Islam under the spotlight again - Ludicrous misrepresentation

Please use this forum for general Non-Football related chat

Postby babu » Tue Nov 27, 2007 3:38 pm

i would suggest looking at this without the tag of Islam to it. (yes i know the name is religous, but try thinking about this without Islam attached.)
Image



                                   *    *    *    *    *
User avatar
babu
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Malaysia

Postby dawson99 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:12 pm

so saying mohammed is blasphemus is not because of religion? do me a lemon. its a naff religion that is more like the spanish inquisition
0118 999 881 999 119 7253
Image
User avatar
dawson99
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 25377
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: in the mo fo hood y'all

Postby Sabre » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:19 pm

It's simple. Probably the thread that Woollyback opened the other day is blasphemus from a catholic point of view.


But, if he writes that post in Spain, nothing will happen but some members laughing the joke, and *a few* maybe being offended.

If he wrote the same thread in the Spain of 50 years ago (imagine internet existed) Woolyback would have been arrested.

So, what's the real problem? the religion? or the extremist religious interpretations and the policitians that use that interpretations to cut the freedom of speech? it's the latter IMHO.

As far as I have talked with some muslims, they are men of peace, and for what is worth with many points in common with Christians. Of course, then there are the muslim radicals that make the interpretation they want. But the problems are the extremists, not the religion per se.
Last edited by Sabre on Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
SOS member #1499

Drummerphil, never forgotten.
User avatar
Sabre
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13178
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:10 am
Location: San Sebastian (Spain)

Postby LFC2007 » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:28 pm

Sabre wrote:If he wrote the same thread in the Spain of 50 years ago (imagine internet existed) Woolyback would have been arrested.

:laugh:
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Judge » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:00 pm

babu wrote:i would suggest looking at this without the tag of Islam to it. (yes i know the name is religous, but try thinking about this without Islam attached.)

when i say christ that fucking cat, doesnt mean im being disrespectful to jesus   :D
Image
User avatar
Judge
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 20477
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:21 am

Postby hello_red » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:15 pm

Jesus Christ! What in gods name are they playing at?

Knock knock

Whos there

Muhammed

Muhammed who?

How dare you!
User avatar
hello_red
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: West Lancs

Postby metalhead » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:30 pm

Sabre wrote:The religion per se is not a problem, interested interpretations of religions is the problem.

spot on mate
ImageImageImage
User avatar
metalhead
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 17476
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: Milan, Italy

Postby Roger Red Hat » Tue Nov 27, 2007 5:47 pm

fk 'em, they're not worth a carrot anyway. they should be taught a few lessons in how to behave.

Ive stopped been careful now, too much has happened recently to make me be careful what Im saying where...   I just tell it like it is now.
Sex, drugs and sausage rolls!
User avatar
Roger Red Hat
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 7669
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 9:59 am
Location: Yorkshire

Postby THEBARON » Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:02 pm

Whatever happened to live and let live?

Having been over there and know people who work and live there now ( Muslim  countries ) the main problem is that the majority of muslims are peaceful and tolerant people - but all we hear about are the minority of radicals who seem hell bent on violence. The problem is that they are a significant minority who tend to have strong media links and can express their views.
There are things that go on that shocking and barbaric over there.
But if you chose to work in these countries then this is a risk you take.....
User avatar
THEBARON
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 8:21 pm

Postby zarababe » Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:33 pm

Bamaga man wrote:Awful beliefs, awful laws, therefore awful people it has to be said.

Backward cultures, adopt fuedal backward ways - Isalm is not to blame please ppl - ediot ppl who use Islam to control their peoples, strike fear in them and so on are to blame.

What's in a name ay... every other somali is called Muhammed - imagine how many are sworn at daily before the name - so is that blasphemous - hell no.

I would expect some of you on here to realise the difference between the religion of Islam and some of its backward sh*t believers - PLEASE.

Condemn the backward nations who soil the nemae of Islam - not the religion.

Thank you

Zara
THE BRENDAN REVOLUTION IS UPON US !

KING KENNY.. Always LEGEND !

RAFA.. MADE THE PEOPLE HAPPY !

Miss YOU Phil-Drummer - RIP YNWA

Image

Image
User avatar
zarababe
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 11731
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: London

Postby hello_red » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:26 am

zarababe wrote:
Bamaga man wrote:Awful beliefs, awful laws, therefore awful people it has to be said.

Backward cultures, adopt fuedal backward ways - Isalm is not to blame please ppl - ediot ppl who use Islam to control their peoples, strike fear in them and so on are to blame.

What's in a name ay... every other somali is called Muhammed - imagine how many are sworn at daily before the name - so is that blasphemous - hell no.

I would expect some of you on here to realise the difference between the religion of Islam and some of its backward sh*t believers - PLEASE.

Condemn the backward nations who soil the nemae of Islam - not the religion.

Thank you

Zara

I suppose you can look at Islam now like Catholacism in  Europe in our past. It was a religion used to control the peoples of Europe. Exactly the same thing is happeing now in the middle east. Civilisation started in the middle east, we only received it after the Meditaranian did.

Its a pity.
User avatar
hello_red
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 805
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: West Lancs

Postby The Manhattan Project » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:49 am

I think we are getting to the point where Manhattan needs to create a new world-unifying religion or at least a school of philosophical thought.

Because it's clear that the existing ones just aren't good enough.
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby babu » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:53 am

dawson99 wrote:so saying mohammed is blasphemus is not because of religion? do me a lemon. its a naff religion that is more like the spanish inquisition

that's exactly what i am saying Dawson. Its more cultural than anything. That stuff doesn't happen here and this is a muslim country
Image



                                   *    *    *    *    *
User avatar
babu
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:28 pm
Location: Malaysia

Postby red37 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:10 am

Yer alright - we get the message Islam is not to blame ....its the interpretation of it ruling by fear, to some. Whatever.

The point is - not being able to even utter the name of Mohammed without punishment. In ANY sector of its following/teachings/oppressed nations and as a statement of intent (from whomever) is absolutely f**king backwardly barmy!

Not interested in the broader spectrum here. We are talkng about a group of kids naming a F**king teddy bear - for pity's sake.
Image



TITANS of HOPE
User avatar
red37
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 7884
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:00 pm

Postby bigmick » Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:55 am

dawson99 wrote:? do me a lemon.

Sounds like one of your "darn sarf" cokneyism's Daws. I kind of get the feeling it has to be a rhyme for favour but I might be wrong. It was used in my part of "Landen" as a desription of a bloke thinking he's a bit of a man about town, a bit of a lemon (lemon squeezer-geezer). Do me a lemon though mate, you got me???
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat Forum

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e