Liverpool FC Forum

NANNY RED wrote:Time to apoligise 

If i offended anyone on here last night im sorry i cant even bring meself to read the thread in case i was totaly bang out of order , id had a good bevi and i know its no excuse but i cant even remember what i posted

So sorry

You didn't say much wrong Nanny don't worry about it.

I take it me, Bam, Bigmick and Badbob are no longer on a promise though ?   

NANNY RED wrote:Time to apoligise 

If i offended anyone on here last night im sorry i cant even bring meself to read the thread in case i was totaly bang out of order , id had a good bevi and i know its no excuse but i cant even remember what i posted

So sorry

Nan, you might want to delete that photo you posted of yourself nekid.   

Reg wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:Time to apoligise 

If i offended anyone on here last night im sorry i cant even bring meself to read the thread in case i was totaly bang out of order , id had a good bevi and i know its no excuse but i cant even remember what i posted

So sorry

Nan, you might want to delete that photo you posted of yourself nekid.   

maypaxvobiscum wrote:

s@int wrote:

NANNY RED wrote:For crying out loud we got a well derseved point in a game once again we totaly dominated ,an should of won but yet once again the sniping starts.   

We played well ffs

Spot on Nanny 

wait....so we TOTALY dominated a game and got a well deserved POINT. not 3 but just 1. and thats good enough for you?

tonyeh wrote:

Scottbot wrote:

puroresu wrote:

Scottbot wrote:

puroresu wrote:4-3-2-1 cannot be played without torres.  we have no other strikers with the ability to play in this system.

So we shouldn't have played that line-up away to Chelsea?

Well it wasnt as if keane was very effective in that game either was it.  I wouldnt say he was pivotal to the result we got at chelsea at all.  Babel was better in the short time he played.

But you still maintain that we C'ANT play 4-2-3-1 without Torres DESPITE the FACT we were the first team to win at Chelsea in nearly FIVE years. I deffo think we should play a different system there next season

But, on evidence, Liverpool can't (and shouldn't most of the time) play 4-2-3-1 against most sides. Using that formation against Chelsea was the right idea. But it was a defensive mindset and the team spent most of the game defending with two layers of four. Rafa set out for the draw before that game started.

LIVERPOOL WERE LUCKY (THAT'S LUCKY) TO GET A DEFLECTION GOAL AGAINST CHELSEA USING THAT FORMATION.

Other than that LUCKY deflection goal, there wasn't much chance of Liverpool scoring in that game.

Yes Liverpool had a good game against Chelsea in other areas of the park, but at the business end they were no great shakes.

Against other teams, Liverpool should play with two up front and at least offer the midfield more options going forward. At the very least two strikers will force oposition teams to divide their defence.

Rafa is deluding himself and the fans if he thinks that the likes of Keane, Kuyt, N'gog or Babel are consistantly good enough to play on their own up front.

s@int wrote:I think people are getting a bit carried away with 4-4-2 being the answer to all our prayers. Without Torres I don't think it would matter if we played 4-4-2  or 4-1-5 we would still struggle for goals BECAUSE THE OTHER FORWARDS ARN'T SCORING ENOUGH. Only Kuyt has been carrying the burden this season, and the last thing we need is him playing furthest striker forward..... because he doesn't lead the line, he drops off .

I prefer 4-4-2 and think against MOST sides its probably the best formation IF we have two strikers playing well and scoring, at the moment with Keane firing blanks I would prefer Gerrard behind Torres. I think we have a lack of options up front at the moment with Torres being out, and tbh very LUCKY to have scored as many goals as we have this season, even with the large number of chances we have made.

We need another striker ..... and one that we can rely on to get goals even when Torres is out. Even if Keane starts knocking goals in for fun when Torres comes back we still need another striker, because we have no one to lead the line when Torres doesn't play, and as we all know Torres can't play EVERY GAME can he?

W

tonyeh wrote:

Lando_Griffin wrote:I can't help but think that Torres would have had about 4 goals tonight, had he played. The only thing we were missing was movement in the box and a finishing touch.

To say it was a poor performance not only detracts from the lads, but also from a very accomplished Athletico side IMHO.

Ah, that's nonsense Lando.   

It wasn't the lack of "movement in the box" or a "finishing touch" that allowed AM to go 1 up. It was the extremely poor passing and the utter lack of ability to keep the ball that gave the Spanish the edge over Liverpool.

Liverpool's lack of finishing is very worrying, but as long as Liverpool KEEP handing the ball over to the opposition, they will continually lose the initiative in games and that should have red lights go off everywhere for the team.

Saying it was a poor performance is an HONEST evaluation of Liverpool's game last night. Saying it was anything other than that is blind. partisan rubbish of the lowest order.

Sorry boss.

Guess that's me all told off and put in my place... 

Grow up.

ACP-ATM wrote:Congratulations!

Your captain holds the flagship of the fairplay as no one....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v....rl=http