Positivity VS Negativity

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:43 am

aCe' » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:45 pm wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:54 pm wrote:
aCe' » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:36 pm wrote:Welcome back Stu...

That OP looks like something I'd write after a nice blunt and a couple of Coronas. Not very coherent, but you understand the gist of it. To a large extent, I agree with most of what Stu said. The state of the forum is a bit sad atm especially given the fact that I think its a great time to finally get back to talking footie, tactics, players...etc rather than picking on other posters and their opinions. I know it sounds a bit hypocritical; many here remember the arguments myself, Stu, Mick, Saint, Ciggy, mods..etc had over the years about the exact same 'negativity positivity, real fan, manager mistakes..etc' BS. The difference is, back then both parties -despite everything- put forth some of the best footie discussions this board has seen. Now, every fcking thread seems to be littered with insults aimed at one poster (Benny). Regardless of whether one is right or wrong, surely everyone realizes that it has become boring as fck. The mods have made their stance clear and its a bit pointless ointing it out whenever the fella makes a post.

On a different note and getting back to the topic (I still cant figure out what the topic is to be honest but I'll give it a go), I agree that many of the players we have in the side are average players who arent very likely to get us far in terms of winning the league. With what we have atm, I think we'll need a bit of luck and for Rodgers to make all the right moves (tactically, transfers..etc) to get that 4th spot ahead of Arsenal and Tottenham. Where I dont agree with Stu is the fact that you need 11 top talents on the pitch who are all top players to get to that CL spot. I'm not Henderson's biggest fan, and I agree that he's one of the average players we have. Same with Moses, Aspas, Lucas, Skrtel, Cissokho, etc. However, we do neeed players like Lucas and Henderson to provide that bit of balance and energy to the side in many games.

Again, it all goes back to what our objectives are. For me, a 4th place finish would be an achievement, and probably our goal for the season. For that, I think Lucas in the starting 11 as a player whos primary job is to protect the back4 is good enough. If our objective was winning the league, we'd probably have to look at a better alternative to bring into the starting 11.  A more pressing concern in the starting 11 is that right wing spot. We're currently playing Henderson in the position but he's not someone who is likely to offer you much over 38 games as you put it. Yes, his work rate is good and he'll offer that bit of balance (probably the best option we have unless Moses does a Sturridge and proves to be a gem) but he lacks the creativity and guile needed above and beyond the standard shift that he currently puts in. Another major concern is the lack of a plan B which is largely due to a lack of quality in midfield/forward positions on the bench. It's too early to judge Aspas and Alberto but I have my doubts about both. Funny enough, the area we seemed to struggle with the most (CBs) has suddenly become our strongest in our squad at least in terms of personnel and the quality/options they bring to the table.

Overall for me, theres work to be done but its not as bad as being made out. Top of the league after 3 games means nothing if we can't improve and more importantly build on it. We're 2 players short of having a side that SHOULD get a top4 spot. The squad isn't average and we have some game changers in the side who are yet to play or play to their potential (Suarez, Gerrard, and Coutinho to be exact) so to borrow your line "Fact is, the truth has always been somewhere in the middle" when it comes to our prospects.


Ace, thats the point mate, I don't believe you need 11 world class players. But you do need one or two, and alot of class players aswell as good ones. Liverpool lack the good ones for me mate.

United have good players, as good Chelsea and Arsenal, at Liverpool we've the got the sublime... and dog average. I don't see many dog average players in and around the United, Chelsea and Arsenal line ups, or even Spurs for that matter. I'd even push it and and say Everton have more "good players" than we do... only we have a few top players where they don't (IE Gerrard, Coutinho and Suarez).

With regards to the centre backs though ACE I'm sorry I don't agree. Agger is a good player, but he's not "the answer" so to speak. Toure I'm not overly convinced by, I also have a mate who's a city fan (I have alot of mates these days :D ) and he says he preferes Lescott and Toure is a bit of a liability (at times, something I am a bit wary of myself).

I think defensively we're quite weak. We protect the defence well as a team, tacitcally I think defensively we're good, but I believe the personel isn't upto it. Sahko is a player however I've seen absoloutely nothing of. If he turns out to be the same level of player Sami Hyypia was then we may well be onto something providing we can convince Reina to come back next season :D


I think it might be easier if I do it this way :

Top bracket (game changer, top quality player) :

Suarez
Gerrard

title contender good:

Coutinho
Johnson
Enrique
Sakho (potentially could become one of the best around)

Top4 good:

Sturridge (if he can continue producing as he has since joining)
Agger
Mignolet

Thats 9 players who for me are good enough given our objectives. I'll take it one bit further for you, if Sturridge manages to develop his all round game a bit more especially in terms of movement inside the box and keeping the ball outside it then I think he can break into the higher bracket soon. Agger is great on the ball but he's one of those players who needs to play alongside a top CB imo to elevate his game and gain that extra bit of confidence that seems to take his game to the next level.
With regards to Lucas, he narrowly missed out on the last bracket for me. I know he doesnt tick all the boxes you'd want your CM to have covered but when fit he covers the pitch well and is a bit of specialty player we have in that regard and a major reason behind the 'team as a whole' defending well imo. That said, replacing him wouldnt be as big a priority for me as say bringing in a backup option is.

Back to your point about 'good players' which is an interesting one, I think the likes of Sakho, Johnson, Enrique, Sturridge, and Coutinho (I know you have him higher but he's yet to earn that for me) from our starting 11 all fall in that category imo. Our bench however lacks in that department. Toure (whom I wasn a big fan of but has done well in the first couple of games so I'll give him the benefit of the doubt) is the only player on our bench I'd have on that list which is something I guess we've looked to address by bringing in Aspas (an unknown quantity for me).

We're also disregarding the younger players (Kelly, Sterling, Ibe) who ideally would be going out on loan to get some experience.


The brackets you've put the players in I certainly wouldn't include Johnson, Sturridge or Mingolet.

Mignolet and Sturridge are ok for my money but nothing special, I don't think either would get into Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd or City's team. I think there are alot of players in the same positions in the league that are better than these and the other joker... well... thats for another thread altogether. I refuse to even discuss how poor he is anymore and am just to the blind leading the blind with him.

Sahko for me mate, sorry but he's a none entity till I've seen the lad play... from what I've been told, I'm not expecting much, just kind of hoping he's the answer rather than believing.

I think using your analogy I'd include Gerrard and Suarez as top bracket,

Enrique and Coutinho in the next.

Agger in the next...

Lucas, Mingolet, Toure, Sturridge (maybe Kelly) in the next...

Then the rest in the dog average bunch at best... obviously excluding the lads like Ilori and Sakho I've never seen.
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:45 am

Hustler 2 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:51 pm wrote:Negativity isn't aloud on this forum, and people in here are offended deeply by criticism. Hence the reason why a lot of my negative or critical posts have been removed from various threads.

it seems someone (I wonder who) was upset. :(


Lets be honest... negative or positive...

No-one actually even cares what you say :D
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:50 am

metalhead » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:05 pm wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:29 pm wrote:To start this post, I've noticed the last few days the number of personal attacks on anyone who dares to say anything slightly critical has increased tenfold.

To be honest, the "holly-er than thou" attitude of these posters is just as boring as "sh*te" posted by some other members. To be quite honest, the "happy clappy" approach of the majority seems to have formed into some sort of clique that questions someones support because they don't share the same view. I understand, if someone keeps hammering home there opinion to "make someone agree" it can become tiresome... but the ganging up on other members... who really (from my personal point of view" don't get personal with other posters has just become daft.

I used to get slatted quite alot for having the opinion that if you're from an area, you feel it a little bit more. But not once (so far at least :D ) since coming back to the forum have I used that, or the, you don't go to the game reason as an excuse to have a go at someone.

The reason is quite simple, I TRIED to turn my back on everything for the last few years. I became totally disillusioned with a sport I've played and loved since I was four years old. A sport which provided with an income for a short while and a sport that is loved (even if not understood) by millions.

The money it costs to go to games home and away, europe (if your sides lucky to get there). The way people are so fickle and opinionated on something they have no clue about.

However due to it being such a massive part of my life I found this increasingly impossible... much like an addict who is trying to stay away from drugs, drink or gambling, keep shoving it in their face and they'll probably crack (no pun intended or offence meant to anyone).

I have a friend who trained with Manchester United duing the early 2000's when playing for Bury. We were discussing how good some of the players in the top league are/were and obviously how poor some of the players are. We were talking about the "levels of ability" of players and what makes some players good and some bad and some mediocre and how you can get players in the lower leagues who are better "footballers" than the lads in the premiership but are very average athletes and vice versa and what it takes to compete with better players than yourself and what makes you better than lesser players.

Talking to him and listening to his points got me thinking about the game in more detail than I ever did. I realised that alot of players in the game today don't have the ability level's they are made out to have. Where as some, are so drastically under rated I find it shocking. Having myself played against and with a good number of professionals I started to look at their attributes individually. IE one players touch, one players strength, pace etc and started to compare them to all the other players around the leagues.

Hence the reason there alot of players playing for sides outside the top ten that I think are superb footballers.

Now this leads me onto the thread title. Having looked at these players, (their attributes) and looked at the players signed by LFC over the last few years I don't believe that, me, being positive or negative, will have the slightest effect on the teams performances. I firmly believe that the squad and first XI is lacking in strength and depth and quality. For me, its all well and good to slag someone off when they are down, its great taking the plaudits when they do well. But the thing the great sides all do... is strive for perfection. To take constructive critisism when playing well or getting results is the best time to improve and recieve it. The reasoning is that if you improve you level at its best, its sure to improve your worst performances and over the course of a season, they're the ones that will win you a league title.

What really worries me, is the side has major weaknesses and has rode its luck at times so far. It worries me because I don't believe certain fans can see it and are setting the club up for a fall, and it worries me because I believe a man who is paid millions of pounds a year by the club is also fooled by this and its clouding his judgement.

Yet for some reason, because I'm not going to be lulled int to a false sense of security and think everything is great and rosey... I'm cast as negative, not a fan and blah de blah.

For me, if I didn't care about the club so much, I'd tell you you're all welcome to your average players like Johnson, Lucas, Skrytel and Henderson's of the world and to shove them up your backside... but its the fact I do care and want us to suceed so much that I can't bring myself to be happy about something (being top of the league) that won't last with this clear lack of quality at the club.

What I will say, is that the negativety comes from being able to see a players level of ability. Knowing they aren't good enough, its something that maybe isn't exciting as hoping that they are.


Good post Stu, like all of us we want our club to succeed in the end. You pointed out some constructive criticism which is fair enough in my book and there are a lot of areas that I disagree with you but you do raise some good points regarding player quality, depth etc... I don't think some of the players you mentioned are as bad as you say they are and I do believe players like Skrtel are not good enough for a team that would challenge for top 4 or title. Maybe because we have been battling out for 6th, 7th places the last 3 seasons that average players in our squad has shown better form because there was less pressure on them?

Though, for example, a player like Nani (who you didn't rate in the past) was just shyte the first time he set foot inside Man U, suddenly becomes one of the League's top players for Man U for 2 or 3 seasons running, is it because of ability that was hidden? maturity? or something else? Just a question.


But metalhead... I don't particularly think Nani's a great player still. But he's solid enough and certainly not a bad one. Also he isn't first choice. He can score a goal and set one up and he can effect games. He's third or fourth choice at United, for me he's easily the same level or better than Lucas who is our first choice. The only average player United have in there first eleven is Cleverly. Liverpool have four or five that are of that level.
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:41 am

metalhead » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:12 pm wrote:
RedAnt » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:Seriously Stu, are you just here to start fights? Read the first paragraph and nothing more. Sheesh, the worlds gone soft.


Redant, there is nothing wrong with what he just said, he offered constructive criticism, he might be wrong or he might be right. If you disagree with him just point it out and let's just have a constructive debate.

I enjoy Stu's topics, even If I disagree with it entirely (or agree with half of it), because he knows a lot about the game and it's just interesting to read.


I'm happy to read most things on here, but the style of writing can be very irritating. The opening paragraph dosent encourage good discussion. It says "those who agree, this side of the fence. Those that don't, the other". And of course when I posted that I thought the guy was seeking attention, he got a little more personal.

It's a very naive topic. It's not even about positivity or negativity. Stu is a ranter. He keeps opening ranting threads. I want to talk Liverpool. I don't want to see our hardworking team mocked. The guy even says he's only giving BR one season ffs.

It's possible to be both negative and positive whilst remaining supportive. Calling for our managers head whilst not even waiting to see where our high flying start goes dosent seem supportive to me. But like I say, carry on.
"The S*n: The paper you wipe your ars.e on and more sh*t comes off the paper"
User avatar
RedAnt
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Durham

Postby SouthCoastShankly » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:09 am

StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:45 pm wrote:
Hustler 2 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:51 pm wrote:Negativity isn't aloud on this forum, and people in here are offended deeply by criticism. Hence the reason why a lot of my negative or critical posts have been removed from various threads.

it seems someone (I wonder who) was upset. :(


Lets be honest... negative or positive...

No-one actually even cares what you say :D

The irony...
User avatar
SouthCoastShankly
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 4:36 pm
Location: West Sussex

Postby Kenny Kan » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:20 am

RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:41 am wrote:
metalhead » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:12 pm wrote:
RedAnt » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:Seriously Stu, are you just here to start fights? Read the first paragraph and nothing more. Sheesh, the worlds gone soft.


Redant, there is nothing wrong with what he just said, he offered constructive criticism, he might be wrong or he might be right. If you disagree with him just point it out and let's just have a constructive debate.

I enjoy Stu's topics, even If I disagree with it entirely (or agree with half of it), because he knows a lot about the game and it's just interesting to read.


I'm happy to read most things on here, but the style of writing can be very irritating. The opening paragraph dosent encourage good discussion. It says "those who agree, this side of the fence. Those that don't, the other". And of course when I posted that I thought the guy was seeking attention, he got a little more personal.

It's a very naive topic. It's not even about positivity or negativity. Stu is a ranter. He keeps opening ranting threads. I want to talk Liverpool. I don't want to see our hardworking team mocked. The guy even says he's only giving BR one season ffs.

It's possible to be both negative and positive whilst remaining supportive. Calling for our managers head whilst not even waiting to see where our high flying start goes dosent seem supportive to me. But like I say, carry on.


That's a fair point.

It first starts off about the fallacy of not being able to criticise on this forum.  :upside:
Then it jumps to him making money playing amateur football.  :D
It then meanders onto being addicted to something or other, football I presume.  ???
Then he talks about himself and his mancy mate who plays for a mancy club who between them talk some more.  :p
Ah (ding) he mentions positivity and negativity here when finally talking about how average and s.*i*e our team is.  :D
And finally whinges when he's going to be negative.  :(

It's quite an odd read to follow, I'll give him that.

On the notion of negativity, I think it's okay to be to be critical it encourages debate and constructive criticism is welcome, I think Newkit is one of the best LFC forums for this. And not everybody around here rounds up on people who are negative like the opening paragraph in the opening thread implies. The round up that has been witnessed is because someone thrived, actually got a kick out of winding people up in the best way they could, and as sure as the pope is Catholic the best way to do that on an LFC forum is to come up with all kinds of conspiracies as to why LFC are s.*i*e, once the reaction was NEGATIVE that poster fed off that all summer long. So, on the other hand Stu, you can fark right off bleating about this, you haven't endured the agenda since the posters return. But if you're broadening your observation to that of you and Hustler (who I actually find quite funny), then a word of advice, anymore incoherent threads like this will see you  brothered up with Hustler.  :D
Champions of England 2020.

YNWA
User avatar
Kenny Kan
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 4140
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 10:28 am
Location: Footballing heaven

Postby supersub » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:00 am

Stu is a Walter Mitty character....went to Anfield every week but played semi pro..doesn't figure  re-invented himself as an ace golfer..then got bored and returns as football super pundit...x-factor next
THERE'S A GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL TOMORROW SHINING AT THE END OF EVERY DAY.
THERE'S A GREAT BIG BEAUTIFUL TOMORROW AND TOMORROW IS JUST A DREAM AWAY.
User avatar
supersub
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 7285
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 11:38 pm
Location: knackers yard

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:42 am

SouthCoastShankly » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:09 am wrote:
StuYesThatStu » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:45 pm wrote:
Hustler 2 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:51 pm wrote:Negativity isn't aloud on this forum, and people in here are offended deeply by criticism. Hence the reason why a lot of my negative or critical posts have been removed from various threads.

it seems someone (I wonder who) was upset. :(


Lets be honest... negative or positive...

No-one actually even cares what you say :D

The irony...


So Ironic every thread I start gets at least three pages of reply's.

Have you ever even actually attempted to start a thread? :wwww
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:45 am

I rest my case.
"The S*n: The paper you wipe your ars.e on and more sh*t comes off the paper"
User avatar
RedAnt
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Durham

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:46 am

supersub » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:00 am wrote:Stu is a Walter Mitty character....went to Anfield every week but played semi pro..doesn't figure  re-invented himself as an ace golfer..then got bored and returns as football super pundit...x-factor next


Played semi professionally from 18-19, had a season ticket, sold it on days when I was playing and couldn't get to games, fortunately that wasn't often as Liverpool had ALOT of sunday games back then, definately never said anything about being an "ace golfer"... clearly actually started a thread stating I was struggling with the game... certainly didn't "get bored of it either" and to be quite honest, super pundit?

