
Its been two weeks in a row and they have been fantastic interviews (i just read how robbie phoned ian rush straight away to say how happy he was.)
I also asked a few member on here about there take on this in PMS and it seemed like it might just be a grab and smash ploy by the journalists, but now i know this isnt the case. ian rush is actually talking to the s*n. i cant even spell the word, that hows much i dislike the paper. dislike is not a strong wnough word but i dont wanna see

so heres my problem, should i even be reading the article? id never buy the paper but its ian rush for fecks sake. is he trying to build a bridge that should never be brought?
im sorry to dedicate a thread to this sh!t paper, but its about the articles and i really do feel guilty about even reading it (and i had a quick glance at page 3..sorry)