stmichael wrote:I made this point elsewhere and I'll make it again here.
Even if we do sign a top notch striker it remains to be seen whether Benitez will adapt his rotation system to accommodate him.
Personally I think Crouch should start more often but at this point I don't care what the partnership is but I'd love to see two of them getting a chance to develop a partnership of some kind. I know the sometimes use of one up front precludes this in every game but surely if a couple of these guys played 10 games in a row together then they develop a better partnership?
What's the point in spending 20 million on a striker who plays every third game with a different partner than he did three games previously?
Why is stability at the back more important than stability up front?
I still think we need a better striker but I think he needs to stop fcking around with the striking combination too.
Guido the Killer Pimp wrote:hicks has said in the papers that he will support rafa in the transfer market but "won't be spending money like a drunken sailor". i'm assuming he will have told benitez roughly what kind of limits he has, plus we will bring in say £9m if we let bellamy go and maybe 50p for salif diao, maybe a few mil for cisse
ie. enough money all in for a couple of decent calibre players. but what about parry's "2 high profile signings next week"? or was he just stringing us along and referring to gerrard & carra extending their contracts?
either way this is beginning to smell distinctly like last season. i haven't heard any stories about simao this week either, isn't it about time that rumour came up again?
puroresu wrote:Guido the Killer Pimp wrote:hicks has said in the papers that he will support rafa in the transfer market but "won't be spending money like a drunken sailor". i'm assuming he will have told benitez roughly what kind of limits he has, plus we will bring in say £9m if we let bellamy go and maybe 50p for salif diao, maybe a few mil for cisse
ie. enough money all in for a couple of decent calibre players. but what about parry's "2 high profile signings next week"? or was he just stringing us along and referring to gerrard & carra extending their contracts?
either way this is beginning to smell distinctly like last season. i haven't heard any stories about simao this week either, isn't it about time that rumour came up again?
Nothing other than Benfica saying £12 mil is the amount they want for Simao. Nothing less
redmikey wrote:i am a little worried that the undertones from hicks and gillet have changed from we will buy any player rafa wants to well we won't be spending like a drunken sailor
LFC2007 wrote:redmikey wrote:i am a little worried that the undertones from hicks and gillet have changed from we will buy any player rafa wants to well we won't be spending like a drunken sailor
Hicks and Gillett said they would back Rafa and that signing players was "player specific".
Saying words to the effect of "we're not going to p!ss money up the wall" doesn't change anything in any way. Would you expect them to declare they want to spend money like a "drunken sailor"?
stmichael wrote:All this mess would go away if the Americans and Parry just got their heads together and decided to give Rafa the budget he needs (within reason), and to take some decisive action to try and get the players he wants.
As things stand, that has not happened but it's not too late for them to do that, which is why I'm not going overboard on it until it's clear they haven't done what they said they were going to.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 64 guests