bavlondon wrote:Ade wrote:stmichael wrote:tithead wrote:First things first, it was the mirror reporting that, secondly Chelsea would outbid you in wages and in a transfer fee, and Eto'o comes across as a huffy mercenary, happy to take the most money he can get.
I've got a funny feeling that the Chelsea silly money may be coming to an end. Abramovich seems to be losing interest, seems to resent it that Mourinho gets all the credit and wouldn't even let him buy that Bolton defender on a free in January.
I reckon next summer he'll only provide limited new cash and tell Mourinho to sell if he wants to spend. However if a new manager comes in Abramovich probably will get his chequebook out again.
I dont know if Roman himself is getting fed up with Chelsea or just with Mourinho but something is certainly going off there.
Another point regards Chelsea buying Eto'o or Villa is that they currently have Drogba and Shevchenko. Drogba is playing the very well and his goals are keeping them going. Shevchenko is Abramovichs good friend and is obviously the Chairmans first choice so therefore where would another superstar striker fit in?
I'll be very surprised if Maureen is still at Chelsea next season, and if it is Hiddink being lined up to replace him, he may be tempted to keep Robben, Dutch connections and all that. Anyway, Robben is injury prone, and seems to have motivational problems playing for the Champions this season - he's a funny one, but undoubtedly one of the world's best left wingers, so we've got to be interested.
I also think he likes us: he told Kuyt how great the atmosphere is at Anfield, 'though they don't like me'.
Eto'o would do just fine, though Tithead is right - he'll go to the biggest and richest club that are in for him. And if Rijkaard leaves Barca this summer, as he is thought to be, that might be Barca.
I'd prefer Villa, but he seems less than enthusiastic about coming to us.
I dont think Mourinho will be going anywhere. At the very least he will be given at least another year seeing as he did win the league back to back from his start.
Plus hasnt Abramovich personally contributed to Hiddinks wages as Russia manager. I doubt Hiddink would leave. But i may be wrong of course.
supersub wrote:Have to agree with tithead on that score.
I tnk hed be a great signing and hes still young enough,20m is a great price.But would Chelsea offer double that?They have lost alot of money this year and i dont think they will spend as much money.Id love to see him at Liverpool,i dont care how many strikers we have ,if we have him,hes first choice,bellamy can f off if we get eto'o,and i wouldnt not sign him because we "dont need another striker"hes a must buy if we have the money.
stmichael wrote:I saw a bit of "revista de la liga" last night on T.V. and Guilleme Balague reckons that due to the rift between Ronaldinho and Eto'o, Barca have decided to get shot of one of them and chosen to get rid of Eto'o. He's apparently been offered to the premiership "big four."
agoodmentality wrote:If we got £12M for Crouch off newcastle and £8M for Bellamy off Spurs, there's are £20M, we make a bid to for Torres, Eto'o or Villa and throw in VERY highly rated Luis Garcia into the deal,(who knows what they'll value him at).
Would a strike-force of (torres,eto'o,villa), Kuyt, Fowler and Voronin really be that bad?
don't bite me head off about the Luis Garcia thing, that could be the deal clincher![]()
am i living in a dream world or does that sound realistic?
club_Levis wrote:
BOODIDDY wrote:What about tevez though? His movement is great and at liverpool i think he could be awesome. Remember, i was the one who mentioned sissoko 8 months before rafa brought him here so i can judge a player.
Ade wrote:bavlondon wrote:Ade wrote:stmichael wrote:tithead wrote:First things first, it was the mirror reporting that, secondly Chelsea would outbid you in wages and in a transfer fee, and Eto'o comes across as a huffy mercenary, happy to take the most money he can get.
I've got a funny feeling that the Chelsea silly money may be coming to an end. Abramovich seems to be losing interest, seems to resent it that Mourinho gets all the credit and wouldn't even let him buy that Bolton defender on a free in January.
I reckon next summer he'll only provide limited new cash and tell Mourinho to sell if he wants to spend. However if a new manager comes in Abramovich probably will get his chequebook out again.
I dont know if Roman himself is getting fed up with Chelsea or just with Mourinho but something is certainly going off there.
Another point regards Chelsea buying Eto'o or Villa is that they currently have Drogba and Shevchenko. Drogba is playing the very well and his goals are keeping them going. Shevchenko is Abramovichs good friend and is obviously the Chairmans first choice so therefore where would another superstar striker fit in?
I'll be very surprised if Maureen is still at Chelsea next season, and if it is Hiddink being lined up to replace him, he may be tempted to keep Robben, Dutch connections and all that. Anyway, Robben is injury prone, and seems to have motivational problems playing for the Champions this season - he's a funny one, but undoubtedly one of the world's best left wingers, so we've got to be interested.
I also think he likes us: he told Kuyt how great the atmosphere is at Anfield, 'though they don't like me'.
Eto'o would do just fine, though Tithead is right - he'll go to the biggest and richest club that are in for him. And if Rijkaard leaves Barca this summer, as he is thought to be, that might be Barca.
I'd prefer Villa, but he seems less than enthusiastic about coming to us.
I dont think Mourinho will be going anywhere. At the very least he will be given at least another year seeing as he did win the league back to back from his start.
Plus hasnt Abramovich personally contributed to Hiddinks wages as Russia manager. I doubt Hiddink would leave. But i may be wrong of course.
Disagree mate. I think there will be two managerial vacancies in Spain in the summer, and both of them will tempt Mourinho. Barcelona or Madrid would both love him, despite his recent spat with Barca, and if Rijkaard and Capello leave – good chance both will – there aren't many hotter candidates than Maureen.
Yes, Abramovich pays Mourinho's wages as Russia coach, but the thinking is he'll allow Hiddink to combine the two jobs - something he did with the Australia job, providing he has a very strong assistant. And does anyone really think someone like Abramovich would be worried that Hiddink hasn't paid his taxes?
As for Mourinho and Abramovich, that boat is well and truly on fire.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 71 guests