maguskwt wrote:precisely... let's take an example here... as far as I know most of the Defenders of Kuyt (including me) are not supporting him blindly... they defend him because 90% of criticism he's receiving ARE NOT sensible and sometimes to the extent of being unclassy. such as the 'he's more useful injured' or 'he's more useful dead than injured' or those who reject his goal because it went off his knee or shin or whatever. And that's when the questioning of whether one is a real supporter of the club starts thrown at. If the criticism becomes too unclassy to the extent that you wish your OWN club to be thrashed by another team just to prove the point then the response is called for imo. In fact, if you look at the dirk kuyt thread ppl who're defending him ARE the ones who are explaining in length in a SENSIBLE manner not the ones who're criticising him. So, they are called 'happy clappy' for that and all the personal insults starts. In fact it is of my opnion that most of the people who are defending anyone ARE the ones explaining their support more sensibly than those who are criticising easily at the players and the manager. Of course sometimes there are these fanboys who even after a lengthy post to give reason/explain a criticism of a player, they would attempt to get under the skin of a criticiser. But to think that it is mainly the happer clappers who get under the skin of the criticiser is obviously biased.
PS. and yes like LFC put it the senseless criticisms are just too regular, too easy, and the same old thing most of the time.
Well said