
dawson99 wrote:It is a massive north south thing. There are reasons she got 3 terms, personally i couldnt stand the labour/socialist ideals, the IRA at it's height trying to bomb her, the strikes and all that.
supersub wrote:A good start would be to read up on her attitudes and treatment of the football fan....the un-educated,unemployed heathens that gather at football grounds.
Igor Zidane wrote:Not even gonna bite in this thread . Suffice to say i will be dancing on the slags grave because it is personal you see it's very personal . I could give two fecks what anyone else thinks that's your prerogative. Greavsie lad you can watch whatever you are told to watch and you can form an opinion from there mate . My opinion is formed from personal experience , personal experience of what she did to me ,my family ,my city and many other working class communities up and down the land . I lived it mate so i think i'm pretty qualified to decide for myself what type of person she was and what type of government she led. All i'll ask is ,when your researching ,do it with an open mind and not with any agenda and i reckon you will come to only one conclusion .
This thread is going nowhere
dawson99 wrote:This thread is going nowhere. Basically Thatcher was like having a flu shot. You don;t like it, you're feeling the effects for a long time but in the long run you see how necessary it was in the first place.
Igor is more than allwoed to have his opinion, but London in the 80s was a completely different world to Liverpool, and we all have our life stories. Some are good under a tory government, some (more than some on a liverpool site) will be bad.
dawson99 wrote:This thread is going nowhere. Basically Thatcher was like having a flu shot. You don;t like it, you're feeling the effects for a long time but in the long run you see how necessary it was in the first place.
Igor is more than allwoed to have his opinion, but London in the 80s was a completely different world to Liverpool, and we all have our life stories. Some are good under a tory government, some (more than some on a liverpool site) will be bad.
Kenny Kan wrote:dawson99 wrote:This thread is going nowhere. Basically Thatcher was like having a flu shot. You don;t like it, you're feeling the effects for a long time but in the long run you see how necessary it was in the first place.
Igor is more than allwoed to have his opinion, but London in the 80s was a completely different world to Liverpool, and we all have our life stories. Some are good under a tory government, some (more than some on a liverpool site) will be bad.
The home counties weren't much better, feck knows what London was like but it wasn't all blitz and glitz under her regime.
Igor's well entitled to his opinion as far as I'm concerned I know she was loathed by many.
Igor Zidane wrote:dawson99 wrote:This thread is going nowhere. Basically Thatcher was like having a flu shot. You don;t like it, you're feeling the effects for a long time but in the long run you see how necessary it was in the first place.
Igor is more than allwoed to have his opinion, but London in the 80s was a completely different world to Liverpool, and we all have our life stories. Some are good under a tory government, some (more than some on a liverpool site) will be bad.
I had a lot of friends from darn sarf daws from when i worked on the ships and the ones from London in particular said . That although alot of London prospered under thatcher because of the banking industry and the finacial sector altogether . They reckoned that london lost alot of it's community spirit and became a very selfish and greedy city that was only interested in the me me me . It lost alot of it's friendliness according to them . Would you agree with that mate ?
Igor Zidane wrote:I wouldn't disagree that the unions had to much power in the 70's either , but imo under thatcher we went from one extreme to the other . Union became a dirty word and everyone in work should be entitled to representation .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests