Gerrard ignored by the queen again - Barry ferguson, wtf?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby 112-1077774096 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:16 pm

bigmick wrote:To generalise and lump the current Queen or indeed any of her gunfire shy military sons

prince andrew/ falklands     :oops:
112-1077774096
 

Postby Good Bob » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:33 pm

What do they do? Born millionaire's with no personality, sense of perspective or life experience.

They all need to be shot.

Famous for what? They get all the money and freedom in the country for what?

Imagine you meet the queen, you say "Hiya Liz hows it going?" You'd probably get hung, drawn an quartered for that. Its all bollox, they think they're above everyone. They aren't, they're human beings that have massive privilages for no reason, not because they earnt it.

Can you imagine one of them :censored: living on a council estate. Bloody arrogant snobs the lot of them.

Scum of the earth.
Good Bob
 
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 11:34 pm
Location: England

Postby 112-1077774096 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:40 pm

Good Bob wrote:What do they do? Born millionaire's with no personality, sense of perspective or life experience.

They all need to be shot.

Famous for what? They get all the money and freedom in the country for what?

Imagine you meet the queen, you say "Hiya Liz hows it going?" You'd probably get hung, drawn an quartered for that. Its all bollox, they think they're above everyone. They aren't, they're human beings that have massive privilages for no reason, not because they earnt it.

Can you imagine one of them :censored: living on a council estate. Bloody arrogant snobs the lot of them.

Scum of the earth.

is that your wel thought out reply?    :D


yes they get money from the public purse which comes from taxes, but they also work for that money by fulfilling public engagements, sometimes over 500 a year. they also have paid jobs, mainly military (except for edward with his production company). i dont envisge ever seeing them living on a council estate mate as they are all well educated. last week prince andrew was in thaliand for the thai kings celebrations and he was on the news every day, as well as the celebrations he was involved in promoting british business in thailand which will ultimatley bring money into the country. i am sure you are not aware how much money the royals do bring in with tourism but i assume that you dont care about that as you thing it doesnt affect you.

maybe you should turn your attentions to the other people who get  a slice of our taxes, the dole spongers who fulifil no public engagements and do no good for the country whatsoever. you will find plenty of them living on council estates, and not surviving very well
112-1077774096
 

Postby account deleted by request » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:48 pm

neanderthal knuckle dragging idiot


Best insult of the day  :bowdown
made me smile anyway  :D
account deleted by request
 
Posts: 20690
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:11 am

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 3:49 pm

peewee wrote:
Good Bob wrote:What do they do? Born millionaire's with no personality, sense of perspective or life experience.

They all need to be shot.

Famous for what? They get all the money and freedom in the country for what?

Imagine you meet the queen, you say "Hiya Liz hows it going?" You'd probably get hung, drawn an quartered for that. Its all bollox, they think they're above everyone. They aren't, they're human beings that have massive privilages for no reason, not because they earnt it.

Can you imagine one of them :censored: living on a council estate. Bloody arrogant snobs the lot of them.

Scum of the earth.

is that your wel thought out reply?    :D


yes they get money from the public purse which comes from taxes, but they also work for that money by fulfilling public engagements, sometimes over 500 a year. they also have paid jobs, mainly military (except for edward with his production company). i dont envisge ever seeing them living on a council estate mate as they are all well educated. last week prince andrew was in thaliand for the thai kings celebrations and he was on the news every day, as well as the celebrations he was involved in promoting british business in thailand which will ultimatley bring money into the country. i am sure you are not aware how much money the royals do bring in with tourism but i assume that you dont care about that as you thing it doesnt affect you.

maybe you should turn your attentions to the other people who get  a slice of our taxes, the dole spongers who fulifil no public engagements and do no good for the country whatsoever. you will find plenty of them living on council estates, and not surviving very well


Thats a  good post PeeWee, I'm not a lover but nor am I against the monarch. But people dont realise the revenue they bring to the country. A good two thirds of tourists that visit our shores visit for the history and tradition of our country and by doing so the monarch would pull in millions of pounds every year to our economy.
66-1112520797
 

Postby bigmick » Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:31 pm

peewee wrote:i dont envisge ever seeing them living on a council estate mate as they are all well educated.

