Liverpool FC Forum

metalhead wrote:and good luck to him, scored some important goals in his liverpool career.

Scottbot wrote:Redknapp thinks anymore than 9mill is silly money? Well hold on a minute mate, you sold the guy for 7 million 3 years ago. Since that time he's become an England regular, scored goals in the Champions League, scored goals and been successful for a top side and he's only 2 million better? I reckon we can and should get another 1-2 mill for the lad.

mr_weed_80@hotmail.com wrote:anywho, i reckon crouch for £10 is a great deal, simply because he has not featured in our plans on a regular basis. but crouchy will always be remembered to me as robokop wooo

10 quid lol sounds about right 

hold out for 10mil off pompey i say, am i nuts for wanting crouchy to stay though? 

Bamaga man wrote:

He's an England SQUAD regular, not starting he isn't. As for scoring goals, well for England it was against predominantly sh1 te sides and for Liverpool ditto

Get over it.

He can only score against the sides he's put up against ! 

Liverpool 2005/6-2007/8 : P179 W105 D38 L38
Without Crouch's goals : P179 W95 D42 L42

Those stats can be very misleading, unless of course you give us every team player in every single match. I.e was it a second string side, was he paired with Voronin upfront. Did Gerrard play or not, did Carra play or not, etc.

Pull up those stats if to be fair to him, you always throw stats in your posts and they can be so often misleading, to your view. Take for example you slate Crouch, pull up some misleading stats to back your opinion up. Where I simply watch the game itself, watch the palyer himself, afterall football is played on grass not paper.

Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal - still is pretty ordinary at 6 goals in 26 appearances, half of those his hat-trick against Arsenal when their defence was asleep.

The whole team even Rafas records against the other big three is dismal, kin ell. Then you have the audacity to say his Hatrick wasnt because of his ability and eye for a goal. But because the arsenal defence was asleep   I'd expect to here that sort of $hit from a gooner, not a Liverpool supporter, Jesus.

Redman in wales wrote:Pompey's £9m Crouch bid rejected 

Liverpool have rejected a bid for striker Peter Crouch from Portsmouth, BBC Radio Merseyside understands.

Neither club are prepared to comment on the reports but the offer is believed to have been in the region of £9m.

The 27-year-old played under Pompey boss Harry Redknapp at Southampton before he moved to Merseyside for £7m in the summer of 2005.

Liverpool boss Rafael Benitez has hinted he would consider offers for Crouch in the region of £15m.

"I'd love to bring Crouchie back here," Redknapp told Portsmouth News.

"We are trying to do deals to bring in players and chief executive Peter Storrie is working on trying to get things done.

"But the fee seems a bit too high, and at the end of the day it comes down to the price."

The England international has scored 40 goals in 135 appearances for the Anfield side but has struggled to hold down a regular first-team place last season.

Crouch was relegated behind Fernando Torres, who scored 33 goals for the Reds after signing from Atletico Madrid last summer.

But Crouch, who has a year left on his current deal with the Anfield club, still managed to net 11 goals as he was mainly used as a substitute by Benitez.

Crouch started his career as a trainee at Tottenham before moves to QPR, Portsmouth, Aston Villa, Norwich, Southampton and Liverpool

Considering Parry's still at the club, I'm surprised he didn't accept less than £9m.

For waht it's worth, I think we'll let him go for £10m. Makes a change for us to hold other clubs to ransom over players and not the other way round.

Owzat wrote:

Scottbot wrote:Redknapp thinks anymore than 9mill is silly money? Well hold on a minute mate, you sold the guy for 7 million 3 years ago. Since that time he's become an England regular, scored goals in the Champions League, scored goals and been successful for a top side and he's only 2 million better? I reckon we can and should get another 1-2 mill for the lad.

He's an England SQUAD regular, not starting he isn't. As for scoring goals, well for England it was against predominantly sh1 te sides and for Liverpool ditto.

Liverpool 2005/6-2007/8 : P179 W105 D38 L38
Without Crouch's goals : P179 W95 D42 L42

Massive impact - not! Most of his CL goals have come against Maccabi Haifa, PSV, Kaunas, Besiktas, Galatasaray and Bordeaux. Some not the worst sides but not the best either. And his record against the top sides - Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal - still is pretty ordinary at 6 goals in 26 appearances, half of those his hat-trick against Arsenal when their defence was asleep.

We should take £9m, there's no way pompey will get dragged into a Barny situation and we could end up with no buyers for a player who, after the Barnsley game, played just 9 games out of 19 and just 400 mins - including three full games in reserves as the rest were rested and one start of importance to the club (vs Arsenal in CL). £2m profit would be good business for an unwanted player who has sometimes looked good enough but not often

Sabre wrote:Stats are a mathematical tool that if correctly used can provide useful info.

But more often than not the stats that are given give a partial, unsubstantial and unreal info of the player. In Alonso's case it was those "Assists", and in Crouch's case those numbers who are always dependant of the context of the team.

For instance, besides my opinion, I gave here Torres' numbers in Spain to argue that I was worried about his impact here.

And what did we do with those numbers and stats?



And rightly so. 

This post is 72.7% accurate, plus or minus 5%.  This raises Sabre's average post accuracy to 61.2% which marks a 0.82% increase from last month.  He still has a long way to go to get back to the level he was performing at before his disastrous Torres predictions but his credibility coefficient once again lies comfortably within acceptable parameters.