Liverpool FC Forum

greenred wrote:Your wrong Leon.If you accept the principal that outsiders arent welcome at anfield than you are making a very couragous stance.Im just wondering if you can extend your position to banning outsiders from working in Liverpool? Not enough seats in anfield,not enough jobs in Liverpool.It would seem logical if you hold one of those opinions than you should hold both.

Greenred mate, you have got me wrong here.

My only point on this thread is that it is unfair of established members of this forum to gang up on a new member for having a different opinion to "the norm".

I did not say I agreed with his opinion, I am simply defending his right to have an opinion, wether it be mine or not.

However on your point, I have said a million times, I have no problem with people from the moon supporting Liverpool. What I have in the past had a problem with, and what I dispute on here, is the validity of members comments who do not attend the game, but I do not question their right to have a view or support the team.

Leonmc0708 wrote:

greenred wrote:Your wrong Leon.If you accept the principal that outsiders arent welcome at anfield than you are making a very couragous stance.Im just wondering if you can extend your position to banning outsiders from working in Liverpool? Not enough seats in anfield,not enough jobs in Liverpool.It would seem logical if you hold one of those opinions than you should hold both.

Greenred mate, you have got me wrong here.

My only point on this thread is that it is unfair of established members of this forum to gang up on a new member for having a different opinion to "the norm".

I did not say I agreed with his opinion, I am simply defending his right to have an opinion, wether it be mine or not.

However on your point, I have said a million times, I have no problem with people from the moon supporting Liverpool. What I have in the past had a problem with, and what I dispute on here, is the validity of members comments who do not attend the game, but I do not question their right to have a view or support the team.

same old, same old bollllllocks.

I would rather be a wool than a manc

murphy0151 wrote:

Leonmc0708 wrote:

greenred wrote:Your wrong Leon.If you accept the principal that outsiders arent welcome at anfield than you are making a very couragous stance.Im just wondering if you can extend your position to banning outsiders from working in Liverpool? Not enough seats in anfield,not enough jobs in Liverpool.It would seem logical if you hold one of those opinions than you should hold both.

Greenred mate, you have got me wrong here.

My only point on this thread is that it is unfair of established members of this forum to gang up on a new member for having a different opinion to "the norm".

I did not say I agreed with his opinion, I am simply defending his right to have an opinion, wether it be mine or not.

However on your point, I have said a million times, I have no problem with people from the moon supporting Liverpool. What I have in the past had a problem with, and what I dispute on here, is the validity of members comments who do not attend the game, but I do not question their right to have a view or support the team.

same old, same old bollllllocks.

I would rather be a wool than a manc

Your in high spirits this morning Murf, good night at work lad ?

Leonmc0708 wrote:

murphy0151 wrote:

Leonmc0708 wrote:

greenred wrote:Your wrong Leon.If you accept the principal that outsiders arent welcome at anfield than you are making a very couragous stance.Im just wondering if you can extend your position to banning outsiders from working in Liverpool? Not enough seats in anfield,not enough jobs in Liverpool.It would seem logical if you hold one of those opinions than you should hold both.

Greenred mate, you have got me wrong here.

My only point on this thread is that it is unfair of established members of this forum to gang up on a new member for having a different opinion to "the norm".

I did not say I agreed with his opinion, I am simply defending his right to have an opinion, wether it be mine or not.

However on your point, I have said a million times, I have no problem with people from the moon supporting Liverpool. What I have in the past had a problem with, and what I dispute on here, is the validity of members comments who do not attend the game, but I do not question their right to have a view or support the team.

same old, same old bollllllocks.

I would rather be a wool than a manc

Your in high spirits this morning Murf, good night at work lad ?

Yep, smashing time sir.  Thanks for asking old chap. 


Combine Harvester for sale 10 months old, want quick sale.  Offers plz

Leonmc0708 wrote:

Woollyback wrote:

Leonmc0708 wrote:Jesus Christ, what the feck is going on here.

This is a new member, with a different view to yourselves and everyone is jumping on the bandwagon baiting, taking the michael and ganging up.

Forget about the clique and welcome new members, whatever their views.

BANG Out of order there people.

Leon, this particular newbie deserved all the sh*t he got (and continues to get). Hence the lack of warm welcome.

So no, NOT bang out of order. If you come on here dishing out cr*p, expect to get it back with interest.

Why does he deserve it?

Did he racially abuse someone?

Did he slur our supporters on the Hillsborough tradgedy?

Did he kill someone?

No, No and No again.

He simply expressed his opinion, then had the town halls to stick by his guns instead of joining the herd of backslapping sheep on here with a collective opinion.

I applaud the lad.

Leon mate, diaponeer annoyed a lot of people here with his ooter comments, fair enough, which is his opinion, fair enough, but he has spent most of his posts on that one single issue, forcing it down people's neck.

Raising the issue is ok and it was debated, but diaponeer got on his soap box yesterday and the day before replying to every thread by saying "Support your local team" and calling people Mancs. It got tiresome and boring: he wasn't content in making his point and then moving on, instead he just kept saying it and saying it, to the point that it got extremely irritating.

He also made some really stupid remarks about the club and team which shows that despite his claim that he goes to all the home games as a result of his job as a steward, he has no understanding of the game whatsoever.

Maybe there was a bit of an initial over reaction to diaponeer's initial posts and people took his comments as being racist (they were ignorant, but not in my opinion racist) but diaponeer just kept bleating on about it, which annoyed people.

Last night diaponeer just started being abusive to members in general, and he got abuse back, but he deserved every single bit of what he got.

He has come on to the forum not to give his opinion and engage in intelligent debate, but to try to force his uninformed and misguided opinions down people's throats, and worst of all, simply looking for attention like a big child.

I think Leon by saying that you applaud him has less to do with diaponeer and more to do with your opinions of existing members, am I right? 

maximus wrote:IMO, Leon is looking for a new job as a website moderator 

Or as a steward at LFC .   

murphy0151 wrote:Combine Harvester for sale 10 months old, want quick sale.  Offers plz

Swop yaz for some Sergio Tacchini trackie bottoms & Fred Perry striped jumper? 

Leonmc0708 wrote:Leon, this particular newbie deserved all the sh*t he got (and continues to get). Hence the lack of warm welcome.

So no, NOT bang out of order. If you come on here dishing out cr*p, expect to get it back with interest.

Why does he deserve it?

Did he racially abuse someone?

Did he slur our supporters on the Hillsborough tradgedy?

Did he kill someone?

No, No and No again.

He simply expressed his opinion, then had the town halls to stick by his guns instead of joining the herd of backslapping sheep on here with a collective opinion.

I applaud the lad.[/quote]
Leon, you misinterpret (deliberately I suspect) what has been going on with dapioneer. I fully support his right to come on here and express his opinions (within obvious limits), just as he should support my right to reply to his abrasive comments in a similar fashion. No he hasn't picked particular below-the-belt issues such as Hillsborough or race, but you cannot argue that many of his posts have not been deliberatly abusive to OOTers, myself included. It's water off a duck's back to me and doesn't offend me in the slightest, but he can and should expect to take some flak back himself.

It is not a matter of a clique ganging up on him. He just happens to have a view which irritates a large number of forum members so the abuse he took from several different directions was a product of just that, not a co-ordinated attack on a newbie. Defend him if you like, that's fine by me, but as JBG suggests, I suspect  your motive owes more to sharing some of his opinions rather than a desire to protect free speech

Woollyback wrote:

Leonmc0708 wrote:Leon, this particular newbie deserved all the sh*t he got (and continues to get). Hence the lack of warm welcome.

So no, NOT bang out of order. If you come on here dishing out cr*p, expect to get it back with interest.

Why does he deserve it?

Did he racially abuse someone?

Did he slur our supporters on the Hillsborough tradgedy?

Did he kill someone?

No, No and No again.

He simply expressed his opinion, then had the town halls to stick by his guns instead of joining the herd of backslapping sheep on here with a collective opinion.

I applaud the lad.

Leon, you misinterpret (deliberately I suspect) what has been going on with dapioneer. I fully support his right to come on here and express his opinions (within obvious limits), just as he should support my right to reply to his abrasive comments in a similar fashion. No he hasn't picked particular below-the-belt issues such as Hillsborough or race, but you cannot argue that many of his posts have not been deliberatly abusive to OOTers, myself included. It's water off a duck's back to me and doesn't offend me in the slightest, but he can and should expect to take some flak back himself.

It is not a matter of a clique ganging up on him. He just happens to have a view which irritates a large number of forum members so the abuse he took from several different directions was a product of just that, not a co-ordinated attack on a newbie. Defend him if you like, that's fine by me, but as JBG suggests, I suspect  your motive owes more to sharing some of his opinions rather than a desire to protect free speech[/quote]
thats cos im right. only a few people on here gave me good reasons for not supporting their local team, somebody from new zealand and somebody else.  might as well leave it at that. im in the right

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Yer an Im not a c#nt either 

you're a walton road scally though 

jim_morrison_supported_liverpool wrote:

cisses_gona_get_ya wrote:Yer an Im not a c#nt either 

you're a walton road scally though 

Yer but thats alrite