Liverpool FC Forum

by **dawson99** » Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:48 am

by **Sabre** » Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:50 pm

Funny.

I think one day physics will allow to "scape" from the gravitationary field and make a device that "levitates". That would be great.

by **Judge** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:10 pm

its easy sabre

transverse the gravitational field in opposite polarity to earths using an electrical coil , then phase shift it. however, as the gravity field of the earth fluctuates, you would need a sensor to detect changes and make adjustments to the power field to maintain a floating status

that is how to achieve levitation

by **Sabre** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:02 pm

What? the antigravity has been discovered and can be achieved? Gravity field has a polarity like the Magnetic field? I didn't know the gravitational field fluctuated beyond the changes of the square of the distance to the gravitational centre!! And I didn't know you could interact with gravity field using an electric coil like you can create a magnetic field!!

I did know that you can make something levitate using magnetic fields under a controlled environment, but nothing like the huge achievement you describe.

Fúck, then yes, it's easy!

The guy that has discovered all that has a nobel prize for sure ?

P.S. Cheers for the info, my physics knowledge is basic, secondary studies + the physics for computers.

by **Judge** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:18 pm

Sabre wrote:What? the antigravity has been discovered and can be achieved? Gravity field has a polarity like the Magnetic field? I didn't know the gravitational field fluctuated beyond the changes of the square of the distance to the gravitational centre!! And I didn't know you could interact with gravity field using an electric coil like you can create a magnetic field!!

I did know that you can make something levitate using magnetic fields under a controlled environment, but nothing like the huge achievement you describe.

Fúck, then yes, it's easy! The guy that has discovered all that has a nobel prize for sure ?

P.S. Cheers for the info, my physics knowledge is basic, secondary studies + the physics for computers.

basic physics - north pole and south pole (polarity)

the gravitational field fluctuates - yes

stronger at the poles than around the equator mate

the suns influence has a direct effect on that field also

all that has to be taken into consideration

i assume sabre you take me serious, or are you taking the :censored:

?

i find this subject highly stimulating and have several novel theories, although the math involved is very complex, but the fundamental principles are simple. one of these theories was used (in arguments) in my brothers thesis when he did Physics at cambridge

by **Sabre** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:30 pm

I take your post as serious as can be taken a general chat post Judge, if you ask me if I'm laughing at you in an insulting way, no, that's not what I meant. Not now, not yesterday, not tomorrow. I have a lot of respect to you since the day I learnt you do things as useful as helping people who can't listen, Judge.

That is, I wasn't sure how serious you were talking about that or if you had made a typo error in that post. This is what I know of basic physics

basic physics - north pole and south pole (polarity)

Yes, the magnetic field has a north pole and a south pole. The earth is like a big magnet. If you cut a magnet in two pieces, you won't rip apart the north pole, you won't have monopolarity, but another south pole will be created in the smaller piece magnet. Some theories say that monopolarity in magnetic fields exist, but it hasn't been discovered yet.

As for the gravitational field, in my country it hasn't two poles.

the gravitational field fluctuates - yes

No, it doesn't, it's always proportional to the square of the distance to the gravity centre.

stronger at the poles than around the equator mate

This is because the earth is not a perfect circle and and actually, in the poles you are closer to the gravity centre than the equator. But if you're fixed in a position, the gravity field doesn't fluctuate.

the suns influence has a direct effect on that field also

Correct, the sun has an impact BOTH in the gravity field, and, the magnetic field.

Not taking the píss, just making sure I had understood what you said. However, Judge, we're probably talking about the same thing using different words or using the verb fluctuate with a different interpretation . I think that what you wrote in the first post would be possible if where you wrote gravitational field, you had written magnetic field.

Maybe it was a typo error?

Anyhow, not taking the píss of you. Sorry if I offended you.

by **Judge** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:09 pm

sabre - when an atomic bomb is primed for detonation it has to have the earths gravitational field programmed into it so it will go off. a bomb that would go off in the northern hemisphere, will not in the southern area, unless its programmed to do so

this theory can be attributed to the field and levitation devices. the field must be phase shifted to allow for this discrepancy

i do know a little of this subject, and i feel my theory is correct

by **Sabre** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:13 pm

Fair enough then

I don't have the knowledge to discuss physics with property, and I preffer to discuss anything else today, so thanks for the info.

by **dawson99** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:23 pm

my thread was a funny

by **Sabre** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:28 pm

Sorry Dawson. Here you have another succesful example of levitation

by **dawson99** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:57 pm

cheers dude

by **Judge** » Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:03 pm

Sabre wrote:Sorry Dawson. Here you have another succesful example of levitation

see sabre thats what im talking about

by **Sabre** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:08 pm

Edit.

by **Judge** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:21 pm

Sabre wrote:
Judge wrote:
Sabre wrote:Sorry Dawson. Here you have another succesful example of levitation

see sabre thats what im talking about

Judgey. I never tried to wind you up when I forgot after 100 pages that your Madrid thread was meant to be for the whole draw and I followed up a thread.

If I really wanted to wind you up, the other day I would have ridiculed you in this thread. Where, you first try to be an smart árse about levitation and physics, you then write utter physic nonsense, you then fail to admit the truth, and you even dare to boast about dunno what guy studying in Cambridge. Ah, and that your theories were correct, when you don't even have the knowledge of a school boy.

Yes, this thread and your thread incident prove me you have massive and badly understood concept of pride. It would be extremely easy for me to wind you up while I have a laugh.

No, Judgey, normally when I see total fúckwittery I move on in this forum. But I notice you want to wind me up in the how you look like thread. Do you really want I start winding you up well and proper and see who loses the calmness first?

I reckon it's gonna be you. So be a good boy, eat your stupid pride a bit, and stop your nonsense.

sabre why is this thread related to madrid one?

no i aint a smart ar'se. i do know physics and i try to provide a good analysis. thats my opinion.

my thread was not your concern, it was my argument in the madrid one and you involved yourself.

do not try to wind me up boy, as i have NOT done it to you!! ok.

please do not reply to any of my posts anymore - keep your distance from me

by **Judge** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 6:38 pm

i am disappointed in sabre. thought he was a good guy and up for a laugh from time to time

Liverpool FC Forum

Levitation - It s real!

Who is online