Ace Ventura wrote:bigmick wrote:I was disappointed in him sabes to be honest. Even though it takes time for a player to settle, there is usually a flash here and there, a fleeting glimpse of quality which keeps up the belief but in the case of Gonzales he showed precious little to be truthful. Even the much vaunted searing pace seems to have been a little over hyped and while I'd love to see him come good and fully respect the views of those liek yourself who've seen much more of him than me, I'd be surprised if he comes out next season and makes the grade at Liverpool.
Sorry to quote you mick when the question is to Sabre, its just that i am adding to what you were stating.
Sabre you respect Aldo due to his connections with your hometown club, what do you think about his opinions on Mark ?
Aldo has for months been criticising him massively on Radio city, our local station.
He said the other week that when he was trying to get back it looked like he had a parachute on his back.
Then against Fulham he was saying he was having one of the worst games aldo has EVER seen in an LFC shirt, and that he needs to go because it was clear he will never cut it.
Your thoughts mate.
jeffiroquai wrote:Sabes, I too am holding out for Gonzo to perform. Those who say he has lacked signs of flair have a short memory. That goal he scored against the Israelis in the qualifiers was absolutely vital for us to be in the position we are today. Hopefully the lad will settle more in training, and we will have a combination of Harry/Gonzo to use next season.
As far as Pennant, the comparisons cannot truely be made. The lad grew up in England, so no settling was required. He was shocking early on this year, but he continued to get a run out on the pitch. This allowed his confidence to grow, as the team improved through out the season. Rafa has not shown the same trust in Gonzo as he has JP. He does not put him out there in important situations, ever. See Bolo in the semis as an example.
Back to the thread topic! It is nearly impossible to watch the spanish game here in the states. It is not on TV anywere. I have seen both Silva and Vicente in the Champions League, but that is it. That being said, I would prefer to groom Gonzo, and pray Kewell stays fit, so we can focus our transfer money on our two serious needs. Left back and a target man.
Bad Bob wrote:jeffiroquai wrote:Sabes, I too am holding out for Gonzo to perform. Those who say he has lacked signs of flair have a short memory. That goal he scored against the Israelis in the qualifiers was absolutely vital for us to be in the position we are today. Hopefully the lad will settle more in training, and we will have a combination of Harry/Gonzo to use next season.
As far as Pennant, the comparisons cannot truely be made. The lad grew up in England, so no settling was required. He was shocking early on this year, but he continued to get a run out on the pitch. This allowed his confidence to grow, as the team improved through out the season. Rafa has not shown the same trust in Gonzo as he has JP. He does not put him out there in important situations, ever. See Bolo in the semis as an example.
Back to the thread topic! It is nearly impossible to watch the spanish game here in the states. It is not on TV anywere. I have seen both Silva and Vicente in the Champions League, but that is it. That being said, I would prefer to groom Gonzo, and pray Kewell stays fit, so we can focus our transfer money on our two serious needs. Left back and a target man.
Sorry, mate, but I can't agree with what you've said here. I'll keep my Gonzales comments to a minimum but I would suggest that Pennant's been given more of a run than Gonzales by Rafa because Rafa has more faith in Pennant as a player. Put another way, this is the gaffer's way of saying that, at the moment, Pennant is fit to wear the shirt whereas Gonzales is not (at least not in games that matter). Based on their comparative form over the whole season, I find very little wrong with that assessment.
As for not needing a LM as much as a LB, I would suggest that, in Riise and Aurelio (with Arbeloa as back-up), we have good skill and depth at LB. Whereas, in Kewell and Gonzales, we have a player who's rarely fit and a player that has not yet shown that he is remotely suitable for a team challenging for major honours. So, I ask you, which position requires more attention this transfer window?
Bad Bob wrote:jeffiroquai wrote:Sabes, I too am holding out for Gonzo to perform. Those who say he has lacked signs of flair have a short memory. That goal he scored against the Israelis in the qualifiers was absolutely vital for us to be in the position we are today. Hopefully the lad will settle more in training, and we will have a combination of Harry/Gonzo to use next season.
As far as Pennant, the comparisons cannot truely be made. The lad grew up in England, so no settling was required. He was shocking early on this year, but he continued to get a run out on the pitch. This allowed his confidence to grow, as the team improved through out the season. Rafa has not shown the same trust in Gonzo as he has JP. He does not put him out there in important situations, ever. See Bolo in the semis as an example.
Back to the thread topic! It is nearly impossible to watch the spanish game here in the states. It is not on TV anywere. I have seen both Silva and Vicente in the Champions League, but that is it. That being said, I would prefer to groom Gonzo, and pray Kewell stays fit, so we can focus our transfer money on our two serious needs. Left back and a target man.
Sorry, mate, but I can't agree with what you've said here. I'll keep my Gonzales comments to a minimum but I would suggest that Pennant's been given more of a run than Gonzales by Rafa because Rafa has more faith in Pennant as a player. Put another way, this is the gaffer's way of saying that, at the moment, Pennant is fit to wear the shirt whereas Gonzales is not (at least not in games that matter). Based on their comparative form over the whole season, I find very little wrong with that assessment.
As for not needing a LM as much as a LB, I would suggest that, in Riise and Aurelio (with Arbeloa as back-up), we have good skill and depth at LB. Whereas, in Kewell and Gonzales, we have a player who's rarely fit and a player that has not yet shown that he is remotely suitable for a team challenging for major honours. So, I ask you, which position requires more attention this transfer window?
Sabre wrote:Bad Bob wrote:jeffiroquai wrote:Sabes, I too am holding out for Gonzo to perform. Those who say he has lacked signs of flair have a short memory. That goal he scored against the Israelis in the qualifiers was absolutely vital for us to be in the position we are today. Hopefully the lad will settle more in training, and we will have a combination of Harry/Gonzo to use next season.
As far as Pennant, the comparisons cannot truely be made. The lad grew up in England, so no settling was required. He was shocking early on this year, but he continued to get a run out on the pitch. This allowed his confidence to grow, as the team improved through out the season. Rafa has not shown the same trust in Gonzo as he has JP. He does not put him out there in important situations, ever. See Bolo in the semis as an example.
Back to the thread topic! It is nearly impossible to watch the spanish game here in the states. It is not on TV anywere. I have seen both Silva and Vicente in the Champions League, but that is it. That being said, I would prefer to groom Gonzo, and pray Kewell stays fit, so we can focus our transfer money on our two serious needs. Left back and a target man.
Sorry, mate, but I can't agree with what you've said here. I'll keep my Gonzales comments to a minimum but I would suggest that Pennant's been given more of a run than Gonzales by Rafa because Rafa has more faith in Pennant as a player. Put another way, this is the gaffer's way of saying that, at the moment, Pennant is fit to wear the shirt whereas Gonzales is not (at least not in games that matter). Based on their comparative form over the whole season, I find very little wrong with that assessment.
As for not needing a LM as much as a LB, I would suggest that, in Riise and Aurelio (with Arbeloa as back-up), we have good skill and depth at LB. Whereas, in Kewell and Gonzales, we have a player who's rarely fit and a player that has not yet shown that he is remotely suitable for a team challenging for major honours. So, I ask you, which position requires more attention this transfer window?
My irrelevant comment to Jeffiroquei, left this post that continued the debate in the last page, I'll forward it to this one so the footie debate continues.
yckatbjywtbiastkamb wrote:i watch a little bit of spanish footy on sky and from what i`ve seen of the lad, whilst he`s obviously skillfull, he does look to go to ground at any opportunity.
i dont think he`s robust enough for the prem.
i`ve not been convinced by gonzales either but some players take longer to settle in than others.
i`d be a bit deflated if we raided spain in the off season and never came back with a player with the profile of a villa, alves, eto or torres.
Sabes, what am I missing???
I think we agree on Gonzo, but now you and Bob have me confused. Are we talking the same thing?
zarababe wrote:Sabe - do you think, given recent history with players from la liga and the premiership that Villa could be successful here ?
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 70 guests