Leonmc0708 wrote:Pennant is SHI.TE - FACT
worse than kuyt? i dont think so mate. Pennants no world beater , but he can do a decent job and at leasts provide width and give the strikers something to work with Kuyt does neither
Leonmc0708 wrote:Pennant is SHI.TE - FACT
Leonmc0708 wrote:Pennant is SHI.TE - FACT
Leonmc0708 wrote:PEnant has scored two goals in al lthe time he has been here from right wing, Kuyt has around 15.
Penant has managed 8 assists since he has been here Kuyt is on around 28.
Just because one is a winger and one was a stiker means fuc.k all.
Ray Kennedy was one of our greatest left midfielders and started life up front.
*Disclaimer - I am not comparing Ray to Dirk, just highlighting the short sightedness of the agument. I am also cr.ap at moderating and my posts are all garbage so you may as well take no notice of me.
Leonmc0708 wrote:PEnant has scored two goals in al lthe time he has been here from right wing, Kuyt has around 15.
Penant has managed 8 assists since he has been here Kuyt is on around 28.
Just because one is a winger and one was a stiker means fuc.k all.
Ray Kennedy was one of our greatest left midfielders and started life up front.
*Disclaimer - I am not comparing Ray to Dirk, just highlighting the short sightedness of the agument. I am also cr.ap at moderating and my posts are all garbage so you may as well take no notice of me.
Leonmc0708 wrote:PEnant has scored two goals in al lthe time he has been here from right wing, Kuyt has around 15.
Penant has managed 8 assists since he has been here Kuyt is on around 28.
Just because one is a winger and one was a stiker means fuc.k all.
Owzat wrote:Leonmc0708 wrote:PEnant has scored two goals in al lthe time he has been here from right wing, Kuyt has around 15.
Penant has managed 8 assists since he has been here Kuyt is on around 28.
Just because one is a winger and one was a stiker means fuc.k all.
Pennant is a good winger IN THEORY, the problem is all the things he CAN (allegedly) do he doesn't.
Not sure Kuyt has 15 goals from the wing, his current scoring rate is around 1 every 3 or 4 games so he'd have to have played around 60 games. But Pennant has so few goals, one of which was a fluke, and his return of assists was equally dire. It's no good being quick, supposedly able to beat defenders and be able to cross or shoot, the returns are what count, the end product. Pennant doesn't have one, Kuyt perhaps works too hard and that can negate the effectiveness of him playing on the right.
Once his role changed against Liege he was getting in good shooting positions and scored. In one short period in the match he was on the right passing the ball out of play (because El Zhar was not on the wing, did he get stick for that? NO), not long after he was in front of the back four tackling and then not long after that he was to the left of centre. If Rafa wants to play him on the right, maybe it would help if he was given a more narrow and defined role and made to stick to the wing. It's great he works back, but you can't maintain shape if your man on the right isn't on the right most of the time.
stmichael wrote:playing for the reserves tonight so will be interesting to see how he gets on.
GRAHAM01 wrote:well owzat i just looked it up he did play on the 17th but if you read below he didn't do that much, they lost 2-1 and didn't show much attacking play but to be fair that was there first loss in almost a year
i think it was because he was playing![]()
![]()
Having included the likes of David Ngog and Jermaine Pennant in his starting XI, Ablett will have been disappointed with the first 45 and his side's lack of attacking verve, particularly as the visitors' didn't have a chance of note until the dying embers of the half when a Damien Plessis drive and a Daniel Pacheco free-kick finally forced Nick Colgan into action.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 55 guests