Liverpool FC Forum

by **stmichael** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:06 pm

i'm not worried about this game at all if i'm perfectly honest. i'm more worried about betis and man city.

3-0 win on saturday. :buttrock

by **AlanHansen** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:57 pm

I think we should play Moro and Cisse, they both scored in the break and if they're on a roll then keep them on it.

Team

Reina
Finnan Carra Hyypia Warnock
Pongo Hamann Alonso Zenden
Cisse Moro

2-0 to us.

by **Ace Ventura** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:10 pm

AlanHansen wrote:I think we should play Moro and Cisse, they both scored in the break and if they're on a roll then keep them on it.

Team

Reina
Finnan Carra Hyypia Warnock
Pongo Hamann Alonso Zenden
Cisse Moro

2-0 to us.

No Gerrard then ?

by **Effes** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:23 pm

I think it should be Morientes and Cisse up front too.
I've got this feeling that Moro will be knocking them in soon, just a matter of time.
I think Gerrard should be deployed on the right too.
Warnock should get the nod ahead of Derjimi everytime IMO.

by **115-1073096938** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:20 pm

All you lot have been doing is banging on about how need a settled team this season and now we have one you want to change it?

:no

Whats the point in changing something dramatically if its not broke? Sissoko's been poor as of late, so he's the only player i'd consider changing. If Riise is injured then it MUST be Warnock and not the clown. If the clown plays we WILL conceed.

by **Ciggy** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:46 pm

stu_the_red wrote:All you lot have been doing is banging on about how need a settled team this season and now we have one you want to change it?

Whats the point in changing something dramatically if its not broke?

No one wants to change the team but if Xabi is tired, and Luis and Riise are injured then they have to be replaced. Do they not?

by **MilitiaRusher** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:47 pm

I would start with:

Reina

Finnan Carragher Hyypia Riise

Gerrard Sissoko Hamann Zenden

Crouch Cisse

SUBS: Carson, Morientes, Alonso, Kewell, Garcia.

by **andy_g** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 2:56 pm

inconsistency is a terrible thing. we should start rotating some of the members of this forum... :;):

by **Sabre** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:01 pm

While I'd consider to keep in the bench Luis Garcia (1) I'd put Morientes to play. He did a good job in Slovaquia. Not talking about the assist, but the team work he did holding the ball, while our wingers progressed. Very important. The more he plays, the better he does. He needs minutes, and we need his minutes.

Sabre

(1) Reason 1) He had little pain in the heel 2) He's going to play important CL matches 3) He's been playing lots of games

by **Ciggy** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:03 pm

Sabre wrote:(1) Reason 1) He had little pain in the heel 2) He's going to play important CL matches 3) He's been playing lots of games

Sabre what was Garcia's injury? cant find nothing on the news here.

by **Sabre** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:11 pm

ONe of the most bloody tricky things to translate are bloody injuries. :angry:

.

Not that he was injured. He was, as we say here, "touched". He had some little pain in the Achiles heel (I don't know how you call that). It's quite common to have some troubles in some sinews along the season, and many times players play under this circumstances. If you break the so called "Achiles heel sinew", you have one of the trickiest injury you can have in that zone. 4-6 months. So if you feel little pain, you'd rather stop to make the sinew rest.

I really hope to have made some sense up there, in some aspects of your language, I'm very constrained.

Sabre

by **84-1106852058** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:12 pm

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:
Sabre wrote:(1) Reason 1) He had little pain in the heel 2) He's going to play important CL matches 3) He's been playing lots of games

Sabre what was Garcia's injury? cant find nothing on the news here.

Howdy ciggy,I am sure I read it was an injury to his heel,nothing to be concerned about expected to be fit for Saturday.

by **Ciggy** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:13 pm

Sabre wrote:ONe of the most bloody tricky things to translate are bloody injuries. .

Not that he was injured. He was, as we say here, "touched". He had some little pain in the Achiles heel (I don't know how you call that). It's quite common to have some troubles in some sinews along the season, and many times players play under this circumstances. If you break the so called "Achiles heel sinew", you have one of the trickiest injury you can have in that zone. 4-6 months. So if you feel little pain, you'd rather stop to make the sinew rest.

I really hope to have made some sense up there, in some aspects of your language, I'm very constrained.

Sabre

Thanx sabre and for what its worth your english is better than mine and 1234 Spams

by **Ace Ventura** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:17 pm

Sabre wrote:ONe of the most bloody tricky things to translate are bloody injuries. .

Not that he was injured. He was, as we say here, "touched". He had some little pain in the Achiles heel (I don't know how you call that). It's quite common to have some troubles in some sinews along the season, and many times players play under this circumstances. If you break the so called "Achiles heel sinew", you have one of the trickiest injury you can have in that zone. 4-6 months. So if you feel little pain, you'd rather stop to make the sinew rest.

I really hope to have made some sense up there, in some aspects of your language, I'm very constrained.

Sabre

Thats a pretty good medical report sabre...and to do it in a foreign language is very impressive.

Luis was sub in the second leg, which should probably mean that its nothing much and that he will be fit for sat.

I read somewhere that Rafa had requested Luis not be started in the second leg to give him the rest...cant remember where or if its true but it would make sense with him being on the bench still....if he was genuinely injured they probably wouldnt of bothered making him travel to slovakia.

by **Sabre** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 3:22 pm

He was match fit, but we do have consideration towards the teams that provides us players; that debate was longly discussed here, and since then, Spanish Squad tries not to be agains the interests of the clubs unless it's necessary. Since we were qualified, we wouldn't put in Risk LG heel.

That's why recently Madrid had troubles with Beckham after the game he was sent off. Beckham wanted to be with the squad to make "group", to support them as he is the captain. But Madrid understood that since he couldn't play, he should return to the club at once. In this case I understand Real Madrid, as I'd understand a Liverpool fan that would complain if LG takes risks if not necessary.

Sabre

Liverpool FC Forum

Liverpool v portsmouth

Who is online