Kash_Mountain » Sat Jun 06, 2015 5:32 pm wrote:ycsatbjywtbiastkamb » Jun 6th, '15, 17:56 wrote:It depends how it plays out, if Rodgers has an input to who his new back room team are then it won't be too bad but if it's FSG as FSG alone who are appointing Pascoe's and Marsh successors then I can't see it ending well.
Must admit it doesn't reflect too good on Rodgers that he agreed for his back room team to go but he stays in position himself.
BR will not be getting any say with regards to who is brought in, which begs the question, why not just fire him like Marsh and Pascoe, BR is the main culprit. Maybe there is more then one way to skin a cat, as the saying goes......
FSG will bring in Coaches based on what a certain individual is saying and taking responsibility for making the changes. This person, who will remain nameless, has been taking advice from one specific third party (there has been a number of people involved with the major top down review that has been going on for months and months now), and will have a very good idea and understanding of the direction he wants to take / go.
Plenty more changes will be made, but this may not be seen through games being played / team performances.
Yep certainly think this is what is happening. FSG were better off just removing Rodgers if they are unhappy with things. This whole getting rid of Pascoe and Marsh and effectively pulling the rug from underneath Rodgers, is undignifying for the guy
Also if your a player in the squad and looking at what is happening, you basically see your boss doesn't have full control and is dictated to, it's not a good thing