Liverpool FC Forum

by **woof woof !** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:10 pm

s@int wrote:I see nothing wrong in quoting posts (I do it alot ) as long as its football discussion and not trading insults.

You're on my list Pike ! sorry , Saint .

Nothing wrong with incorporating a couple of quotes in a post, but NINE quotes from two people playing head tennis with each other is imo beyond the pale.

by **Fo Dne** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:09 pm

woof woof ! wrote:Stu, they (the quotes) go back three days and are unnecessary , particularly as there's only two members involved in the conversation, I'm assuming like me the rest of the forum had lost interest hence my suggestion the do it by pm or get a f'ucking room .

Woof, to be fair, alot of the time I can't be arsed looking over a hole topic and would rather see it in posts such as that, it makes it easier as you can often comment on one particular part of the conversation...

If you don't like the feature, maybe it should be removed permanently so there is no option to do it...

by **account deleted by request** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:27 pm

woof woof ! wrote:
s@int wrote:I see nothing wrong in quoting posts (I do it alot ) as long as its football discussion and not trading insults.

You're on my list Pike ! sorry , Saint .

Nothing wrong with incorporating a couple of quotes in a post, but NINE quotes from two people playing head tennis with each other is imo beyond the pale.

I hope that was Pike ( dad's Army) and not short for Pikey, Woof

by **woof woof !** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:57 pm

Fo Dne wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:Stu, they (the quotes) go back three days and are unnecessary , particularly as there's only two members involved in the conversation, I'm assuming like me the rest of the forum had lost interest hence my suggestion the do it by pm or get a f'ucking room .

Woof, to be fair, alot of the time I can't be arsed looking over a hole topic and would rather see it in posts such as that, it makes it easier as you can often comment on one particular part of the conversation...

Fair point , maybe browsing all the threads everyday has made me hyper sensitive to spamfever.

by **woof woof !** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 7:57 pm

s@int wrote:
woof woof ! wrote:
s@int wrote:I see nothing wrong in quoting posts (I do it alot ) as long as its football discussion and not trading insults.

You're on my list Pike ! sorry , Saint .

Nothing wrong with incorporating a couple of quotes in a post, but NINE quotes from two people playing head tennis with each other is imo beyond the pale.

I hope that was Pike ( dad's Army) and not short for Pikey, Woof

, Dads Army Saint, Dads Army

by **Kharhaz** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:20 pm

dawson99 wrote:people on here who keep slating kuyt arent liverpool fans in my opinion - im just sick of EVERY game the same people saying how much kuyt sucked, give it a rest!

Its a kind of attention seeking. Nobody agrees on my other points lets go back to the "Kuyt sucks" argument then im loved again !

Pathetic.

by **Thingy** » Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:36 pm

Alrite sorry Woof . Still gettin used to this forum stuff , so dont bite! No pun intended

by **Fo Dne** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:40 am

Thingy wrote:Alrite sorry Woof . Still gettin used to this forum stuff , so dont bite! No pun intended

That was almost funny...

by **bigmick** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:45 am

It is more pointless than annoying all that quoting multiple post b0ll0cks . Does anyone really imagine a reader is going to think, "now lets see, he said this, then he said this back, and his reply to that was that, then he came back with that etc etc". No, the reader just reads the original (new) bit and ignores the rest. It's Ok if you quote one post and say, "that's b0ll0cks", but not a whole conversation. Totally pointless.

by **Thingy** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:47 am

As ive said i apoligise for gettin on some of yer nerves with the multiple quoting stuff,i wont do it in future. Didnt realise it was a problem.

by **Toffeehater** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:51 am

Yea guess i owe u guyz an aoplogy too , woof in particular , must be that time of the month

.

I'm just sick like dawson , people who keep slating kuyt , he's played well yet he gets the stick that he does not deserve

by **Seano Kop** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:33 am

Another good game against Blackburn. Shoulda have been the man that set up the first goal. I don't know what happened to Gerrard's shot (Iactually thought it was deflected but I guess not)

by **Owzat** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:15 am

We're on a good run of form since the FA Cup, Kuyt's started all but three and we've won 10 out of 13. That should be what matters most, what's best for the team. But seems to be the way these days that few will give credit to a player they've got it in for and there are plenty who will argue

I'm sorely tempted to start a Kuyt thread along the lines of the Pennant thread "no need for a..........."

by **Seano Kop** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:44 am

Owzat wrote:We're on a good run of form since the FA Cup, Kuyt's started all but three and we've won 10 out of 13. That should be what matters most, what's best for the team. But seems to be the way these days that few will give credit to a player they've got it in for and there are plenty who will argue

I'm sorely tempted to start a Kuyt thread along the lines of the Pennant thread "no need for a..........."

by **Toffeehater** » Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:53 am

Owzat wrote:We're on a good run of form since the FA Cup, Kuyt's started all but three and we've won 10 out of 13. That should be what matters most, what's best for the team. But seems to be the way these days that few will give credit to a player they've got it in for and there are plenty who will argue

I'm sorely tempted to start a Kuyt thread along the lines of the Pennant thread "no need for a..........."

Liverpool FC Forum

The dirk kuyt debate....is he good enough?

Who is online