Hmmmm. Sometimes Peewee mate it's best to leave well alone and put the spade down. It's not compulsary that you keep digging. Being from a council estate myself, well suffice to say that I don't agree with this particular generalisation. All generalisations are generally wrong in my experience and this one is no different.
As to your reference to Prince Andrew visa vis the Falklands as an example of a royal seeing active service, then I can only smile. It's long been my stock answer to the question "what would do if there was conscription again?" to simply reply that as long as I've got a member of the royal family stood next to me I'll get in any tank, stand in any trench, sail on any ship or ride on any helicopter and fight for my country against any fecker you like. Alas, I think that renders me completely safe in any conflict you care to name. Prince Andrew will have been closer than I was in Yorkshire to the sound of gunfire, but only marginally so I would venture.
As a final point I think your views on the monarchy being a better example of a head of state than a Presidency are broadly correct. It is the connundrum of what you replace it with that has kept and will continue to keep the present royal family going for the forseeable.
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby Scottbot » Sun Jun 18, 2006 4:48 pm

Bloody ell! You'd never no it was the off-season would ya?
User avatar
Scottbot
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4919
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Winchester, Hampshire

Postby soprano06 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 5:43 pm

he didnt get an an mbe coz hes not english he's scouse :cool:
soprano06
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:03 pm
Location: liverpool

Postby kazza » Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:48 pm

bigmick wrote:I'm not actually certain that an attack on the Queen represents an attack on Britain as a whole. I've re-read Boodiddy's post and while I can't say I agree with all of it, I don't find myself massively offended either.
He refers to Fergie being a "whisky nose Jock barstard" which with the exception of the deliberately misspelled reference to his parentage is fair enough IMHO. His analysis of the events of the final is just just about spot on aswell, there has not been a team more fortunate to prevail in the European Cup final.
He's presumeably correct and thankfully we can take it as a given about the Queen's nether regions given her age and though I don't agree with the sentiment about the usage of the union jack, it doesn 't bother me unduly that that is his view.
He calls the royals "murdering barstards" and although I disagree with the conspiracy theories about Dianna's death and would make the point that it's a while since there has been any "murdering", there are history books packed full of atrocities throughout the years which have been carried out in the name of the crown. To generalise and lump the current Queen or indeed any of her gunfire shy military sons in with the "murdering Barstards" is stretching the point somewhat but once again, try as I might I just can't get offended.
He finishes his post off with the traditional "huns" retort. I guess he is referring to the fact that the royal family had to change their name from Battenburg to Windsor before the First World War as it was felt by the powers that be that the silly working class people might just get the hump about their teenage sons being mown down in their thousands in some strategically inconsequential French field in the name of a family which was actually from the same place as the people they were fighting against.
You know what? I'm no royalist either but even if I was I wouldn't find this stuff offensive. Maybe we shouldn't take each other too seriously, this is not Question Time on a thursday night it's supposed to be a football forum. Nobody dislikes racism more than me but we shouldn't go hunting for it where it doesn't exist, it just gets boring.
FWIW and as a footnote, I don't think that Steven Gerrard as a 26 year old extremely well paid footballer deserves any recognition in terms of honours at this stage of his career. In time, probably but not now. I'm even more certain that he doesn't give a sh!te either way and frankly neither do I.

You say you don't give a sh1t but you write a book (sorry post) on the subject.

Trouble is I read your long post at the end of the day and about half way through my brain switches off and I start thinking of fishing. Mick mate, sometimes more is less.   :)



Stu let it go. You are a bitter b@stard.

