Bad Bob wrote:lakes10 wrote:you need to draw them out then hit them.
Rafa dont do that.
How's that accomplished then, mate?
maypaxvobiscum wrote:Lakes and BadBob have points.
1) rafa couldve adjusted his plans and given out instructions as we became more desperate
2) the players could have taken their chances better
its was a collective team effort that caused such a result. i dont see how anyone could be pinpointed for any specific blame.
lakes10 wrote:Bad Bob wrote:lakes10 wrote:you need to draw them out then hit them.
Rafa dont do that.
How's that accomplished then, mate?
same way as Man u and and the other culbs do it mate, let them over commit themselves, you know your are better than them, so you just sit back for a bit, they start to think they can come at us then you you hit them. its the olsd 1980 type football. it has not changed and we was good at it once. or you keep the ball go wide taking their players with you then cross it. not run at 11 men in a box with a ball.
Bad Bob wrote:aCe' wrote:our players better than theirs... need motivation..tactics.. good subs... you win the game... players fail to perform..take them off.. thats what ur paid to do as manager... we cant go around blaming the players whenever we dont perform but when we do get results the manager takes credit as well ?!
I didn't see a lack of motivation out there yesterday. I saw a team that individually and collectively turned in a performance below what they were capable of. I saw tactics that created chances, only to see those chances spurned. I saw positive subs designed to bring on players who could change the game. Above all else, I saw a game where we would otherwise win at a canter turn out a disappointing draw because our top players simply failed to do what we've come to routinely expect them to do.
For those that saw things differently, I'd like to know just what changes you would have made in Rafa's place to bring about the victory? What glaring mistakes did he make that you would have sidestepped if you were calling the shots? Because I don't see it.
Bad Bob wrote:lakes10 wrote:Bad Bob wrote:lakes10 wrote:you need to draw them out then hit them.
Rafa dont do that.
How's that accomplished then, mate?
same way as Man u and and the other culbs do it mate, let them over commit themselves, you know your are better than them, so you just sit back for a bit, they start to think they can come at us then you you hit them. its the olsd 1980 type football. it has not changed and we was good at it once. or you keep the ball go wide taking their players with you then cross it. not run at 11 men in a box with a ball.
I'm not sure about drawing them out, mate. I've never seen a team put so many men behind the ball and sit so deep as they did. A complete lack of adventure on their part and it makes me wonder if they could have been drawn out. I agree about changing the point of attack to wide positions and I thought we did that reasonably effectively when Riera was on the pitch. The problem, as Andy's already mentioned, is that we showed a very lop-sided threat down the left yesterday and Stoke were able to overload that side of the pitch.
Just as much of a problem, IMO, is our fullbacks. Yesterday we needed the fullbacks trying to overlap our wide midfielders and get crosses in from deep positions. The trouble is that neither Dossena or Arbeloa carry a significant threat with their crossing and both seem to resist the urge to drive completely to the byline before crossing anyway, looking often to check back onto their other foot and play a safe ball back to the winger. When they did put crosses in, as Barry's noted, they were often from deep positions and they were looped in rather than whipped in. Perhaps, tactically, Rafa should have urged them to drive to the byline more but I wonder if it's just a case of neither being good enough.
That said, I still contend we created enough chances to win and didn't take them.
Sabre wrote:Bad Bob wrote:aCe' wrote:anyways its 2 points lost and with the difference in quality between our players and theirs... cant help but think that the manager has to take most of the blame...
Ah, see that's where I fundamentally disagree with you Ace'. With the difference in quality between our players and theirs I can't help but think that the players have to take most of the blame. Did they execute on the day? No they did not and that's the bottom line for me.
Now it seems our players are not intelligent enough.As if not winning yesterday depended on sheer footballing intelligence.
Perhaps "We've got the best midfield of the world" was a bit too much, but the reality is closer to that than to "Our players lack intelligence".
Yesterdays' game didn't require Barcelona-esque passing, nor our best football. It didn't even require a top class team like Liverpool to beat Stoke, you could expect a win even from Villa, Tottenham and many teams with midfielders much worse than ours.
We simply didn't score our chances. Our plan of the game wasn't bad, we did try to use width which is the proper thing to do in these games, we just didn't deliver upfront. In other games other seasons we did fail to build up and create chances, it was a more dull dominance, but yesterday we didn't score, and what it could have been massive euphoria it has become in the usual stuff around here.
League is long, and we shouldn't change our mood from one week to another.
As for the initial questions, is this a blip or a bliiiip, I'm not a fortune teller, but I do think we have won width with Riera and we are able to compete with the other top teams.
In Bigmicks' book probably it was time to give time to the Mascherano-Alonso pairing that worked against Manchester United, but for me it made sense the Gerrard-Alonso selection. Why? it was a game to use width and range shots, and in the team selection Gerrard-Alonso are more appropiate for that kind of game, there was not much to be destroyed Mascherano, so that team selection made sense, and rest Mascherano for the next game. It didn't work, our corners were shíte, and we were dull upfront, but from one game my confidence hasn't crumbled.
bigmick wrote:Well I'm still hopeful and I haven't slagged anybody off this season. I do hope though that as the whole thing pans out and we go forwards we are not going to once again get into this ridiculous argument about whether or not it's Rafa's fault should we underperform. If we don't beat Stoke at Home, then I don't give two sh!tes whether we were unlucky, had three penalties saved, hit the post four times and got robbed by the ref, it isn't a good day at the office for the manager. Similarly, if we go very close to winning the Premiership, it would be absolutely ridiculous to say it was nothing to do with the manager, the players got us all those points.
It's not by any means the end of the World that we didn't beat Stoke, nor is the end that we haven't really started the season with any fluency. But Rafa is culpable in everything which happens on the pitch, just as it is to his credit that we beat Man Utd etc etc. This "it's not Rafa's fault that Torres missed a free header" is a silly argument. We can then assume that Rafa deserves no credit for any of the goals we score, for any of the goals we avoid conceding?
No. We win together and we lose together. In this case we drew together and wasted an excellent opportunity to gain two points on Manchester United and Chelsea. Two points which would never be given back, simply a "given" two point cushion. It was a wasted opportunity, and if there is blame to be assigned everyone takes it INCLUDING the manager. It is over now though, and we must bounce back before it becomes a bliiiiiiiiip.
Perhaps if some people on here had a little more intelligence they would realise that the problem wasn't just Saturdays game, but has been apparent both this season , last season and for quite a number of years now.
Started getting the picture now, or do you need it explaining further ?
We have great strikers , a great player in Gerrard WHAT WE DON'T HAVE is someone with game intelligence. That doesn't mean our players are thick or cr@p, it means we don't have a player that is good enough in that particular aspect of the game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests