Kewells embarressing

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Starbridge42 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 1:06 pm

Ciggy I dont think it took him 10 months to decide to sue Lineker, I think thats the court process.  My dad's a supreme court judge and my mum's a magistrate.  On multiple occasions cases have started as much as 4 YEARS after the complaint was lodged.
I didn't like Italy, it was like living in a foreign country - Ian Rush
'In most associations half of the committee does all the work while the other half does nothing. I am pleased to report that in this football club it is the reverse.' - Liverpool Echo
User avatar
Starbridge42
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 11:50 am
Location: The land of pixies and and elephants and little green men with purple boogers. Wow I must have eaten

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:57 pm

Fowler_E7 wrote:if any other Liverpool player had an identical court case i can guarantee that not a single person would be complaining, in fact we would all probably be supporting him, but becaue it's Harry Kewell every one gets on his back and hurls abuse. Like every other fan i have seen some truely woeful performances by Kewell this year and for me he has been nothing short of a discrace but to use this court case agianst him (which he doe not control the timing or length of) is simply out of order IMO. I mean if this case came to media attention over a year ago, funny how it's only brought up now that Kewell is figure of hate amongst supporters.

Spot on.

Leave the lads personal life out of it.

He's not doing anything wrong. He deserves slating for his shocking performances and pathetic effort levels, but not this. Any excuse to have a go, we're meant to be better fans than this aswell.
115-1073096938
 

Postby Belfastred » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:27 pm

stu_the_red wrote:Leave the lads personal life out of it.

He's not doing anything wrong. He deserves slating for his shocking performances and pathetic effort levels, but not this. Any excuse to have a go, we're meant to be better fans than this aswell.

Fair enough

But for me kewell genuinely lacks integrity in his professional life and this is reflected in his personal life.

I would love to see Kewell do well for us, I know there is a good player in there somewhere, but I cant see it happening for him. I maybe proved wrong but we will wait and see.
User avatar
Belfastred
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:20 pm

Postby 115-1073096938 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:32 pm

I'm all for gettin shut. His performances have been an absoloute disgrace. No excuses he's been a joke with a pathetic and discusting attitude. So much so i want to smash his :censored: face in for robbing this club of the money he's had out of it.

But the fact is, i hate his guts for footballing reasons, not because he's sueing someone for slander. Anything else he gets upto doesn't interest me in the slightest aslong as its legal, the fact that his football and attitude has been sickening thought is a different story.
115-1073096938
 

Postby Belfastred » Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:42 pm

stu_the_red wrote:I'm all for gettin shut. His performances have been an absoloute disgrace. No excuses he's been a joke with a pathetic and discusting attitude. So much so i want to smash his :censored: face in for robbing this club of the money he's had out of it.

But the fact is, i hate his guts for footballing reasons, not because he's sueing someone for slander. Anything else he gets upto doesn't interest me in the slightest aslong as its legal, the fact that his football and attitude has been sickening thought is a different story.

As I said in an earlier post, I dont really care about the court case cause the outcome will mean nothing to me in the end. I dont think ive ever been as disapointed by a player as i have with kewell. Some moves dont work out from time to time, but this guy doesnt seem to have the desire to change anything.

70k a week could be spent on two decent players, and I suspect if we do get rid of him there will be a payoff somewhere along the line.
User avatar
Belfastred
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:20 pm

Postby Galactico » Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:38 pm

Personally i've been dead against Kewell as his motives are simple: The big clashes... he's fit the grittier ...less appealing games he's injured???
However the court case is simply bad timing but i am of the opinion that he's right and more importantly along as he's wearing a red shirt we should support him??
After the euro victory i was of the opinion to sell the g*t although until recently i do genuinely believe he's trying to wisen up get himself fully sorted and be ready for next season. In all honesty if he can play up to half the standard we know he's capable of  He'll potentially save us millions in a replacement- BUT this has to be seen admitedly
Galactico
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:25 am

Postby 65-1114725958 » Fri Jun 10, 2005 11:02 pm

This is silly, Kewell just ought to get his so-called form sorted outm instead of dragging LFC's name through the court.

His Agent DID juice leeds for 2m squid, for all to see!

Harry, I don't like you you surfing t"sser, cause you are cr*p.

You gonna take me to court for that?

People want to sell baros after his first full season, but Harrys still on the books, with his 15m of Fans cash over 5 years.
65-1114725958
 

Postby laza » Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:31 am

Alfonso Alonso 1 wrote:People want to sell baros after his first full season, but Harrys still on the books, with his 15m of Fans cash over 5 years.

mate i know you dont want the Pool to sell Baros and its very trendy to be a Kewell slater at the moment but thats  a pretty long and inaccurate bow your drawing with that comment
Forever Red in this life and the next
User avatar
laza
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 8408
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 11:17 am
Location: The Sharkbait captial of the world

Postby The Manhattan Project » Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:05 am

He should put his efforts into becoming a player worthy of wearing the LFC shirt, rather than whining and complaining in court about Lineker who was ten-times the player Kewell is.
china syndrome 80512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 5918 identification unknown 113
source transmission 421 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 001505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 01044 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave
User avatar
The Manhattan Project
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 5416
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 7:22 am
Location: Reactor Number Four

Postby Starbridge42 » Sat Jun 11, 2005 5:15 am

I dot think the court case is about who was the better player.  In fact as far as i can see the comment that caused offence had nothing to do with Harry's abilities or commit as a player.  It was accusing him of knowingly cheating.  The FA investigates managers who claim that the referee or players of the opposing team have cheated in a particular match.  This is the same sort of thing, this case has zilch to do with football.  Just because he is a footballer does not make Harry inelligible to protect his name if he believes he has been defamed, nor does it make him inelligible for due process in the courts. 
He's a waste of time, space and money as a player but that has nothing to do with this case so stop trying to make a connection and leave him to do what he will in his personal life.
I didn't like Italy, it was like living in a foreign country - Ian Rush
'In most associations half of the committee does all the work while the other half does nothing. I am pleased to report that in this football club it is the reverse.' - Liverpool Echo
User avatar
Starbridge42
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1576
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2004 11:50 am
Location: The land of pixies and and elephants and little green men with purple boogers. Wow I must have eaten

Previous

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 68 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e