C-R » Wed Aug 26, 2015 6:32 pm wrote:Some comments from James Pearce of Liverpool Echo in tonight's edition...
Balotelli would walk away from training at the earliest opportunity
Balotelli was found smoking inside the grounds of Melwood
During a bonding exercise Balotelli claimed not to know who Allen was - despite having shared a dressing room with him for months
It would be wrong to say Balotelli was unpopular in the squad. At times he put a smile on his team-mates’ faces with his antics
Full article... http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/fo ... ew-9935471
devaney » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:35 pm wrote:Lee me old mucker it's about as likely to happen as me getting my leg over Candice Swanepoel but we can live in hope
I'm just absolutely fkg delighted that I won't have to see the imature clown poncing around Formby on a very silly looking electric scooter !!!
JC_81 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:01 am wrote:Some fans will express frustration at the money wasted on Balotelli and rightly so, especially when news broke this week he was leaving on loan with us paying a large portion of his wages.
I therefore am not surprised that news also is leaked into the public domain this week in the echo (via the club no doubt) essentially explaining why we let Balotelli leave for nothing. Clearly this is the club trying to justify taking the financial hit. I see it as that rather than a 'hatchet job' on Balotelli. If all that is true then I have no problem with them printing it.
It was a gamble that didn't pay off. Hopefully he has a good season and someone pays a fee for him next summer. We move on.
leeroy74 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 3:37 pm wrote:devaney » Wed Aug 26, 2015 4:35 pm wrote:Lee me old mucker it's about as likely to happen as me getting my leg over Candice Swanepoel but we can live in hope
I'm just absolutely fkg delighted that I won't have to see the imature clown poncing around Formby on a very silly looking electric scooter !!!
ok ok I'm just trying to shine a positive onto it, we still own him so lets hope. I also had to google Candice Swanepoel but I'm glad I did.
ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Thu Aug 27, 2015 1:29 pm wrote:Personally I don't see the need for these negative articles in the local press, just loan him out and leave it at that.
At the end of the day he is still our player and at some point we are going to have to try and recoup as much of our original £16m fee as we possibly can so in that respect articles like this are totally counterproductive.
Fowler_E7 » Thu Aug 27, 2015 1:37 pm wrote:ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Thu Aug 27, 2015 1:29 pm wrote:Personally I don't see the need for these negative articles in the local press, just loan him out and leave it at that.
At the end of the day he is still our player and at some point we are going to have to try and recoup as much of our original £16m fee as we possibly can so in that respect articles like this are totally counterproductive.
Agreed 100% at the end of the day we haven't even sold the guy! hes still on our books so how is posting trash like this gonna help with his resale value?
Reg » Thu Aug 27, 2015 2:06 pm wrote:In this age of full information, transparency, social media and fans demanding to know everything that's going on then explanations are needed. We can't say we need info some of the time and not all the time, that's the way footies gone.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests