dawson99 wrote:lol, i believe it was amixture of wages plus a 20million+ 'have to buy him' clause. why tevez did not get this we will never know, but those dealings were so dodgy.
dawson99 wrote:"The case of Javier Mascherano is even more damning. When he made his West Ham debut in September then-coach Alan Pardew described his display as 'accomplished' and added that he looked outstanding in training.
Liverpool fans would nod their heads in agreement.
They have quickly seen that Mascherano is a class act, a holding midfielder who not only wins the ball, but has the technical gifts and the understanding of the game needed to set attacks in motion.
Admittedly, after a while it seems clear that West Ham were not selecting Mascherano for reasons that had nothing to do with his performances.
But before that there were months when he was treated as a bit-part player, given the odd substitute appearance here and there.
Could they really afford to leave out a player of his quality? A glance at the table suggests otherwise.
The fact that it has taken a Spanish coach to rescue him re-enforces the point that this has not been English football's finest hour. "
dont know if that explains anything, but it makes some sense to me. Basically it all comes down to politics and money (and ability stu) We have a higher standard of footy than west ham, masher plays better around a higher standard. Plus we play him more.Got a feelign we'll see the benefits next season
dawson99 wrote:Stu, dont shout at me again. Its boring. No, as we have said in the thread, he wasnt given the opportunity at west ham, but since his arrival at liverpool he has risen his game as the level he is playing and training with now has risen significantly...agree?
Stu.Murph wrote:dawson99 wrote:Stu, dont shout at me again. Its boring. No, as we have said in the thread, he wasnt given the opportunity at west ham, but since his arrival at liverpool he has risen his game as the level he is playing and training with now has risen significantly...agree?
I didn't see him train for West Ham and on his debeut he looked pretty good for me. Haven't seen anything from him I didn't see at the world cup or in his first game for West Ham.
Dya reckon we should sign MERCHANA Dawson?
dawson99 wrote:Stu.Murph wrote:dawson99 wrote:Stu, dont shout at me again. Its boring. No, as we have said in the thread, he wasnt given the opportunity at west ham, but since his arrival at liverpool he has risen his game as the level he is playing and training with now has risen significantly...agree?
I didn't see him train for West Ham and on his debeut he looked pretty good for me. Haven't seen anything from him I didn't see at the world cup or in his first game for West Ham.
Dya reckon we should sign MERCHANA Dawson?
seriously stu, f.uck off. if u arent gonna listen, just fukk off.
soemtimes you know what you are talking about. most times you are just a slimy miserable little kunt.
you are so narrow minded you havent read what ive written, i said, and ltry to understand retard: West Ham did not play him. Maybe when he trained with them the level was not as high as the players are not as good. Also there was the clause he had to not play.
understand that stuart? Need it explained again? Fukking cok knocker. How can someone with such abviously lack of friends annoy me so much?
with w@nks like this im not surprised people leave the forum.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 152 guests