Signings since jan 2011 - Who will come good eventually?

Liverpool Football Club - General Discussion

Postby stmichael » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:19 pm

Kerry07 wrote:You left out a word in your sentence.. Newcastle are proof of what you get by sticking by good players.

Both Collocini and Guitierrez had pedigree before they came to England. Collocini was highly touted since he was a kid at Boca and went to AC Milan, then had a very succesful spell for Deportivo in la liga. Guitierrez has over 20 caps for Argentina (look at the quality they can choose from in midfield).

I think Lucas is a better example. Would you have said he was "good enough" two years ago?

This is a guy who was voted best young player in Brazil, was getting picked by for the senior aquad on a regular basis and yet was getting booed by some morons at home games.

Now look at him. He was always a good player. He just took a while to acclimatise like other South American players. He's now one of the first names on our team sheet and the best in his role/position in the League.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby Greavesie » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:23 pm

stmichael wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:You left out a word in your sentence.. Newcastle are proof of what you get by sticking by good players.

Both Collocini and Guitierrez had pedigree before they came to England. Collocini was highly touted since he was a kid at Boca and went to AC Milan, then had a very succesful spell for Deportivo in la liga. Guitierrez has over 20 caps for Argentina (look at the quality they can choose from in midfield).

I think Lucas is a better example. Would you have said he was "good enough" two years ago?

This is a guy who was voted best young player in Brazil, was getting picked by for the senior aquad on a regular basis and yet was getting booed by some morons at home games.

Now look at him. He was always a good player. He just took a while to acclimatise like other South American players. He's now one of the first names on our team sheet and the best in his role/position in the League.

If Newcastle fans had it their way Jonas and Collo would have been out the door years ago. The fans didn't think they had any ability at all. Collo was on par with Boumsong at one point, balls to pedigree, it proves nothing *points finger at Torres*
All round the fields of Anfield Road
Where once we watched the King Kenny play (and could he play!)
Stevie Heighway on the wing
We had dreams and songs to sing
'Bout the glory, round the Fields of Anfield Road

JFT 96 - Gone but never forgotten
YNWA 15/4/1989
God Bless You All
User avatar
Greavesie
 
Posts: 9100
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 2:29 am
Location: Newcastle

Postby Raoul » Mon Jan 16, 2012 2:56 pm

Johnny Boy wrote:
Raoul wrote:As far as Henderson goes, it is obvious to me that there is a very good player in there. My only concern about him is whether he has the passion to reach his undoubted potential. He plays without any real sense of urgency or fire. Without that, he'll never be worth the 20 mill we paid, he'll never reach his potential.

I think Henderson is a man management question. Kenny bought him, now it is up to him to help Henderson find the passion and fire he needs to become a very good, if not great, player.

But I'll admit to being very concerned. If Henderson had shown any of the drive of someone like Spearing, he'd already be one to get excited about...

I think he definitely has the passion, you can see the frustration and dissapointment on his face when he makes a mess of something.
If anything he is probably trying too hard to please.

I would like to see him get forward more.

I'm not convinced yet, but playing alongside Gerrard in the last couple of games, Henderson has started looking like a different player.
"Life is not just about money. There are other things, important things that have a different kind of value. Anyone from Liverpool could tell you that."

- Jamie Carragher
User avatar
Raoul
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 1609
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:29 am

Postby Kerry07 » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:14 pm

stmichael wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:You left out a word in your sentence.. Newcastle are proof of what you get by sticking by good players.

Both Collocini and Guitierrez had pedigree before they came to England. Collocini was highly touted since he was a kid at Boca and went to AC Milan, then had a very succesful spell for Deportivo in la liga. Guitierrez has over 20 caps for Argentina (look at the quality they can choose from in midfield).

I think Lucas is a better example. Would you have said he was "good enough" two years ago?

This is a guy who was voted best young player in Brazil, was getting picked by for the senior aquad on a regular basis and yet was getting booed by some morons at home games.

Now look at him. He was always a good player. He just took a while to acclimatise like other South American players. He's now one of the first names on our team sheet and the best in his role/position in the League.

Correct, Lucas had pedigree, hence we stuck by him as Newcastle did with Guiterriez and Collocini. The one difference is though Lucas was an attacking midfielder at Gremio, and is now being deployed in a position that isnt natural to him (holding mid). He wasnt cutting it in the Premiership going forward (shooting is weak) so he was moulded into a more defensive player. Hes no Mascherano, and he is slow on the turn, but his game intelligence means he can often make up for this.

