puroresu wrote:Rush Job wrote:puroresu wrote:hello_red wrote:Owzat chill out, Lad is a commonly used term from our neck of the woods so calm down sunshine.
And about the Barry transfer, lets get it done I say. Know one else I reckon would fit into our system. Van Der Varrt is most likely going to Madrid, Silva is small and will take time to settle and I dont want Downing.
He is also proven prem quality much like Keane, better to buy these types of player than some no mark from France etc etc.
Gareth Barry is not worth 20 mil and another english player who is way overrated who probably no-on on the continent has ever heard of him and wonder why LFC are ready to pay £20 mil for an English no mark.
I wonder if the mancs are moaning about the money they shelled out on Carrick or Hargreves? oh no thats right they won the league.
difference is they have the luxuary to go and spend that kind of money on that type of player. We do not. We have to scramble to try and raise the money. If thats all we got I would like to a better quality of player than Barry brought in. Barry isnt even better than Alonso.
£20m for a 28 year old striker and then £20m for an over-rated 27.5 year old midfielder.
General rule of thumb, fees are about 50% more than a player is worth these days. Not always true, but seems to fit in nicely with a fair few
£16.5m Bent/Modric (£11m + 50%)
£20.3m Keane (£13.5m + 50%)
£18m Barny (£12m + 50%)
£30m Ferdinand (£20m + 50%)
£17m Hargreaves (£11.3m + 50%)
£11m Crouch (£7.3m + 50%)
£15m Bentley (£10m + 50%)
£6.7m Pennant (£4.5m + 50%)
And Barny is not clearly better than Alonso, plus the Spaniard is nine months younger. I reckon he'll have a better season this time around with a run in the side, not convinced Barny will make a smidgeon of difference. I'd risk paying £16.5m for Modric or £15m for Bentley, or a striker like Santa Cruz. I wonder what Santa Cruz would have cost, what with being nearly a year younger than Keane. Citeh may answer that question, it's rumoured they're after him