Liverpool FC Forum

by **Lando_Griffin** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:41 am

This poor b*stard fell asleep reading this thread.

During his slumber, he has missed His Daughter's birth, her first step, her first day at school, her first date, her first boyfriend, and her wedding.

He briefly woke to see his Granddaughter's birth, caught a glimpse of this again, and instantly blacked out.

His Granddaughter is now 17, pregnant with her 7th child, and a crack-whore.

All becasue of this thread.

by **The Manhattan Project** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:00 am

The statistic that i had mentioned on my previous posts.The photos that I had sent a PM to you before.

Manhattan never opened that PM.

Then tell me problems of East part of Istanbul. Because Istanbul is one of the most popular city of the World. I will accept East New York, East Pekin, East Paris,….

New York and Paris certainly belong in the "world city" catagory, but to say that Istanbul is on the same level as those cities but London is not, is quite frankly ridiculous.

And Bob Gedolf. Who the hell is he? Realy i dont know. I tried to search on Google Turkiye but unfortunately found nothing… And really i wonder something that do i need to know who Bob Gedolf is, to show my backround studies?

Try Wikipedia.

The correct word isn’t “unwilling” for me. Because Arab World dont care intervene of foreign nations to internal issues of their cognates’ and lack of the authority is rising the hostilities. This is not “unwilling”. This is a nation’s out of heart.

If they cannot intervene due to internal pressures and a policy which they refuse to interfere in the affairs of other nations (even those of their fellow Muslims being allegedly oppressed) then they are "unwilling"....to intervene.

Dude, you want to be sarcastic. But doing sarcasim to me rather doing sarcasm to a Turk about this issue is absurd.

It's not necessarily sarcasm, but more a parody of the one-sided view that some have of a given situation/conflict.

Check the history of Jewish people. You will see that only Ottoman had acepted Jewish people and given them lands to live after Spain had pis.sed them off. If we looked them as evils, our grandfathers wouldn’t have done that. So i am mentioning reality. I am not making comment. Israel’s actions are mercilessly. THAT IS ALL.

Merciless? No. They were targeting certain areas where they believed terrorists were located. Unfortunately terrorists have a tendency to hide among civilians populations in heavily urbanised areas. Thus the casualities are the result (which the terrorists use to rally more support to their cause).

So if anything Israel were "careless".

And my comments weren't aimed at the entire Turkish nation.

Just one Turkish reporter.

No. I am citing my sights. Because i spent my 25 years with Turks on Turkiye.

So the answer is no.

You have no evidence besides just a few people you've met in your lifetime.

So, you, give me statistical evidence to prove that the general opnion of Turks is "not" to be the policing force across the Islamic sphere…

Sorry mate. The burden of proof is on you.

You claim something? You have to prove it.

If someone sympathise with other one, he would naturally want other not to be hurt and he would naturaly want to protect other. And if someone’s prophet teached him that “Someone who is sleeping satiated while his neighbour suffers owing to hunger,isn’t at our side”, he would naturally say my words.

But that doesn't mean that a nation would send military forces into another nation to protect them. You've presented examples of Muslims in conflict, and thus far Turkey have never taken significant military action to protect them.

I hadt this preveb ranslated to my frind. “calling a bear as an uncle till you pass over the river.” I hope it will make sense to you.

Sorry, it doesn't.

by **jkop** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:28 am

Lando_Griffin wrote:

This poor b*stard fell asleep reading this thread.

During his slumber, he has missed His Daughter's birth, her first step, her first day at school, her first date, her first boyfriend, and her wedding.

He briefly woke to see his Granddaughter's birth, caught a glimpse of this again, and instantly blacked out.

His Granddaughter is now 17, pregnant with her 7th child, and a crack-whore.

All becasue of this thread.

by **Woollyback** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:29 am

saw this on an email today, thought any daily mail readers out there might like it :laugh:

A Lady wrote a lot of letters to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive insurgent (terrorist) being held in Guantanamo Bay. She received back the following reply:

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington,D.C.20016

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of the Taleban and Al Qaeda detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington.

You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care.

Your personal detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant care-takers.

We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing
these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group.

He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually), since he views females as a sub-human form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies
around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will, over time, come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka.

Just remember that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his religious beliefs" -- wasn't that how you put it?

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good care of Ahmed - and remember, we'll be watching.

Good luck!

Cordially, your friend,

Don Rumsfeld

by **metalhead** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:06 am

Woollyback wrote:saw this on an email today, thought any daily mail readers out there might like it

A Lady wrote a lot of letters to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive insurgent (terrorist) being held in Guantanamo Bay. She received back the following reply:

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington,D.C.20016

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of the Taleban and Al Qaeda detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington.

