Judge wrote:GYBS wrote:red37 wrote:im getting ludicrous pm's and its doing my head in
plus some folk were banned, especially those from down under
here you are dawson - the easy read post
ta dude

Judge wrote:GYBS wrote:red37 wrote:im getting ludicrous pm's and its doing my head in
plus some folk were banned, especially those from down under
here you are dawson - the easy read post
dawson99 wrote:GYBS wrote:It seems that way mate - the pms he has said he has got are the most shocking things that stand out for me - no one should ever read that stuff sent to them .
Is it really that shocking? Its words on a forum. not nice words and rightly banned but only words...
lets move on, and if u r banned and keep coming back as different people, get a life, move on, serve your time then come back later
bigmick wrote:And meanwhile while we are banning Liverpool fans who don't toe the party line, in the football part of the forum as of now there are a couple of fairly obviously non-Liverpool supporters posting right now. World's gone mad.
bigmick wrote:And meanwhile while we are banning Liverpool fans who don't toe the party line, in the football part of the forum as of now there are a couple of fairly obviously non-Liverpool supporters posting right now. World's gone mad.
GYBS wrote:bigmick wrote:And meanwhile while we are banning Liverpool fans who don't toe the party line, in the football part of the forum as of now there are a couple of fairly obviously non-Liverpool supporters posting right now. World's gone mad.
yes all the new guys do seem very suspect in a few ways .
supersub wrote:GYBS wrote:bigmick wrote:And meanwhile while we are banning Liverpool fans who don't toe the party line, in the football part of the forum as of now there are a couple of fairly obviously non-Liverpool supporters posting right now. World's gone mad.
yes all the new guys do seem very suspect in a few ways .
you wander wether it's newly banned members re-joining
supersub wrote:Nobody was banned for not towing the party line
Have a box full of PM's that indicate why certain individuals will stayed banned
s@int wrote:The way I see it is that Ace was banned for simply saying what most people have been saying for years.... that the mancs are a better team than we are.
Every time Mick , peewee , myself etc etc said that we had a good enough team to be challenging for the title, then people would come out defending Rafa by saying that our team wasn't good enough, we hadn't got enough £20million plus players, we couldn't compete with the mancs or Chelsea financially and that both Chelsea and the mancs had too many world class players for us.
Now seemingly the team has been transformed magically into a better team than the mancs or Chelsea's and anyone saying differently or questioning this FACT is obviously a manc or a WUM?
As for Heimdall and Legs', I think they have both taken a lot of "stick" and while I like and respect Ciggy, Nanny and Barry, IF Heimdall and Legs were to be banned , then so should Ciggy and Barry (possibly Nanny too?) because they were giving it out just as much if not more than Heimdall and Leg's.
As for PM's they are supposed to be private and shouldn't be posted, but if people are ashamed of what they put in them, then maybe they shouldn't have put them in a PM either. As far as I am aware however there is nothing to stop someone posting their OWN PM's or posting one on behalf of someone when a PM has been called into question?
As for biased moderation, we ALL KNOW IT GOES ON. When I was asked I turned it down BECAUSE I knew that I couldn't be impartial and unbiased, and that if it ever came to a point where I should be banning a mate ....... I WOULDN'T. Maybe some other people should have asked themselves the same question.
The mod's do a very difficult job well, but at times they get it wrong, and maybe they should be a little more willing to accept the fact and learn from their mistakes.
BTW I thought it was a penalty...... just! but I also thought that Masch was kicked and it was a free kick. If we don't win the league it won't be because the mancs got a penalty, it will be because WE threw away points earlier in the season.
bigmick wrote:In that, Magus said he thought it was unfair that four people got banned for doing what they did. I agree with him.
bigmick wrote:It's probably worth remembering though that Bam wasn't on the forum yesterday when four people got banned.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests