by Sabre » Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:29 pm
Some people get this debates personal as if it was a problem to give credit to Bigmick, Toffeehater, Lando or whoever.
I have lorries and lorries of credit to give to Bigmick. He knows I respect his views since 2004.
Regarding rotation I will give him credit when I'm sure of it.
Now it seems obvious to me that Rafa changed the policy, and I admit him that. Late? Yes, he spotted it before I did. I just say "you were right" when I'm honestly sure about it.
And about rotation being a key factor (note that I say "key" as in "main", not saying it doesn't have an impact at all), I'll give him credit when I'm sure of it, not before, because otherwise I'd be lying. I'm missing the obvious? may be. Am I sincere? totally.
Do I think rotating less has good consequences? Yes
Why I am not a antirotationist? Because I also think it has bad sides. To mention:
* If you play a player like Mascherano rarely, you might have him unhappy at some point, and in big clubs you have to have deep squads.
* Alonso has played all minutes bar 52 in the league. If he also plays the CL, I'm sure that in December he won't be as good as he's now.
If you read Tomkins, he mentions rotation and he also doubts about it being a key factor, he says you cannot prove it's the key factor when there are other factors involved. And I don't think Tomkins has problems to give credit to bigmick, he's just writing his thoughts. Ridiculous for many? Possibly, but his thoughts.
It's not a problem of who's right or wrong in my case, I'm happy to agree Bigmick when I sincerely agree! I like him as a poster!
And it's not a problem of admitting to be wrong neither! I was bloody wrong with Torres' adaptation and Gonzalez impact!
--------
In a nutshell:
Do I see benefits of insisting with the same block? Yes.
Do I have doubts we will pay a price for it in some months? yes, I have doubts, and I'll be very happy if I'm wrong.
Do I think in the second season of Rafa we weren't challenging because of rotation? No. I think back then the squad was worse than it is now. We didn't have Mascherano or Torres, which are key.
What's more key to our current success, lack of rotation or that we have been building a squad progressively? I couldn't tell what % to give to each factor, plus other factors like Alonso or Agger not being injured or recovering from it. If someone knows to tell what's the main factor, fair play to him, I can't.
Last edited by
Sabre on Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SOS member #1499
Drummerphil, never forgotten.