Liverpool FC Forum

by **The Manhattan Project** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 3:51 am

Dead Idiot! See what he done to folk?

I have.

But I'm a realist in political terms. All I'm interested in is the oil.

by **zarababe** » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:17 pm

by **metalhead** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:07 am

The Manhattan Project wrote:
Dead Idiot! See what he done to folk?

I have.

But I'm a realist in political terms. All I'm interested in is the oil.

George Bush in disguese i see...

by **The Manhattan Project** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 1:01 am

George Bush in disguese i see...

Oil is what it's all about. The other reasons don't convince.

A) "The People Were Suffering"

So were the East Timorese. But the West still supported Indonesia who committed many atrocities on that part of the island.

B) "He May Have Had Weapons".

Iran and North Korea definately have weapons. What makes the West think that they are any less dangerous than Saddam Hussein?

C) "He Didn't Abide By The UN Resolutions"

Since when did anyone take the UN seriously?

D) "Al-Qaeda Were Being Supported In Iraq"

They are all over the place. Heck, the September 11th hijackers were training in Florida. Should they bomb Florida too? Al-Qaeda could have cells in Leicester for we all know. Besides, how does having a lawless Iraq make it any less difficult for terrorists to operate?

It comes down to a cost benefit analysis.

1) Is it cheaper to develop alternative fuels for vehicles to replace petroleum, or 2) is it more economical to overthrow non-cooperative regimes and/or support regimes in the world that will give us access to vast oil fields?

I would hope that the answer to Question 1 is "yes" because if the answer to question 2 is "yes" then we'll be bogged down in conflict until the oil finally runs out.

by **joko** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:54 am

manhattan in this matter is a wiser

by **peterc1992** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:34 pm

sophe_lfc_4_lyf wrote:They could of maybe killed him like a nicer way?

,why kill him in a nicer way if he didnt kill the 1000's of others(he killed)in a nicer way,when i seen the video i was kinda fealing sorry for him too but the :censored:

deserves it he didnt show any mercy for the thousand others

i think that was actually the nicest way to kill him,they show have left him out i the middle of london or new york and let him be stoned to death or something,thts wat i would have loved to c,or lock him in a cell with rapist and paedophiles and leave him naked with them, :grinning:

not digging at u but thats my opinion :buttrock

by **sophe_lfc_4_lyf** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:37 pm

Yea but like..
I didnt even think you could hand people? I thoguht it was illegal

by **peterc1992** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:39 pm

well hanging ur mate out the back garden is ilegal but when tried and sentenced to death it is legal,some one told me that if the hanging failed,that he cant be hanged again,it in the law i think

by **sophe_lfc_4_lyf** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:40 pm

Ohh i never thought it was legal at all

by **sophe_lfc_4_lyf** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:42 pm

And what was the point in putting a scarf on him, so he didnt get rope burns?
I think the last thing he would be worries about was getting rope burns, when he was about to get hung

by **peterc1992** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:44 pm

yeh i know but they didnt want to have a bloody mess

by **sophe_lfc_4_lyf** » Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:45 pm

Haha thats nice of them

Liverpool FC Forum

Saddam imminent execution - Within 48hours

Who is online