banana wrote:Of course Hyypia would have been an important player if he had been available. But if Agger hadn't been cup tied this wouldn't have been an issue. The position we really suck in is striker/forward. Letting Baros go was not a mistake. But letting him go WITHOUT a replacement who is AT LEAST as good as Baros was a HUGE mistake. FWIW I never thought Baros was a world beater, but he was a good striker with pace, power and intelligence. Not to forget a wonderful work rate. He chased the defenders like a mad dog. Compare it to Crouch and Morientes. They NEVER threathe the defenders or put pressure on them or close them down. NEVER. If we had Etoo, Shevshenko or Henry we would have been celebrating now. Heck. If we had Hasselbaink, Baros, Ashton, Jason Roberts, Bent, Bellam and so on and so on we would have been celebrating.
You see, this is what Stu is talking about.
I thought you always maintained that Hyppia was passed it and a liability?
More to the point, if you think Baros was/is an "intelligent" player then surely your only excuse aside from temporary insanity brought on by the sudden and unexpected appearance of a full moon is that maybe you were reared on a diet of Lacross or Shinty as a child.
Either that or you were breast fed to the age of 8.