andy_g wrote:as you often remind us, peewee, you first stood on the kop at the age of 6 and have been to literally hundred's of games since. you are obviously familar then with what is commonly known as the liverpool way, and this club as usually had a fairly honourable way of going about its business. and lets not forget that every single professional football club is to all extents and purposes a business. surely you have an attachment to that kind of sound running, and i'm talking about honourable as opposed to especially astute, and honesty with the fans that the club is known for. something we have all had the benefit of over the various lengths of our support.
it amazes me in the context of all this that you are prepared to back hicks so much and to put him to the back of your mind 'as long as the footie is ok'. you've surely looked at hicks's past record and seen for yourself the clear lies and constant insincerity he has spouted at us since he's been here. why do you want to give him the chance to put us deeply in the sh.it?
peewee wrote:andy_g wrote:as you often remind us, peewee, you first stood on the kop at the age of 6 and have been to literally hundred's of games since. you are obviously familar then with what is commonly known as the liverpool way, and this club as usually had a fairly honourable way of going about its business. and lets not forget that every single professional football club is to all extents and purposes a business. surely you have an attachment to that kind of sound running, and i'm talking about honourable as opposed to especially astute, and honesty with the fans that the club is known for. something we have all had the benefit of over the various lengths of our support.
it amazes me in the context of all this that you are prepared to back hicks so much and to put him to the back of your mind 'as long as the footie is ok'. you've surely looked at hicks's past record and seen for yourself the clear lies and constant insincerity he has spouted at us since he's been here. why do you want to give him the chance to put us deeply in the sh.it?
sadly i feel the liverpool way went out of the window many years ago, as for hicks, i thought i made it clear i am not pro hicks, just want him to have a chance, if we are talking about past history lets not forget DIC intended to sell after a few years at a profit, they see us as an investment also so why would they be any better
Lando_Griffin wrote:peewee wrote:andy_g wrote:as you often remind us, peewee, you first stood on the kop at the age of 6 and have been to literally hundred's of games since. you are obviously familar then with what is commonly known as the liverpool way, and this club as usually had a fairly honourable way of going about its business. and lets not forget that every single professional football club is to all extents and purposes a business. surely you have an attachment to that kind of sound running, and i'm talking about honourable as opposed to especially astute, and honesty with the fans that the club is known for. something we have all had the benefit of over the various lengths of our support.
it amazes me in the context of all this that you are prepared to back hicks so much and to put him to the back of your mind 'as long as the footie is ok'. you've surely looked at hicks's past record and seen for yourself the clear lies and constant insincerity he has spouted at us since he's been here. why do you want to give him the chance to put us deeply in the sh.it?
sadly i feel the liverpool way went out of the window many years ago, as for hicks, i thought i made it clear i am not pro hicks, just want him to have a chance, if we are talking about past history lets not forget DIC intended to sell after a few years at a profit, they see us as an investment also so why would they be any better
Bull. You want to be controversial by backing a fellow Billy big-B*llocks - nothing more.
Return to Football Related Polls
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests