
Kenny Kan » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:15 pm wrote::D you are a weirdo thommo, it's a good job you're not taken too seriously on here.
Thommo's perm » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:25 pm wrote:Kenny Kan » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:15 pm wrote::D you are a weirdo thommo, it's a good job you're not taken too seriously on here.
According to you Shelvey is a donkey, a duck and a headless chicken
And Im a weirdo?
Daft tw@t
Boxscarf » Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:43 pm wrote:
Aye, but it will be worth it, if it pays off.
This false number 9 only works when you are playing against inferior opposition or when you have a team full of class footballers, we're playing West Ham who tore Chelsea to shreds and were unlucky to lose against Manchester United and we do not have a team full of top class footballers.
Morgan or Yesil to start up front with Sterling next to either player and Shelvey just behind.
------------------Reina-----------------------
Johnson---Agger----Skrtel-----Enrique---
------------Allen------Sahin-----------------
---------------Shelvey--------------------
----Sterling-------------Morgan/Yesil-------
Raoul » Wed Dec 05, 2012 7:43 am wrote:Boxscarf » Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:43 pm wrote:
Aye, but it will be worth it, if it pays off.
This false number 9 only works when you are playing against inferior opposition or when you have a team full of class footballers, we're playing West Ham who tore Chelsea to shreds and were unlucky to lose against Manchester United and we do not have a team full of top class footballers.
Morgan or Yesil to start up front with Sterling next to either player and Shelvey just behind.
------------------Reina-----------------------
Johnson---Agger----Skrtel-----Enrique---
------------Allen------Sahin-----------------
---------------Shelvey--------------------
----Sterling-------------Morgan/Yesil-------
Call me old fashioned, but I'd prefer we start with 11 players.
Kenny Kan » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:20 am wrote:Thommo's perm » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:25 pm wrote:Kenny Kan » Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:15 pm wrote::D you are a weirdo thommo, it's a good job you're not taken too seriously on here.
According to you Shelvey is a donkey, a duck and a headless chicken
And Im a weirdo?
Daft tw@t
i suggest you see a doctor fella, because you clearly have a case of un-diagnosed aspergers which clearly makes your social skilling come across as though you are a weirdo. And until then, you cannot be taken seriously.
Good luck at the quacks :laugh:
Boxscarf » Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:44 pm wrote:
Yes, pardon my stupdity, I haven't learned how to count yet (seemingly), at present I would say that Suarez is irreplaceable.
stmichael » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:28 am wrote:i think it's pretty clear that 4-3-3 isn't working. i think we need to be looking at a 4-2-3-1 possibly. in a 4-3-3 your front three all have to have goal threat and suarez aside we don't have that. gerrard shouldn't be used in midfield anymore imo. get him further up the pitch and closer to suarez. all in all i don't think the players are comfortable in the system they're playing and their roles in it.
stmichael » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:52 pm wrote:amazing coincidence that we look more potent with 3 strikers on the pitch and we increase the tempo and start to press. the lack of urgency and pressing in the first half was cowardly.
woof woof ! » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:59 pm wrote:stmichael » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:52 pm wrote:amazing coincidence that we look more potent with 3 strikers on the pitch and we increase the tempo and start to press. the lack of urgency and pressing in the first half was cowardly.
Yeah, it's Brendans plan B, unfortunately we have to be 2-0 down before it's implemented.
Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests