The champions league - How hard is it?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby JoeTerp » Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:53 pm

Sabre wrote:I don't find your view radical, in fact that's a possibility that's been discussed hundred of times in my country.

The problem I see is that reducing the league to 18 teams, only means 4 matches less in the local competition. Not enough to get the necessary matches to do a proper European league. And if you talk about reducing further than 18 teams, you'd find a massive opposition in the local federations, at least the Spanish ones.

The agenda, with the international games, is crowded enough. It's difficult to set a proper league without weakening competitions that have more than 100 years of history.

But despite I think it's difficult, I'm afraid that may be the future if the course of football continues this way. :(

I think the only other way to "take games out" of the domestic schedule would be to limit countries to one cup competition that has only one leg per round.  And a truly proper European League does not seem possible without putting too much of a strain on the players, but to make it to the final while playing in the 3rd qualifying round you would have to play 15 games, 19 if you started in the first round of qualifying, while a 10 team league would only play 18 games.
Image
User avatar
JoeTerp
 
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:38 am
Location: Boston, MA

Postby stmichael » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:24 pm

The group format is a waste of time imo. We've got a situation where tonights games have NOTHING ON THEM. The two teams have qualified from every group and all that needs to be sorted out is who finishes first and second.

The draw for the next round will be interesting though. With teams like Roma and Panathanaikos winning their groups, there's a big possibility that our reward for winning our group could be a tie against Inter or Real Madrid. On the other hand, Chelsea could get Barcelona, Juventus, Lyon or Bayern but will probably end up getting Panathanaikos.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby JamCar05 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:22 pm

stmichael wrote:Chelsea could get Barcelona, Juventus, Lyon or Bayern but will probably end up getting Panathanaikos.

I think that one is a given - the lucky gits :angry:

In general it seems a bit as if there isn't a GREAT difference whether you end up first or second in your group this year imo (except for the fact that you get to play the second tie at home of course). Will indeed be interesting how the draw pans out, though I actually feel we've got an excellent chance to go through no matter who we get out of the teams possible to us.
User avatar
JamCar05
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:22 pm

Postby stmichael » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:30 pm

I think I'll watch the Bayern-Lyon game tonight. That is by far the best game on show.

I can see Arsenal getting beat and finishing second in their group. Then they'll probably draw Barcelona and the press will w@nk themselves silly over the prospect of the most beautiful tie in the history of football. :sleep
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby Bad Bob » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:38 am

Right, so let's see who we can be drawn against now that the dust's all settled.  I'm assuming we can't draw Atletico Madrid again at this stage.  And we can't get any other group winners or any of the English clubs, which leaves:

Inter
Sporting Lisbon
Villareal
Lyon
Real Madrid

Sporting would seem to be the weakest of that lot, which means we won't get them.  I expect it'll be Inter or Real, with Villareal as the dark horse.  Somehow, I just don't see us drawing Lyon for some reason.  It shall be interesting to see who comes out of the pot next Friday. :nod
Image
User avatar
Bad Bob
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 11269
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:03 pm
Location: Canada

Postby huang xiangwen » Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:45 am

we will hold up the trophy at ROMA
一日红军人,一生红军魂!
huang xiangwen
 
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:27 am
Location: china

Postby Ciggy » Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:51 am

Arsenal where cr@p last night against a team that plays football on the floor they totally out played them, not the likes of Stoke or Bolton who rough them up.
So what excuse are they going to use now? And how bad is that Almunia  ???
There is no-one anywhere in the world at any stage who is any bigger or any better than this football club.

Kenny Dalglish 1/2/2011

REST IN PEACE PHIL, YOU WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN.
User avatar
Ciggy
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 26826
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:36 pm

Postby Fowler_E7 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Bad Bob wrote:Right, so let's see who we can be drawn against now that the dust's all settled.  I'm assuming we can't draw Atletico Madrid again at this stage.  And we can't get any other group winners or any of the English clubs, which leaves:

Inter
Sporting Lisbon
Villareal
Lyon
Real Madrid

Sporting would seem to be the weakest of that lot, which means we won't get them.  I expect it'll be Inter or Real, with Villareal as the dark horse.  Somehow, I just don't see us drawing Lyon for some reason.  It shall be interesting to see who comes out of the pot next Friday. :nod

we can beat any of them, but i dont particuarly want Inter or Villareal,. Inter coz i hate playing against teams we beat the year before (wounded animal and all that) and Villareal are a good side, who could get a goal at Anfield, but i would still be confident regardless of who we get.
User avatar
Fowler_E7
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2790
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 9:24 pm

Postby JamCar05 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:16 pm

Bad Bob wrote:Right, so let's see who we can be drawn against now that the dust's all settled.  I'm assuming we can't draw Atletico Madrid again at this stage.  And we can't get any other group winners or any of the English clubs, which leaves:

Inter
Sporting Lisbon
Villareal
Lyon
Real Madrid

Sporting would seem to be the weakest of that lot, which means we won't get them.  I expect it'll be Inter or Real, with Villareal as the dark horse.  Somehow, I just don't see us drawing Lyon for some reason.  It shall be interesting to see who comes out of the pot next Friday. :nod

I have a sneaky feeling we'll get Inter again. We often seem to draw the same teams (like Chelsea, PSV and Marseille in recent years), and for this reason I would like to avoid them and play someone else, so hopefully my gut feeling is wrong!

Would also like to avoid Villarreal though, as I actually think they're quite strong (I'm not giving too much thought to their defeat against Celtic yesterday, as they were already through).

On the other hand it would be very interesting to play Real Madrid me thinks (and I think we would stand an excellent chance, although I realise things might look different for them come February).

Sporting would obviously be the easiest draw on paper, but then again so was Benfica in 2006.

Lyon? They're a bit difficult to judge tbh, as they sometimes turn in a magnificent performance, whereas at other times they do look rather average imo.

All in all I would prefer Real Madrid or Sporting (then Lyon). Which leads me to conclude that we'll get... Inter :D
User avatar
JamCar05
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 10:22 pm

Postby ConnO'var » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:37 pm

bigmick wrote:The reason I mentioned it at the time of course was not because I particularly give a feck about UEFA or Platini, but because I was making the point that just because you did well in Europe, it doesn't make your manager a God if he manages one of the big four in England. To be justifiably revered, you have to do well against your peers IMHO, in the Premiership.

It's an interesting post Mick. Curiously this phenomenon (good cup sides but less successful league sides) also occured during a period in the early 80's where we saw something similar happen to another club who was not only doing fantastically well in Europe (all things considered) but also in the domestic Cup competitions as well.... which mirrors what we were doing in the previous 5 years barring one under Rafa.

I speak of Spurs in their heyday when they were pushing for honours in Europe and doing brilliantly in the domestic competitions.

From 1980-1984, they were simply outstanding in the cup competitions both in Europe and domestically.

FA cup winners in '81 and '82.
League Cup runners-up in '82.
Charity Shield winners in '82 and Runner's-up in'83
UEFA Cup Winner's Cup Semi-finalists in '82
UEFA Cup winners in '84.

They were however struggling in the league in that period coming in 10th, 4th, 4th and 8th respectively from '81-'84.

Our record, under Rafa, while undeniably better, bears an uncanny resemblance during the Spaniard's 1st 4 seasons in charge.

European Cup winners in '05, Runner's up in '07 and semifinalists in '08.
FA Cup winners in '06
League Cup Runner's up in '05
UEFA Super Cup winners in '06
Charity Shield winners in '07

During this period we came in 5th, 3rd, 3rd and 4th.

Like us, they had an iconic and arguably the best midfielder in England at the time in Glenn Hoddle while we have the, imo, incomparable Steven Gerrard.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that for a team to be successful in the league as compared to just the cups require different philosophies and approaches.

With Spurs during that period, their strengths were the exact mirror opposites to our own strenghts under Rafa. They were a fantastically gifted team in attack but woeful in defence which is 180 degrees apart from our own strengths.

In the league
To get a result against spurs in those days most teams would play them on the counter attack. With their porous defence, it didn't make sense for teams to take a "park the bus" approach. As such, they struggled in the league against physical opposition who would press them no end in the hope of getting a draw and even a win.

For us, under Rafa, I feel that our strengths were mostly defensive. So the weaker teams would do something similar (but not exactly the same) as they probably knew that they could get a result against us as long as they didn't over commit their players. Hence the multitude of draws.

In Cup Competitions

Its an entirely different kettle of fish as you simply cannot play for a draw as it buys you nothing..... you have to play for the win eventually and this opens up spaces to allow both teams to play their natural games. Hence why both teams do well in cups and not as well in the league.

I've not been following our games recently due to other commitments but over the last couple of days I've read, with great interest, some of the match threads of late so the only thing I've got to see how we've been doing is the posts from all on here. When I've got a bit more time, I'll try to watch the past few games on the net. Maybe then I'll have more of an opinion on how we've been doing.

But I've got to say, it feels absolutely fabulous being in the current position we are in at the moment.

:buttrock  :D
Image
Image
User avatar
ConnO'var
 
Posts: 3643
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:30 pm

Postby fivecups » Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:31 pm

Probably not the right thread, but I wondered if anyone else watched the Real Madrid match today.

They've a lot of top quality individuals but don't seem to play as a cohesive unit. Argen Robben was superb and appears to be their danger man. They look like a team whose just got a new manager.

With home advantage in the second leg I'm confident that we can beat them and progress to the next round.

I wish we had been able to sign Heinze though.
User avatar
fivecups
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4264
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Belfast

Previous

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 78 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e