If the kuwaities did take us over.... - Who would be the best manager?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Bermenstein » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:25 am

Fergie :p
Image
User avatar
Bermenstein
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Location: Dublin

Postby maypaxvobiscum » Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:27 pm

bigmick wrote:If we were genuinely able to compete for the Kaka's, the Robhinho's, the Ronaldhino's, indeed any O's instead of Ronaldo's, would that be for Rafa?

can we have Micky Robaldinho too?  :D
User avatar
maypaxvobiscum
 
Posts: 9665
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:02 am
Location: Singapore

Postby HacksawJimDuggin » Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:44 pm

100% Rafa.
HacksawJimDuggin
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 1016
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:20 pm

Postby Owzat » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:08 pm

Judge wrote:owzat - the stats say thats 10 :D

We all know S@int's worth ten of any manager!  :D
Never buy from PC World, product quality is poor and their 'customer service' is even poorer
User avatar
Owzat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7487
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:55 am
Location: England

Postby Reg » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:29 pm

The_Rock wrote:
If the kuwaities did take us over...., Who would be the best manager?


one word..........mourinho.

He is a d1ckhead....but if u want the league ...he is the man.

Agree even though I can hardly read your posts due the snot green colour.
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13710
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Ciggy » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:30 pm

Reg wrote:I can hardly read your posts due the snot green colour.

:D
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby Sabre » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:32 pm

On the question whether under more favourable signing conditions Rafa would be the proper man, the answer is, yes, obviously (obvious for me, that is).

With Torres the club beat a record in spending, meaning that previous to that signing Rafa wasn't having the spending power to bring a Torres or a Villa. Even when he had, he had to pick the unsafe (cheaper) option, as you can't forget that Torres has world class reputation after coming to liverpool, not before.

Having more spending power and less restraints would make his manager side of his job easier, he would make quicker deals, he wouldn't have to have signed patches like he used to in the first years, and he'd have to do less "gambles".

Yes, because when you sign a Robben or a Ronaldo that's not a gamble, they're well known. When you sign a player like Riera from a mid team, you are gambling. Sometimes the gambles will go well, and sometimes not (ministry of sound players). The more money you have, the less gambles you'll make, the easier will be that part of your job.

So yes, in case the Kuwaities come, I still think Rafa would be the best option. I trust the man in the tactics part and as a coach, and having less restraints would only make his job easier.
Last edited by Sabre on Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby heimdall » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:40 pm

Sabre wrote:On the question whether under more favourable signing conditions Rafa would be the proper man, the answer is, yes, obviously (obvious for me, that is).

With Torres the club beat a record in spending, meaning that previous to that signing Rafa wasn't having the spending power to bring a Torres or a Villa. Even when he had, he had to pick the unsafe (cheaper) option, as you can't forget that Torres has world class reputation after coming to liverpool, not before.

Having more spending power and less restraints would make his manager side of his job easier, he would make quicker deals, he wouldn't have to have signed patches like he used to in the first years, and he'd have to do less "gambles".

Yes, because when you sign a Robben or a Ronaldo that's not a gamble, they're well known. When you sign a player like Riera from a mid tim, you are gambling. Sometimes the gambles will go well, and sometimes not (ministry of sound players). The more money you have, the less gambles you'll make, the easier will be that part of your job.

So yes, in case the Kuwaities come, I still think Rafa would be the best option. I trust the man in the tactics part and as a coach, and having less restraints would only make his job easier.

Might have guessed you would be one of the idiots who support Lando!! I actually thought you were ok'ish but now :no

Rafa can do no wrong in your eyes can he? It's never ever his fault is it!

I'm actually all for sacking Rafa anyway at the end of the season, unless my some frigging miracle he manages to pull his finger out of :censored: and actually start managing instead of bitching to the media every 5 minutes, but if we get a wad of cash then he is absolutely not the right manager, he can't man manage his current players how the hell would he cope with a squad of big egos, it would be a frigging disaster and in any case he'd probably still sign the wrong players or build up our squad to about 200 average players!
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby GYBS » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:40 pm

The question is would Mourinho come to the club without the money there for him ?? i very much doubt it .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby GYBS » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:42 pm

heimdall wrote:
Sabre wrote:On the question whether under more favourable signing conditions Rafa would be the proper man, the answer is, yes, obviously (obvious for me, that is).

With Torres the club beat a record in spending, meaning that previous to that signing Rafa wasn't having the spending power to bring a Torres or a Villa. Even when he had, he had to pick the unsafe (cheaper) option, as you can't forget that Torres has world class reputation after coming to liverpool, not before.

Having more spending power and less restraints would make his manager side of his job easier, he would make quicker deals, he wouldn't have to have signed patches like he used to in the first years, and he'd have to do less "gambles".

Yes, because when you sign a Robben or a Ronaldo that's not a gamble, they're well known. When you sign a player like Riera from a mid tim, you are gambling. Sometimes the gambles will go well, and sometimes not (ministry of sound players). The more money you have, the less gambles you'll make, the easier will be that part of your job.

So yes, in case the Kuwaities come, I still think Rafa would be the best option. I trust the man in the tactics part and as a coach, and having less restraints would only make his job easier.