Good players/managers with pedigree that are not performing, must be given time.. though there are times when even they are given time and fail to deliver (Shevchenko, Veron).
"Its not just any other club" C.Tyldsley
"Liverpool are a special institution" X.Alonso
"Anfield es un templo de fútbol" AS
"The English club prove miracles do exist" D.Maradona
"Theres not one club in the world so united with its fans. Liverpool fans sent shivers down my spine" J.Cruyff
Kerry07
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 am
Location: London

Postby Kerry07 » Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:16 pm

Greavesie wrote:
stmichael wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:You left out a word in your sentence.. Newcastle are proof of what you get by sticking by good players.

Both Collocini and Guitierrez had pedigree before they came to England. Collocini was highly touted since he was a kid at Boca and went to AC Milan, then had a very succesful spell for Deportivo in la liga. Guitierrez has over 20 caps for Argentina (look at the quality they can choose from in midfield).

I think Lucas is a better example. Would you have said he was "good enough" two years ago?

This is a guy who was voted best young player in Brazil, was getting picked by for the senior aquad on a regular basis and yet was getting booed by some morons at home games.

Now look at him. He was always a good player. He just took a while to acclimatise like other South American players. He's now one of the first names on our team sheet and the best in his role/position in the League.

If Newcastle fans had it their way Jonas and Collo would have been out the door years ago. The fans didn't think they had any ability at all. Collo was on par with Boumsong at one point, balls to pedigree, it proves nothing *points finger at Torres*

Their fans are ignorant then (geordies tend to be more so).

Both players had pedigree before they arrived on Tyneside, and to be honest im surprised they are at Newcastle as they could do much better.
"Its not just any other club" C.Tyldsley
"Liverpool are a special institution" X.Alonso
"Anfield es un templo de fútbol" AS
"The English club prove miracles do exist" D.Maradona
"Theres not one club in the world so united with its fans. Liverpool fans sent shivers down my spine" J.Cruyff
Kerry07
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 am
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:23 pm

Kerry07 wrote:Correct, Lucas had pedigree, hence we stuck by him as Newcastle did with Guiterriez and Collocini. The one difference is though Lucas was an attacking midfielder at Gremio, and is now being deployed in a position that isnt natural to him (holding mid). He wasnt cutting it in the Premiership going forward (shooting is weak) so he was moulded into a more defensive player. Hes no Mascherano, and he is slow on the turn, but his game intelligence means he can often make up for this.

Good players/managers with pedigree that are not performing, must be given time.. though there are times when even they are given time and fail to deliver (Shevchenko, Veron).

Why does Lucas's time at Gremio count as 'pedigree' in your view, but Carroll's time at Newcastle, I presume, doesn't?

This is an interesting point for comparison since you were one of Lucas's biggest critics (admittedly I was too, for a while) and argued that he was the epitome of mediocrity who would never improve to the level of being good enough for a club of our stature and ambition. It seems odd to me that coming from this position you could be quite so absolutist in your stance toward other players who've yet to prove themselves.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Kerry07 » Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:37 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:Correct, Lucas had pedigree, hence we stuck by him as Newcastle did with Guiterriez and Collocini. The one difference is though Lucas was an attacking midfielder at Gremio, and is now being deployed in a position that isnt natural to him (holding mid). He wasnt cutting it in the Premiership going forward (shooting is weak) so he was moulded into a more defensive player. Hes no Mascherano, and he is slow on the turn, but his game intelligence means he can often make up for this.

Good players/managers with pedigree that are not performing, must be given time.. though there are times when even they are given time and fail to deliver (Shevchenko, Veron).

Why does Lucas's time at Gremio count as 'pedigree' in your view, but Carroll's time at Newcastle, I presume, doesn't?

This is an interesting point for comparison since you were one of Lucas's biggest critics (admittedly I was too, for a while) and argued that he was the epitome of mediocrity who would never improve to the level of being good enough for a club of our stature and ambition. It seems odd to me that coming from this position you could be quite so absolutist in your stance toward other players who've yet to prove themselves.

I was a massive critic of Lucas because he was shocking (the Reading Cup loss at Anfield when their midfield ran rings around us was embarrassing). Lucas has been decent (having been moulded into a defensive player) and as hes got used to the role he has improved, but hes nowhere near the class of Hamann/Mascherano. We miss him because we dont have another holding player at the club.

We bought him as, quote, "an attacking midfielder"...but it became apparent early on he couldnt cut in that role in the Premiership. Série A in Brazil is much much slower, less running required so the demands are much lower. Because he couldn't do the same role here, he was then moulded into something else (a holding midfielder) and hes been decent (gets exposed against pace). He did have pedigree yes, but in a different role. We did similar with Kuyt. After banging in the goals for Feyenoord, he wasn't able to cut it upfront in the Premiership, so we pushed him out to right midfield due to his workrate and solidity in providing cover for the right back.
"Its not just any other club" C.Tyldsley
"Liverpool are a special institution" X.Alonso
"Anfield es un templo de fútbol" AS
"The English club prove miracles do exist" D.Maradona
"Theres not one club in the world so united with its fans. Liverpool fans sent shivers down my spine" J.Cruyff
Kerry07
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 am
Location: London

Postby LFC2007 » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:20 pm

Kerry07 wrote:I was a massive critic of Lucas because he was shocking (the Reading Cup loss at Anfield when their midfield ran rings around us was embarrassing). Lucas has been decent (having been moulded into a defensive player) and as hes got used to the role he has improved, but hes nowhere near the class of Hamann/Mascherano. We miss him because we dont have another holding player at the club.

We bought him as, quote, "an attacking midfielder"...but it became apparent early on he couldnt cut in that role in the Premiership. Série A in Brazil is much much slower, less running required so the demands are much lower. Because he couldn't do the same role here, he was then moulded into something else (a holding midfielder) and hes been decent (gets exposed against pace). He did have pedigree yes, but in a different role. We did similar with Kuyt. After banging in the goals for Feyenoord, he wasn't able to cut it upfront in the Premiership, so we pushed him out to right midfield due to his workrate and solidity in providing cover for the right back.

I think you're being somewhat begrudging in your praise for Lucas (and if I was to play Amateur-Freud, I'd suggest this might be because you were so adamant that he would never cut it). For as much as he may lack the extra gears that distinguished top class players like Mascherano, Lucas became, after much hard work and endless opportunities, a reliable holding player and was crucial to the improvements in the team over the past 6-12 months. He was not merely "decent" in that time but a rock at the heart of midfield and one of those important possession players that you like to refer to, without mentioning him directly (see the team that thrashed Fulham last season? :D ). Point is, we persisted with him and although it cost the team in the short-term, we eventually reaped the benefits.

Now, I'm not saying that we can afford to persist for so long and afford to bear this cost each time a new signing fails to make timely progress. Big clubs have less margin for error if they want to remain competitive so it's important that signings settle more quickly than at other clubs, especially where the club's squad is already relatively weak and where those new signings have a key role to play. The performances of Carroll, Downing and Henderson since they signed can attest to this. But though a lost opportunity, it's not out of the question that one or all of them could eventually perform a Lucas-like turnaround. Provided we can strengthen the squad in the attacking department to such an extent that we are capable of making the top four, then I don't see why it should be absolutely necessary to sell these players at the earliest available opportunity. This is ultimately about balancing our short-term need to make the top four with the prospect of these players turning it around. We may very be able to 'carry' one or two of these players for a time to come, improve the squad further and make the top four.
User avatar
LFC2007
 
Posts: 7706
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: London

Postby Benny The Noon » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:43 pm

LFC2007 wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:I was a massive critic of Lucas because he was shocking (the Reading Cup loss at Anfield when their midfield ran rings around us was embarrassing). Lucas has been decent (having been moulded into a defensive player) and as hes got used to the role he has improved, but hes nowhere near the class of Hamann/Mascherano. We miss him because we dont have another holding player at the club.

We bought him as, quote, "an attacking midfielder"...but it became apparent early on he couldnt cut in that role in the Premiership. Série A in Brazil is much much slower, less running required so the demands are much lower. Because he couldn't do the same role here, he was then moulded into something else (a holding midfielder) and hes been decent (gets exposed against pace). He did have pedigree yes, but in a different role. We did similar with Kuyt. After banging in the goals for Feyenoord, he wasn't able to cut it upfront in the Premiership, so we pushed him out to right midfield due to his workrate and solidity in providing cover for the right back.

I think you're being somewhat begrudging in your praise for Lucas (and if I was to play Amateur-Freud, I'd suggest this might be because you were so adamant that he would never cut it). For as much as he may lack the extra gears that distinguished top class players like Mascherano, Lucas became, after much hard work and endless opportunities, a reliable holding player and was crucial to the improvements in the team over the past 6-12 months. He was not merely "decent" in that time but a rock at the heart of midfield and one of those important possession players that you like to refer to, without mentioning him directly (see the team that thrashed Fulham last season? :D ). Point is, we persisted with him and although it cost the team in the short-term, we eventually reaped the benefits.

Now, I'm not saying that we can afford to persist for so long and afford to bear this cost each time a new signing fails to make timely progress. Big clubs have less margin for error if they want to remain competitive so it's important that signings settle more quickly than at other clubs, especially where the club's squad is already relatively weak and where those new signings have a key role to play. The performances of Carroll, Downing and Henderson since they signed can attest to this. But though a lost opportunity, it's not out of the question that one or all of them could eventually perform a Lucas-like turnaround. Provided we can strengthen the squad in the attacking department to such an extent that we are capable of making the top four, then I don't see why it should be absolutely necessary to sell these players at the earliest opportunity. This is ultimately about balancing our short-term need to make the top four with the prospect of these players turning it around. We may very be able to 'carry' one or two of these players for a time to come, improve the squad further and make the top four.

Well said

Im going to go one step further and say that Lucas is one of the best holding midfielders in the prem and his form before he got injured would of had him in the top guys in Europe.

Remember clearly the game against Man City as Toure came strolling forward bouncing off players until he hit Lucas - bam , Toure is on the floor and Lucas is strolling away with the ball at his first , it timing any DM in the world would of been proud off and it wasnt the first time he had done it over the last 12 months.
Benny The Noon
 

Postby Reg » Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:18 am

devaney wrote:
Reg wrote:
stmichael wrote:just watching newcastle and they're proof of what you get for sticking by players, irrespective of price tags. i'm talking about guitierrez and collocini, who both would have been tarred with the "not good enough" brush 12-18 months ago and yet have come on leaps and bounds.

Lads,

The fans are always the last to see this happening.

We've become Chelsea. Players don't come here for teh football, they come for the money and once here, they don't feel they have to perform.

Newcastle, Swansea, Spurs players, they're hungry. Our lads aren't.

Couldn't disagree more. I would not tar every player with the same brush.Many of them are incredibly hard working professionals.Yes our expectations under Kenny have been very high especially after the second half of last season. With a little bit more luck and tactical awareness we could have quite easily have won at least 4 of the 7 drawn games at Anfield.That would actually put us 5 pints off the top.Ok I know that City have a game in hand but just look how rocky they have been recently and they have spent a net £500m over the last 5/6 years! Things are just not as bad as a lot of people are making out.As supporters we need to keep the faith.It was the supporters that demanded that Kenny was given the job.He was out of management for over 10 years and needs to be given a serious chance of improving our fortunes.The only real major concerns I have are Downing and Carroll.Henderson and Adam will improve.

Carroll and Downing don't put the commitment in. Johnson has games when he's simply not there. There are otherss but I have to go to work!
User avatar
Reg
>> LFC Elite Member <<
 
Posts: 13709
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:24 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Kerry07 » Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:11 am

LFC2007 wrote:
Kerry07 wrote:I was a massive critic of Lucas because he was shocking (the Reading Cup loss at Anfield when their midfield ran rings around us was embarrassing). Lucas has been decent (having been moulded into a defensive player) and as hes got used to the role he has improved, but hes nowhere near the class of Hamann/Mascherano. We miss him because we dont have another holding player at the club.

We bought him as, quote, "an attacking midfielder"...but it became apparent early on he couldnt cut in that role in the Premiership. Série A in Brazil is much much slower, less running required so the demands are much lower. Because he couldn't do the same role here, he was then moulded into something else (a holding midfielder) and hes been decent (gets exposed against pace). He did have pedigree yes, but in a different role. We did similar with Kuyt. After banging in the goals for Feyenoord, he wasn't able to cut it upfront in the Premiership, so we pushed him out to right midfield due to his workrate and solidity in providing cover for the right back.

I think you're being somewhat begrudging in your praise for Lucas (and if I was to play Amateur-Freud, I'd suggest this might be because you were so adamant that he would never cut it). For as much as he may lack the extra gears that distinguished top class players like Mascherano, Lucas became, after much hard work and endless opportunities, a reliable holding player and was crucial to the improvements in the team over the past 6-12 months. He was not merely "decent" in that time but a rock at the heart of midfield and one of those important possession players that you like to refer to, without mentioning him directly (see the team that thrashed Fulham last season? :D ). Point is, we persisted with him and although it cost the team in the short-term, we eventually reaped the benefits.

Now, I'm not saying that we can afford to persist for so long and afford to bear this cost each time a new signing fails to make timely progress. Big clubs have less margin for error if they want to remain competitive so it's important that signings settle more quickly than at other clubs, especially where the club's squad is already relatively weak and where those new signings have a key role to play. The performances of Carroll, Downing and Henderson since they signed can attest to this. But though a lost opportunity, it's not out of the question that one or all of them could eventually perform a Lucas-like turnaround. Provided we can strengthen the squad in the attacking department to such an extent that we are capable of making the top four, then I don't see why it should be absolutely necessary to sell these players at the earliest available opportunity. This is ultimately about balancing our short-term need to make the top four with the prospect of these players turning it around. We may very be able to 'carry' one or two of these players for a time to come, improve the squad further and make the top four.

I'm in no way begrudging of Lucas, unquestionably he has improved (mainly because it took him time to learn a new position after he couldnt do the role he was bought for). The lack of pace is the one concern (the amount of times he gets left for dead by the attacking midfielder is startling.. remember Nasri this season at the Emirates turning him easily and then pulling away.. running at an unguarded back 4 before flashing a shot just wide). He doesnt possess the athleticism of Mascherano, he is however better on the ball.

We were spoiled with Alonso and Mascherano, so naturally thats an almost impossible act to follow. Having learned his new position, Lucas has massively improved and for that he deserves huge credit.
"Its not just any other club" C.Tyldsley
"Liverpool are a special institution" X.Alonso
"Anfield es un templo de fútbol" AS
"The English club prove miracles do exist" D.Maradona
"Theres not one club in the world so united with its fans. Liverpool fans sent shivers down my spine" J.Cruyff
Kerry07
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 am
Location: London

Postby Benny The Noon » Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:02 am

It was Dzeko who beat him for pace and he is a striker . Lucas covers the ground a lot quicker than you give him credit for and I can't remember many times over the last 12 months Lucas "being left for dead" by a CM
Benny The Noon
 

Postby red till i die!! » Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:51 pm

most should bear in mind that lucas is almost 5 years here so it is about time he stepped up.
he has improved in all that time but not as much as most on here seem to think.
compare him to two other brazillians in ramires and sandro who are similar in age,play the same role and came with less hype and have had a much better impact in the prem than lucas in less than half the time.
while lucas has improved he still is far short of being world class.

how many on here will afford the same time and patience to andy,stew,hendo and adam? or is it a case of if they hang around long enough they will become part of the furniture without improving the look of the room.
User avatar
red till i die!!
LFC Super Member
 
Posts: 8862
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:35 pm
Location: ireland

Postby stmichael » Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:22 pm

red till i die!! wrote:most should bear in mind that lucas is almost 5 years here so it is about time he stepped up.
he has improved in all that time but not as much as most on here seem to think.
compare him to two other brazillians in ramires and sandro who are similar in age,play the same role and came with less hype and have had a much better impact in the prem than lucas in less than half the time.
while lucas has improved he still is far short of being world class.

sandro has had a couple of decent games for spurs but isn't even a regular. he's nowhere near lucas' level. as for ramires, he doesn't play the same role at all. he's more box to box.
User avatar
stmichael
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22644
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby RedAnt » Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:41 pm

crazyhorse wrote:yawn...

Half a season these lads have had and already they are getting slaughtered.

All of the new signings have shown bits of really good stuff. I still feel we will get good value out of all of them. With Hendo it will take a few more seasons but that was made loud and clear when we bought him. Adam is no veteran either.

This is what you get with discussion forums. People post opinions that sometimes they don't even believe in. They post them simply because they can. In a sense the opinion's artificial. It's created merely for the purpose of posting and so opinions, judgments and everything, they all come so much faster!

Enriqué: Awsome. Slotted right in and obviously has secured LB as his own.

Hendo: Hard to say just yet. He has quality, no doubt about it. My main worry is that sometimes I forget he's even on the pitch. Playing a quality ball and getting an assist is awsome, but it dosen't take long to do. What of the other 89 minutes? He looks to have beefed up though. I guess the coaching staff are working on his physical side.

Downing: Mehhhhh....the trouble with Downing is he forgets to put in the effort. He thinks that swinging his leg is all he has to do and that the quality of the cross will come automatically. Sheesh, ask Carroll abou that one.

Carroll: Let's not kid outselves. Carroll is as Heskey and Crouch. We never signed him for pace or dribbling or super finishing. If he can get his head right, he can be a good player for us.

Adam: Hmm, Adam's good, but he's missing too much from his game. natural qualities that can't be taught. A CM needs he most qualities of any player on the pitch. They need to defend and attack of course. Personally I believe that Adam has been one of our problems this season. He plays a great ball and we all go Ooooooooh! No question marks over his passing. His shooting though, tackling, positioning, pace, anticpiation and the list goes on. Too much missing.

They're all new players for us though and i'll support ANYONE who wears the Liverbird, and I will never ever spout hatred at them. You'll Never Walk Alone :)
"The S*n: The paper you wipe your ars.e on and more sh*t comes off the paper"
User avatar
RedAnt
 
Posts: 2345
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Durham

PreviousNext

Return to Liverpool FC - General Discussion

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 88 guests

  • Advertisement
ShopTill-e