Liverpool FC Forum

by **Judge** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:37 pm

dawson99 wrote:
Judge wrote:if drugs were legal then i think there'd be more wife bashing

That is possibly the stupidest comment I have ever heard mate.

For one, if more people were stoned there would be less wife bashing i think. Alcohol is the main reason for spousal abuse in the world.

that was meant tongue in cheek dawson

niall said that drunks bash wives. alcohol is legal

therefore, is it correct to say if drugs were also legalised, would that lead to more wife bashing as more folk may do it (take drugs that is) if they thought they'd never be imprisoned for taking the drugs in the first place!!

there are people who dont take drugs purely because they value their freedom from prison. if that was not an issue for them - then perhaps??

no one knows what effects drugs have some people and others etc

by **Bad Bob** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:50 pm

GYBS wrote:he has been banned and rightly so - should be for longer in my eyes . All drug users should be banned for life in my eyes - performancing enhancing or not .

Phelps Ban

I find it interesting that he was banned for presumably smoking pot. Now, I know and you know that it was 99% likely to be pot but a 3-month ban based on a presumption made from a photograph seems more than a little flimsy to me. Laza's right, the outpouring of misplaced moral outrage on this issue is approaching Superbowl Tittygate proportions. A lad in his 20s isn't allowed to let loose a little just because he's won a bunch of gold medals? Seems pretty harsh to me.

by **Judge** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:54 pm

its totally amazing that after a small smoke on the potty pipe, phelps looks almost like bad bob:

Liverpool FC Forum

So phelp smokes. overreaction? - Yes? no?

So phelp smokes. overreaction? - Yes? no?

Who is online