You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care.

Your personal detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant care-takers.

We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing
these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group.

He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually), since he views females as a sub-human form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies
around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will, over time, come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka.

Just remember that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his religious beliefs" -- wasn't that how you put it?

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good care of Ahmed - and remember, we'll be watching.

Good luck!

Cordially, your friend,

Don Rumsfeld

lol!!!

by **Lando_Griffin** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:24 am

Woollyback wrote:saw this on an email today, thought any daily mail readers out there might like it

A Lady wrote a lot of letters to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive insurgent (terrorist) being held in Guantanamo Bay. She received back the following reply:

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington,D.C.20016

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of the Taleban and Al Qaeda detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington.

You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care.

Your personal detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant care-takers.

We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing
these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group.

He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually), since he views females as a sub-human form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies
around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will, over time, come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka.

Just remember that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his religious beliefs" -- wasn't that how you put it?

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good care of Ahmed - and remember, we'll be watching.

Good luck!

Cordially, your friend,

Don Rumsfeld

Brilliant!!!!!

by **Judge** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:22 am

I was in a hotel when the security forces broke in with smoke canisters, guns the lot. I was terrified. I was pushed to the floor and asked where he was. I said who? They said Bin Laden was in the room, and i was hatching a plan of destruction with him.

I said you fucking idiots, i only rang down to the hotel reception to ask for my BED LINEN to be changed.

fuckin echelon computer

by **66-1112520797** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:25 am

Judge wrote:I was in a hotel when the security forces broke in with smoke canisters, guns the lot. I was terrified. I was pushed to the floor and asked where he was. I said who? They said Bin Laden was in the room, and i was hatching a plan of destruction with him.

I said you fucking idiots, i only rang down to the hotel reception to ask for my BED LINEN to be changed.

fuckin echelon computer

by **Ciggy** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:22 am

Woollyback wrote:saw this on an email today, thought any daily mail readers out there might like it

A Lady wrote a lot of letters to the White House complaining about the treatment of a captive insurgent (terrorist) being held in Guantanamo Bay. She received back the following reply:

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington,D.C.20016

Dear Concerned Citizen,

Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of the Taleban and Al Qaeda detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington.

You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers" program, or LARK for short.

In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided to place one terrorist under your personal care.

Your personal detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday. Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some assistant care-takers.

We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended in your letter.

Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his "attitudinal problem" will help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing
these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling.

Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills at your next yoga group.

He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this might offend him.

Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except sexually), since he views females as a sub-human form of property. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known to show violent tendencies
around women who fail to comply with the new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will, over time, come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka.

Just remember that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his religious beliefs" -- wasn't that how you put it?

Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good care of Ahmed - and remember, we'll be watching.

Good luck!

Cordially, your friend,

Don Rumsfeld

Brilliant I suggest this letter be sent to all the feckin do gooders out there.

by **metalhead** » Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:48 pm

I don't think bin laden is dead anyways! if he was then I'm sure Al- Zawahiri would have told us he is dead.

by **Fowler_E7** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:07 am

i wonder if there is anyone dangerous in Guantanamo Bay, the answer is probably not.

by **Ciggy** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:49 am

Fowler_E7 wrote:i wonder if there is anyone dangerous in Guantanamo Bay, the answer is probably not.

No they are just enjoying a long holiday in Cuba :glare:

by **Judge** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:23 am

If you get caught with explosives, or explosive materials, found with a weapon, found with videos of terror camp training, martyr bandanas, instructions on how to make bombs and cause death to innocents, or have been watched training in the terror camps then you deserve to be locked up without trial. fuck them

I tell you what, any tit stupid enough to say, let them go, would change their mind if say a suspected terror agent was let out, only for them to blow themselves up outside a school, killing the whole of that whingers family. In fringe their human rights, what a load of bollox.

Terrorists are the worst kind of criminal and they are cowards in war. :angry:

Route out the terror twats and either execute them, or send them to guantanamo

If you agree, then vote for judge when he decides to run for government :cool:

by **Ciggy** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:46 am

Them Taleban kunts and those who call themselves Al Qeada, are in guantanamo for dissgusting acts of violence and terrorism and anyone that says they are not dangerous I ask would you like them free again to comment such crimes against innocent human beings.
Like beheading women and children in a football stadium while by standers cheer them on.
Hang women because they didnt wear a burkha.
First class kunts of the highest order, my only problem is there is not enough guantanamo's for these b@stards, they should all be sent to a desrt island and shot.

http://www.rawa.org/murder-w.htm

by **Judge** » Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:52 am

ciggy, when i become prime minister i want you as my personal adviser :;):

Liverpool FC Forum

Bin laden

Who is online