Boodiddy it is about the reference to the Union Jack. Not what an Englishman would do. Regardless of his social stature.
User avatar
kazza
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6571
Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Spread thin

Postby RUSHIE#9 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:55 pm

And for tomorrow's topic of the day - WASTED BILLIONS ON NHS IT SYSTEM :D . If it's gonna start gettin into political shite on here i'll see ya in August when footie season starts again. :laugh:
User avatar
RUSHIE#9
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 3694
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:25 pm

Postby 66-1112520797 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:29 pm

RUSHIE#9 wrote:And for tomorrow's topic of the day - WASTED BILLIONS ON NHS IT SYSTEM :D . If it's gonna start gettin into political shite on here i'll see ya in August when footie season starts again. :laugh:

:laugh:  :laugh:     :laugh:
66-1112520797
 

Postby bigmick » Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:48 pm

kazza wrote:Mick mate, sometimes more is less.   :)

Fair enough Kaz. I must admit I do spout some b0ll0cks sometimes but no harm to you or anyone else who disagrees with it. Sorry for going on anyhow   :)
"se e in una bottigla ed e bianco, e latte".
User avatar
bigmick
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 12166
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: Wimbledon, London.

Postby 112-1077774096 » Sun Jun 18, 2006 11:54 pm

bigmick wrote:
peewee wrote:i dont envisge ever seeing them living on a council estate mate as they are all well educated.

Hmmmm. Sometimes Peewee mate it's best to leave well alone and put the spade down. It's not compulsary that you keep digging. Being from a council estate myself, well suffice to say that I don't agree with this particular generalisation. All generalisations are generally wrong in my experience and this one is no different.
As to your reference to Prince Andrew visa vis the Falklands as an example of a royal seeing active service, then I can only smile. It's long been my stock answer to the question "what would do if there was conscription again?" to simply reply that as long as I've got a member of the royal family stood next to me I'll get in any tank, stand in any trench, sail on any ship or ride on any helicopter and fight for my country against any fecker you like. Alas, I think that renders me completely safe in any conflict you care to name. Prince Andrew will have been closer than I was in Yorkshire to the sound of gunfire, but only marginally so I would venture.
As a final point I think your views on the monarchy being a better example of a head of state than a Presidency are broadly correct. It is the connundrum of what you replace it with that has kept and will continue to keep the present royal family going for the forseeable.

mick, i appreciate that you live on a council estate, but you should also be aware that i did not bring council estates into the discusion, i also wonder why you did not choose to ask bob why he brought them into the discussion with his insinuation that council estates must be bad places to live and people will struggle to live there. is that your view also? is your life one big struggle and you have to be a special type of person to live there?

also i think flying a sea king from hms invicnible while argentinian fighters are attacking ships, planes and helicopters, also hovering over those attacked ships to rescue men, also rescue men for the mainland should not be trivialised. he was given no special treatement or maybe his helicopter had a special shield like on star treck to make him safe. (sarcasm)


ok and to clear it up, i am not royalist. but i do believe the royals do more good for the country than bad
112-1077774096
 

Postby drummerphil » Mon Jun 19, 2006 12:23 am

RUSHIE#9 wrote:And for tomorrow's topic of the day - WASTED BILLIONS ON NHS IT SYSTEM :D . If it's gonna start gettin into political shite on here i'll see ya in August when footie season starts again. :laugh:

oooooooo  I cant wait to get my teeth into that one,but i fear radiotherapy has fecked them up.......oh well
Image
my reason for living

   
Image





Bob Paisley : "Still we've had the hard times too - one year we finished second."

...
User avatar
drummerphil
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4864
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 7:13 pm
Location: on a cloud

Postby laza » Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:10 am

peewee wrote:also i think flying a sea king from hms invicnible while argentinian fighters are attacking ships, planes and helicopters, also hovering over those attacked ships to rescue men, also rescue men for the mainland should not be trivialised. he was given no special treatement or maybe his helicopter had a special shield like on star treck to make him safe. (sarcasm)


ok and to clear it up, i am not royalist. but i do believe the royals do more good for the country than bad

Well bloody said
Im not fan of royal family but to denigrate someone's service in a conflict, because it didnt match the original snidey generalisation of royals. Does a disservice not just to him but to everyone else that had  served.

Totally agree with Rushie also, people getting their knickers in a knot over LFC TV articles being posted here and usual anti newbie bleating .
I rather that any day to where this thread has gone
Forever Red in this life and the next
User avatar
laza
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8408
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am
Location: The Sharkbait captial of the world

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 84 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e