Worst signing

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Worst signing

Kippe
1
5%
Diomede
1
5%
Dundee
3
14%
Diouf
0
No votes
Ferri
2
9%
Traore
1
5%
Biscan
7
32%
Diao
3
14%
Diouf
3
14%
Xavier
1
5%
 
Total votes : 22

Postby stapo1000 » Thu May 13, 2004 10:32 pm

THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE NOMINATION- BISCAN
Steve Gerrard Gerrard,
He'll pass the ball 40 yards,
He's quick and he's f*cking hard,
Steve Gerrard Gerrard.
User avatar
stapo1000
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: Athlone, Co. Westmeath

Postby Eazy-E » Thu May 13, 2004 10:42 pm

Diouf he is a faggot who does'nt play with pride nor passion, he is a DISGRACE and a lowlife :p
''I kick :censored: and i take names. You're in my pocket. Shut your mouth. Rest your gums. I own you bitch.''
User avatar
Eazy-E
 
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 12:03 am
Location: Ireland

Postby stapo1000 » Thu May 13, 2004 10:45 pm

diouf is just a player who doesn't have pride in a jersey he is priveliged to wear
Steve Gerrard Gerrard,
He'll pass the ball 40 yards,
He's quick and he's f*cking hard,
Steve Gerrard Gerrard.
User avatar
stapo1000
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: Athlone, Co. Westmeath

Postby THEBARON » Thu May 13, 2004 10:51 pm

And he disgraced the famous red shirt with his antics in Glasgow last year !
User avatar
THEBARON
 
Posts: 423
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2003 8:21 pm

Postby woof woof ! » Thu May 13, 2004 10:58 pm

THEBARON wrote:And he disgraced the famous red shirt with his antics in Glasgow last year !

Get over it  :p
Image

Image
User avatar
woof woof !
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 21225
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:22 am
Location: Here There and Everywhere

Postby Dalglish » Tue Jun 15, 2004 1:33 am

Dundee was unbelievably bad. He was  deceptive....he was SLOWER than he looked :D

Recent signings have clouded our judgements but its a sad state of affairs when we have so many to choose from !!! ???
Image
User avatar
Dalglish
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 4678
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 1:08 am
Location: Liverpool

Postby azriahmad » Tue Jun 15, 2004 3:33 am

If the criteria was based on purely playing performance, to my mind it has to be Biscan because he was utterly rubbish yet he gets to play with annoying regularity. however, if you factor the transfer price into consideration, then it has to be Diouf who is plainly awful for even a fraction of what he cost us.

Just look at Man City's Anelka for what could have been...he managed to score so many goals playing for such a poor team.
User avatar
azriahmad
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 6:10 pm

Postby chiggz_likes_owen » Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:55 pm

How do we know Biscan sucks, what if he does amazing in his real position [Defensive Midfielder] ???
Image
User avatar
chiggz_likes_owen
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1645
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:04 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby azriahmad » Wed Jun 16, 2004 5:15 am

Ideally, a defensive midfielder is one who can read the game, make and win crucial tackles, intercept the opposition pases and pass the ball well to start the counter-attacks. Pace is a secondary imortance, although it helps to make the defensive midfielder more complete.

I may be biased against him but on the evidence of his run in the team, Biscan does not have enough of these qualities and it is a wonder what Houllier see in him to splash out 5.5 million and after that never played him in his natural position.
User avatar
azriahmad
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 6:10 pm

Previous

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], leeroy74 and 82 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e