys or images, disrupting the flow of threads   

You are already walking dangerously close to the edge mate 

I agree GYBS, hopefully once the season starts we can get back to moaning and groaning about the team and abusing the referee and not each other.

from what i have seen over the last week mate it seems someone else has taken my crown and got a new updated AK-47 - come in el nino your time is up 

Your guns just burnt out boyo!
You'll be back shooting rounds at a rate never seen by mankind when your new one arrives off ebay!!

Number 9 wrote:

GYBS wrote:

s@int wrote:

GYBS wrote:New rules seems fair enough to me . Hopefully the hostility seen over the last couple of weeks will die down once football starts proper .

Excessive  use of one-line posts, smileys or images, disrupting the flow of threads   

You are already walking dangerously close to the edge mate 

I agree GYBS, hopefully once the season starts we can get back to moaning and groaning about the team and abusing the referee and not each other.

from what i have seen over the last week mate it seems someone else has taken my crown and got a new updated AK-47 - come in el nino your time is up 

Your guns just burnt out boyo!
You'll be back shooting rounds at a rate never seen by mankind when your new one arrives off ebay!!

Nah sorry to disappoint you mate but AK-47 well and truely retired for good and mantle been passed over to el nino 

Lando_Griffin wrote:

Woollyback wrote:how'd i guess fantaboy and lando would be the first ones to wade in on this thread 

loud and clear, and understood bob. now fuck off the lot of ya 

Well I am the reason why the blubbers and whimperers wanted a rule-change.

Funny that - I thought the mods were supposed to be biased towards me...?     

I bet it doesn't stop the procession to get me banned, though.

Just to clarify - so long as there's no directed swearing or derogatory comments about a poster's sexual orientation (how WILL I cope?), then I can still call someone a copious waste of faecal matter?

And BigMick's constant stream of bullpat whereby he paraphrases others yet manages to miss all of the key points whilst adding his own mentalist take, is to be an advisory/cardable offence, seeing as it is there purely to rile others?

Goody gumdrops.

Lando if you dont like the posters on this forum then why dont go find somewhere else to post your filth?

Simple enough isnt it... you pi$$ people off, they object, you're even ruder back then you complain people dont like you.

You said you're successful and affluent... now if 'sophistication' is on that list of worthy attributes then you'd understand what I'm on about and change your tedious ways.

If its not on the list then we have to pray you get banned soon. 

No need to change the rules just for you, if you cant follow the rules of the forum that everyone abides by then even you realise its an unsupportable situation.

bigmick wrote:One thing which wasn't covered Bob was polls. If you call someone a c... in a poll, is it Ok? You know the kind of thing, Do you bigMick is either a) a c... b) a total c... c) a complete c... etc etc. Might as well get things all clarified up while we're at it, save any ambiguity later 

That reminds me, I never did get a response to this question. What IS the score with polls in the new rules  Apparently in the old rules you could largely say what you wanted and call anyone you wanted, anything you wanted and it was OK in a poll, is that still the case 

dawson99 wrote:calling someone a c... is the same, in english, morse code or in a poll in my opinion...

Well I must admit I kind of used to think the same but you know, now I'm not so sure Seems especially pointless though when the bloke you are calling a c... has already been banned for having an argument with you as well.

Bad Bob wrote:Apologies, Mick, I didn't realize it was a serious question.  Under the new rules, abuse via polls will not be tolerated.  As a reminder, neither will excessive spamming of threads questioning Mod decisions.  Brace yourselves for a brave new world where football discussion and having a laugh is far more important than rehashing board politics at every opportunity.

You do realise that the    smilie has been newly adopted as the sarcastic one Bob 

s@int wrote:

Bad Bob wrote:Apologies, Mick, I didn't realize it was a serious question.  Under the new rules, abuse via polls will not be tolerated.  As a reminder, neither will excessive spamming of threads questioning Mod decisions.  Brace yourselves for a brave new world where football discussion and having a laugh is far more important than rehashing board politics at every opportunity.

You do realise that the    smilie has been newly adopted as the sarcastic one Bob 

Was there I poll I missed?  Could we vote on it?  Where's the transparency?  Arghhh!       

NANNY RED wrote:Well im calling attention here like , that Saint an Joe an Bav are winding me up , with mathermatical thingys , / an {. im just gonna say . BAS,TARDOS ., Thats not swearing in English so i should be ok 

Yeah but at leat we can say it in bold Nanny