Might have guessed you would be one of the idiots who support Lando!! I actually thought you were ok'ish but now :no

Rafa can do no wrong in your eyes can he? It's never ever his fault, after all he 's spanish.

I'm actually all for sacking Rafa anyway at the end of the season, unless my some frigging miracle he manages to pull his finger out of :censored: and actually start managing instead of bitching to the media every 5 minutes, but if we get a wad of cash then he is absolutely not the right manager, he can't man manage his current players how the hell would he cope with a squad of big egos, it would be a frigging disaster and in any case he'd probably still sign the wrong players or build up our squad to about 200 average players!

how do you know he cant manage his current players ?

So you sack rafa so tell me who realistically you would replace him with ?

and also maybe i would suggest not insulting people every time you post something .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby heimdall » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:43 pm

GYBS wrote:The question is would Mourinho come to the club without the money there for him ?? i very much doubt it .

Ermm I think the clue is in the thread title, who would you want to manage IF the Kuwaities buy the club!  :rasp
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby heimdall » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:47 pm

GYBS wrote:
heimdall wrote:
Sabre wrote:On the question whether under more favourable signing conditions Rafa would be the proper man, the answer is, yes, obviously (obvious for me, that is).

With Torres the club beat a record in spending, meaning that previous to that signing Rafa wasn't having the spending power to bring a Torres or a Villa. Even when he had, he had to pick the unsafe (cheaper) option, as you can't forget that Torres has world class reputation after coming to liverpool, not before.

Having more spending power and less restraints would make his manager side of his job easier, he would make quicker deals, he wouldn't have to have signed patches like he used to in the first years, and he'd have to do less "gambles".

Yes, because when you sign a Robben or a Ronaldo that's not a gamble, they're well known. When you sign a player like Riera from a mid tim, you are gambling. Sometimes the gambles will go well, and sometimes not (ministry of sound players). The more money you have, the less gambles you'll make, the easier will be that part of your job.

So yes, in case the Kuwaities come, I still think Rafa would be the best option. I trust the man in the tactics part and as a coach, and having less restraints would only make his job easier.

Might have guessed you would be one of the idiots who support Lando!! I actually thought you were ok'ish but now :no

Rafa can do no wrong in your eyes can he? It's never ever his fault, after all he 's spanish.

I'm actually all for sacking Rafa anyway at the end of the season, unless my some frigging miracle he manages to pull his finger out of :censored: and actually start managing instead of bitching to the media every 5 minutes, but if we get a wad of cash then he is absolutely not the right manager, he can't man manage his current players how the hell would he cope with a squad of big egos, it would be a frigging disaster and in any case he'd probably still sign the wrong players or build up our squad to about 200 average players!

how do you know he cant manage his current players ?

So you sack rafa so tell me who realistically you would replace him with ?

and also maybe i would suggest not insulting people every time you post something .

So I always insult people do I, what more than Lando the foul mouthed vulgar protected member of this forum, in any case i have not insulted you recently have I, in fact I applauded you for your humanitarian work, I genuinly mean that by the way, we are like chalk and cheese when it comes to LFC but I do have a lot of respect for you for that. :bowdown

BTW Maureen and Hiddink would be my preferred choices to succeed Rafa, which I think I have now told you 20 times, who I think will definitely be off in the summer anyway.
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby GYBS » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:48 pm

heimdall wrote:
GYBS wrote:The question is would Mourinho come to the club without the money there for him ?? i very much doubt it .

Ermm I think the clue is in the thread title, who would you want to manage IF the Kuwaities buy the club!  :rasp

i asked a question - i can read the title thank you . ie my point is maureen follows the money so is he actually a decent manager ?
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

Postby heimdall » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:53 pm

GYBS wrote:
heimdall wrote:
GYBS wrote:The question is would Mourinho come to the club without the money there for him ?? i very much doubt it .

Ermm I think the clue is in the thread title, who would you want to manage IF the Kuwaities buy the club!  :rasp

i asked a question - i can read the title thank you . ie my point is maureen follows the money so is he actually a decent manager ?

Stop backtracking  :D that is not what you meant and you know it. I do take it you're English right, so your command of the language is up to scratch.

I had no idea that Inter were so cash rich, or Porto for that matter!
User avatar
heimdall
 
Posts: 4971
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Location: London

Postby GYBS » Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:54 pm

heimdall wrote:
GYBS wrote:
heimdall wrote:
GYBS wrote:The question is would Mourinho come to the club without the money there for him ?? i very much doubt it .

Ermm I think the clue is in the thread title, who would you want to manage IF the Kuwaities buy the club!  :rasp

i asked a question - i can read the title thank you . ie my point is maureen follows the money so is he actually a decent manager ?

Stop backtracking  :D that is not what you meant and you know it. I do take it you're English right, so your command of the language is up to scratch.

I had no idea that Inter were so cash rich, or Porto for that matter!

who is back tracking ? certainly not me - trying to explain the question to someone who obviously doesnt have a clue - and yes both porto and inter are very rich indeed . especailly inter .
Image
User avatar
GYBS
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8647
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: Oxford

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 66 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e