Liverpool FC Forum

Seano Kop wrote:

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:

Seano Kop wrote:That is pretty stupid. How can you judge Leto already as well btw? I rpesume that's who you mean by 'Lato'

Can you tell me, why we would play Crouch? We have a 4-2-3-1 formation. ONE striker. And Torres is obviously a much better choice than Crouch. Kuyt is very useful on the wings, Riise is a very good rightback, as is Aurelio at times.

The only thing I agree with is Voronin.

this is pretty stupid.

You've tried to belittle someone by saying they can't spell Leto, then you go and prove your football knowledge by saying Riise and Aurelio are RIGHTbacks, when if either kicked the ball with their right foot they'd fall over. Next time you try and belittle someone to make yourself feel better make sure you know what you're on about.

You know I meant left back..... I don't know if he meant Leto tho

Seano Kop wrote:That is pretty stupid. How can you judge Leto already as well btw? I rpesume that's who you mean by 'Lato'

Can you tell me, why we would play Crouch? We have a 4-2-3-1 formation. ONE striker. And Torres is obviously a much better choice than Crouch. Kuyt is very useful on the wings, Riise is a very good rightback, as is Aurelio at times.

The only thing I agree with is Voronin.

Ace Ventura wrote:Fair enough Owzat, name the competitive games that Crouch has started that he has failed in.

The reason he hasnt scored against these sides invariably is because he hasnt been selected.

Doesnt the goal to knock united out of the FA cup and the hat-trick against Arsenal prove that he IS capable against the bigger sides if he is given a chance ?

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:

Owzat wrote:Ace - go read my comments on the match, I didn't slate Crouch for scoring against Arsenal.

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:

Owzat wrote:And Crouch of the three will likely command the highest fee, not because he's (much/any) better than others, but because teams are interested in him and quite probably because he's tall and scored goals for England - albeit against mostly naff sides.

it's fans like you who really get on my tits.

"Crouch has scored for england albeit against naff sides" You can only score what's put in front of you. How often has Crouch played against Brazil, Argentina, Italy, France or Germany? He can't score against Brazil if he's playing against Jamaica can he? Croatia topped England's group for qualification to Euro 2008 yet Crouch managed to score against them. Also he scored three against Jamacia...I don't recall Owen, Rooney, Torres, Villa, Kaka, Ronaladino, Henry or Anelka getting a hattrick against Jamacia for their repesctive countries. Crouch has never let England down and if Crouch didn't score against these "naff sides" England wouldn't of been even in a chance of qualifying. Scoring against "naff sides" is just as important as scoring as against top sides.

Those same players never scored record goals in qualifiers, does that make Healy better than them........?

T1ts like you get on my t1ts , his record doesn't lie and it is one of success against weaker sides. Do those strikers mentioned have a 1 in 3 scoring record? And do they boast just TWO career hat-tricks?

I know where you're coming from because I've seen it, read it and heard it all before. If you think the mark of a quality striker is scoring against weak sides then you truly are a t1t. Did you consider that top strikers don't need to fill their boots against weak sides to prove themselves? Owen knows a hat-trick against Jamaica won't secure him a starting place, the same as Crouch found out. Or by your own daft comparison perhaps  his is better than any of "Owen, Rooney, Torres, Villa, Kaka, Ronaladino, Henry or Anelka".

And congratulations for identifying the ONE decent side Crouch has scored against in a COMPETITIVE match. Is that the same Croatia Rooney scored two against in Euro 2004? You left out his brace against Andorra, strikers scoring goals against them must be impressing you all the time. So which one's who've scored plenty of goals against the same opposition as Crouch do you want to sign? I'm guessing none, because your argument is weak as water.

like I said, how many times has Crouch played against the best national sides?

Obviously on your theory goals agaisnt "weaker" sides aren't important, so lets just forget 21 goals that Torres has scored this year in the league shall we? Idiot.

Without Crouch's goals against "weaker" sides, the likes of Owen and Rooney wouldn't be going to euros and world cups. And as for this 99 game bollox, how many of those has he started...oh wait yeah I forgot, you class 30 seconds against Everton as one of those games don't you. Again, idiot.

So how come this arguement works for our players... but not when you're discussing Christiano Ronaldo?

Seano Kop wrote:Leto is young and hasnt really been playing in this league

Seano Kop wrote:He's in the reserves, and playing well, thus why he got 1 or 2 call ups to the senior side.

Fo Dne wrote:

Seano Kop wrote:Leto is young and hasnt really been playing in this league

Because he's completely rubbish.

End of.

You're a very angry and argumerntative man/woman *delete as appropriate...
Did someone break your crayons ?
Why don't you go out and get yer Nat King....maybe that'll calm you down a bit...
Then come back here and be nice, OK ?

Fo Dne wrote:

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:

Owzat wrote:Ace - go read my comments on the match, I didn't slate Crouch for scoring against Arsenal.

god_bless_john_houlding wrote:

Owzat wrote:And Crouch of the three will likely command the highest fee, not because he's (much/any) better than others, but because teams are interested in him and quite probably because he's tall and scored goals for England - albeit against mostly naff sides.

it's fans like you who really get on my tits.

"Crouch has scored for england albeit against naff sides" You can only score what's put in front of you. How often has Crouch played against Brazil, Argentina, Italy, France or Germany? He can't score against Brazil if he's playing against Jamaica can he? Croatia topped England's group for qualification to Euro 2008 yet Crouch managed to score against them. Also he scored three against Jamacia...I don't recall Owen, Rooney, Torres, Villa, Kaka, Ronaladino, Henry or Anelka getting a hattrick against Jamacia for their repesctive countries. Crouch has never let England down and if Crouch didn't score against these "naff sides" England wouldn't of been even in a chance of qualifying. Scoring against "naff sides" is just as important as scoring as against top sides.

Those same players never scored record goals in qualifiers, does that make Healy better than them........?

T1ts like you get on my t1ts , his record doesn't lie and it is one of success against weaker sides. Do those strikers mentioned have a 1 in 3 scoring record? And do they boast just TWO career hat-tricks?

I know where you're coming from because I've seen it, read it and heard it all before. If you think the mark of a quality striker is scoring against weak sides then you truly are a t1t. Did you consider that top strikers don't need to fill their boots against weak sides to prove themselves? Owen knows a hat-trick against Jamaica won't secure him a starting place, the same as Crouch found out. Or by your own daft comparison perhaps  his is better than any of "Owen, Rooney, Torres, Villa, Kaka, Ronaladino, Henry or Anelka".

And congratulations for identifying the ONE decent side Crouch has scored against in a COMPETITIVE match. Is that the same Croatia Rooney scored two against in Euro 2004? You left out his brace against Andorra, strikers scoring goals against them must be impressing you all the time. So which one's who've scored plenty of goals against the same opposition as Crouch do you want to sign? I'm guessing none, because your argument is weak as water.

like I said, how many times has Crouch played against the best national sides?

Obviously on your theory goals agaisnt "weaker" sides aren't important, so lets just forget 21 goals that Torres has scored this year in the league shall we? Idiot.

Without Crouch's goals against "weaker" sides, the likes of Owen and Rooney wouldn't be going to euros and world cups. And as for this 99 game bollox, how many of those has he started...oh wait yeah I forgot, you class 30 seconds against Everton as one of those games don't you. Again, idiot.

So how come this arguement works for our players... but not when you're discussing Christiano Ronaldo?

Because, Stu, when John does it he's only having a laugh, after all.  Haven't you heard of that famous Scouse humour?   The sensible approach is to assume everything he says is intended as a p!ss-take: Pennant v. Ronaldo, zonal marking...the lot. 

Fo Dne wrote:

Ace Ventura wrote:Fair enough Owzat, name the competitive games that Crouch has started that he has failed in.

The reason he hasnt scored against these sides invariably is because he hasnt been selected.

Doesnt the goal to knock united out of the FA cup and the hat-trick against Arsenal prove that he IS capable against the bigger sides if he is given a chance ?

No it doesn't ace.

The fact it took Gallas and Toure to have probably the worst game in there Career at the same time allowed Crouch to score that hatrick. Yes he was good enough to take advantage of that, but that doesn't make him a class player.

He's a decent player who played well and caught those two on a very bad day. Against all of the top sides he gets marked out of games and completely fails to influence games. He's not mobile enough or strong enough and doesn't have enough game intelligence to really be considered a top class player.

I find it quite laughable that people only ever look at the positives and our own players rather than the rest of the league. No-one seems to use the other teams as a bench mark and thats the hole problem with our "support". They are too blind to see the truth about some of our own.

The only players in our team that would get near the other top sides are Gerrard, Torres, Reina and you cuold possibly have a case for Alonso (at his best) and Mascherano. The rest wouldn't get a sniff.