FFS you actually said on a public Lucas was better than Gerrard... Seriously... :laugh:  :laugh:  :laugh:  :wwww

Just when you think you've heard it all someone comes out with a cracker like that!!!
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:49 am


It first starts off about the fallacy of not being able to criticise on this forum.  :upside:
Then it jumps to him making money playing amateur football.  :D
It then meanders onto being addicted to something or other, football I presume.  ???
Then he talks about himself and his mancy mate who plays for a mancy club who between them talk some more.  :p
Ah (ding) he mentions positivity and negativity here when finally talking about how average and s.*i*e our team is.  :D
And finally whinges when he's going to be negative.  :(

It's quite an odd read to follow, I'll give him that.


Amusing when you put it like that  :laugh:

Apart from my mates not a manc though... :;):
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:50 am



Internet troll alert :wwww
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby Stu the Red » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:07 am

RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:41 am wrote:
metalhead » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:12 pm wrote:
RedAnt » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:27 pm wrote:Seriously Stu, are you just here to start fights? Read the first paragraph and nothing more. Sheesh, the worlds gone soft.


Redant, there is nothing wrong with what he just said, he offered constructive criticism, he might be wrong or he might be right. If you disagree with him just point it out and let's just have a constructive debate.

I enjoy Stu's topics, even If I disagree with it entirely (or agree with half of it), because he knows a lot about the game and it's just interesting to read.


I'm happy to read most things on here, but the style of writing can be very irritating. The opening paragraph dosent encourage good discussion. It says "those who agree, this side of the fence. Those that don't, the other". And of course when I posted that I thought the guy was seeking attention, he got a little more personal.

It's a very naive topic. It's not even about positivity or negativity. Stu is a ranter. He keeps opening ranting threads. I want to talk Liverpool. I don't want to see our hardworking team mocked. The guy even says he's only giving BR one season ffs.

It's possible to be both negative and positive whilst remaining supportive. Calling for our managers head whilst not even waiting to see where our high flying start goes dosent seem supportive to me. But like I say, carry on.


So because you find it irritating you try to derail every thread and start arguements and then put words in peoples mouths?

Whats worse is, even by putting words in my mouth you can't even count past one. :laugh:

I clearly stated I would be happy with Rodgers to be given till the end of next season, that is 3 season in charge Ant. Not 1. :laugh:

And at no point, not ever have I called for a him to be sacked.

As I said in the other thread, get a life, get a bird and stop posting bile. Either contribute to football discussion of f*ck off back to the hole you came from. I'm getting very bored, very quickly of your pointless posts in every f*cking thread about how much of a super fan you are and how much better at posting everyone needs to be and how wonderful everything is and how dare anyone be upset with the lack of quality at the club. If you don't like it, go and post on RAWK, sure they would love another happy clappy snooty little maggot to add to their collection.
Last edited by Stu the Red on Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Stu the Red
LFC Guru Member
 
Posts: 2437
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Postby RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:19 am

StuYesThatStu » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:50 am wrote:


Internet troll alert :wwww


Seen this tactic a lot online.

You confuse me. What is the reason behind your posts? The seasons started and we're doing well. Since you're already analysing what went wrong this season, what would we discuss if it does go ar*e over t*t. How right you were?

I'm not the only one confused by your approach, nor, I'm sure, the only one who's noticed how easily words such as "troll" drip from your fingers.

You seem more interested in getting people to reply to you than adding anything worthwhile, hence having a go at SCS cos he dosent start as many threads as you, nor get three pages of replies. You of course neglect that half of the replies are trying to ascertain what you're on about.

Your manners are terrible. I can't help but feel you should be playing WoW or something.

Just talk football. The transfer window is closed. The squad we have is what we have. So what's the point in asking where we'll finish if all our players are injured? What's the point in asking who we should bring in to improve the squad? January is a long way away in football terms, and a lot can change.

I try to be constructive here too, but how can that be with such irrelevant subject matter?

Still, no need for me to drone on. Enjoy yourself.
User avatar
RedAnt
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Durham

Postby RedAnt » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:21 am

Ahh, f*ck off Stu. You ain't worth the brain cells.
"The S*n: The paper you wipe your ars.e on and more sh*t comes off the paper"
User avatar
RedAnt
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Durham

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e